Preview

Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the Mischief Rule

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
354 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the Mischief Rule
Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the mischief rule.
A strength of the mischief rule is that it helps to avoid absurd or harsh results. This is good because someone can be charged with something but if the literal rule was applied they could get away, but if the mischief rule is applied then the judge can change the meaning of the word and they wouldn’t get away with it. This happened in Smith v Hughes when prostitutes were soliciting men from a balcony but the act said they couldn’t do it from the street. The judge changed the law so they prosecute them. Another strength of the mischief rule is that it is flexible because judges can decide what Parliament intended. A case which uses the mischief rule and shows that it has flexibility is Royal College of Nursing V DHSS. The wording of the Abortion Act stated that pregnancies must be terminated by a medical professional, which didn’t include nurses, but nowadays with modern technology nurses can actually do one of the processes in an abortion. But the mischief rule does come with its disadvantages. A disadvantage of the mischief rule is that it gives too much power to judges because judges shouldn’t make law, it is up to Parliament. A case which uses the mischief rule and shows that judges have too much power because they are making law is Smith V Hughes. Under the street offences act it was an offence to solicit in the street or a public place. So prostitutes solicited men from their balconies. But they judge changed the act so that the prostitute could be prosecuted – This shows their power. The final disadvantage is that the mischief rule can be difficult to find in an case. How can judges decide what parliament intended when they weren’t present when the Act was made. This means that the judges won’t know what parliament intended when they interrupted the act so they have to take a guess and interpret the act themselves and so this could lead to them interpreting the act incorrectly.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter Four – The Exclusionary Rule Vicente Farias Jose Martinez The Exclusionary Rule  The Exclusionary Rule – Evidence obtained in violation of Fourth Amendment cannot be used at trial – The primary purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter police misconduct – What other purpose does the exclusionary rule have? The Exclusionary Rule …

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ty·rant (noun) a cruel and oppressive ruler.When the colonies broke free from Great Britain they had to make a new government and they didn’t want it to be exactly like Britain. They needed to guard from tyranny for the new country.The Constitution helped to guard from tyranny because everything has balanced power, clear structures, and a series of checks and balances on each branch in the National Government.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Causation refers to whether the defendant's conduct caused the harm or damage in a crime and it must be established in all result crimes. Causation in criminal liability is divided into factual causation and legal causation. Factual causation is the starting point and consists of applying the 'but for' test. In most cases, factual causation alone will be enough to establish causation. However, in some circumstances it will also be necessary to consider legal causation. Legal causation is when the result must be caused by a culpable act, the act of the defendant may not necessarily need to be the only cause, but must be more than minimal. Factual causation is established by applying the 'but for' test. This asks, 'but for the actions of the defendant, would the result have occurred?' If the answer is yes, the result would have occurred in any circumstance and the defendant is not liable. If no the defendant is liable as it can be said that their action was a factual cause of the result.…

    • 1719 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not one person can answer a question about the "exclusionary rule" until they know what is stated in the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment and the exclusionary rule go hand in hand. The Fourth Amendment was put into the constitution to limit on the actions of overzealous officers (Peak, 2006). Then, one must understand what is meant by "probable cause." Armed with this information, we can discuss the definition of the exclusionary rule and some of its history. Also, we will list some of the advantages and disadvantages of the exclusionary rule and ask the question should it be abandoned.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Discretion within the criminal trial process is a very important matter, as the judge or magistrate must exercise appropriate measures in order to reach a just verdict. For example the evidence presented in trial must be approved by the Judge or Magistrate in case the evidence used in court appears inadmissible or prejudicial. The Evidence Act 1995 applies court discretion within the trial process as it allows for the quality of fairness. Without the exercise of impartiality within the trial process the decision made by the jury may alter the final…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This exception allows the Government to offer illegally-seized evidence on cross-examination of the defendant to impeach the defendant after the defendant takes the stand and perjures himself. It should be noted that the exception applies only to the testimony of the defendant, and not to any other…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Law122 Final

    • 46388 Words
    • 186 Pages

    ethics is critical, structured examination of how individuals and institutions should behave when their actions affect others…

    • 46388 Words
    • 186 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    principles of safeguarding

    • 6763 Words
    • 28 Pages

    Summary of how exemplar evidence for HSC 024 meets the assessment requirements and assessment criteria…

    • 6763 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Principles of safeguarding

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages

    b. Sexual abuse: is the forcing of undesired sexual behaviour by one person upon another…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Principles of Safeguarding

    • 2832 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Sexual abuse – Loss of sleep, unexplained change in behaviour, soreness, tore stained or bloody underwear, sexual diseases or pregnancy.…

    • 2832 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Principles of Safeguarding

    • 5458 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Neglect by others – a person/people who are supposed to provide support for those who are unable to fully support or provide for themselves but that care and support is not given or is taken away. Neglect may include lack of food or drink, medical aids (like hearing aids/walking sticks) or medical support…

    • 5458 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Exclusionary Rule

    • 2371 Words
    • 10 Pages

    This paper will present the Exclusionary Rule and the original intentions for its enactment. It will discuss the importance of the rule and how it is a protection against an unlawful search and seizure and a violation of the rights provided by the Fourth Amendment. Also, this document will display the history of the Exclusionary Rule, with its first appearance in the case, Boyd v. United States in 1886. Weeks v. United States will show a better-established, stronger version of the exclusionary rule. Another expansion of the rule will be described by the Mapp v. Ohio case. In this paper, I will also state and describe the four primary exceptions to the exclusionary rule: Inevitable Discovery Doctrine, Valid Independent Source, Harmless Error, and the Good Faith Exception. I will subsequently describe the possible abuse of these exceptions and the complications with the exceptions. The document will examine statistical data regarding the exclusionary rule and conclude with my personal opinions regarding the exclusionary rule and its exceptions.…

    • 2371 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Exclusionary Rule

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page

    The exclusionary rule requires that evidence illegally seized must be excluded from criminal trials. Leon was the target of police surveillance based on an anonymous informant's tip. The police applied to a judge for a search warrant of Leon's home based on the evidence from their surveillance. A judge issued the warrant and the police recovered large quantities of illegal drugs. Leon was indicted for violating federal drug laws. A judge concluded that the affidavit for the search warrant was insufficient; it did not establish the probable cause necessary to issue the warrant. Thus, the evidence obtained under the warrant could not be introduced at Leon's trial.…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Exclusionary Rule

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1914, during the Supreme Court case Weeks versus the United States, the exclusionary rule was established (Hendrie 1). The exclusionary rule was a part of the Fourth Amendment. It states that evidence found at a crime scene is not admissible if it was not found under the correct procedures. This means that the government cannot conduct illegal searches of a person or place and use evidence that is found at that time. The government must go through the procedures of obtaining warrants or have probable cause to search an individual or place. The exclusionary rule is used to provide civil rights for individuals and restricts powers of the local and federal government (Lynch 1).…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tyranny is exhibited in many ways. In 1787 our founding fathers met in Philadelphia to discuss a problem, The Articles of Confederation were not working. So after a long debate, they made a decision, to throw out the old and in with the new. Meaning, to dump the Articles of Confederation and make the Constitution. How will another piece of paper guard against tyranny? Well, the Constitution will start a new era of government. Consisting of; Federalism, Separation of Powers, Checks and Balances, and Balancing Power between the Large and Small States.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays