Preview

Discuss Theories of Crime

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
308 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Discuss Theories of Crime
Discuss the theories of crime:
When convicted murderers were asked why they committed their crimes, Norman Smith said he acted out of boredom when he shot his victim. Other murderers have said they murdered for a challenge. There are three theories of crime which are biological, psychodynamic and behaviourist.
During the Victorian time, they believed that it was possible to spot a criminal by their features. Lombroso suggested that criminals form a separate species which is more primitive to humans; this was displayed through certain characteristics. For example; a narrow sloping brow, high cheekbones, large ears and a crooked or flat nose. Lombroso sampled the proportions of 383 skulls of dead criminals and 3,839 heads of living ones. He didn’t suggest that all criminal acts were perpetrated by people by their facial features but concluded that approximately 40% could be accounted for in this way. He later went further, attributing criminality to mental illnesses. For example: stating that most born criminals suffer from epilepsy to some degree. This theory caused great controversy in the 19th century and although Lombroso’s conclusions are not really supported by his own data, it was highly influential in promoting views about biological determinism. There is thought to be no scientific foundation for Lombroso’s theory. Goring compared the physical features of 3,000 convicts and a control group. He found little support for Lombroso’s theory of distinctive facial and cranial characteristics. Criminality and certain facial characteristics may both be affected by confounding factors such as poverty and poor nutrition. In addition, even if certain facial features occur more often in criminals, it does not mean that there is a casual relationship. They may be other explanations like people with certain facial features may be stereotyped as ʻhardʼ and picked on more often, leading to a self-fulfilling

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    His theory came from his study of prosecuted criminals both deceased and live. Lombroso differentiated the criminal bodily fitness to those of non-criminals, as well as people who were identified psychotic. In his study he found, to some degree those offenders he made research on were prone to have unusual bodily features, i.e. large jaws or unusual teeth. In his opinion these characteristics caused offenders to engage in criminal activities. This…

    • 2412 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    LESMA204

    • 2205 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Positivist criminology was founded in the late 19th century by Italian academic who called Cesare Lombroso. He believes that the positivist scientific method could be applied to the study of crime so as to find out its causes and prevent it. His particular approach was described as criminal anthropology. He compared the known offenders and a control group of soldiers by the post-mortem measurement and examination. After studying the resulting, Lombroso think that there a correlation between certain physical features, such as an asymmetrical face, large jaws and long arms, and criminality. In his opinion, these physical traits were characteristic of an earlier period of human evolution. It calls the born criminal. That means it was a throwback or atavistic. Lombroso concluded that behavioural traits such as criminality may link to the shape of the skull and the physiognomy may links behavioural characteristics to physical features, particularly of the face. He thinks that the pre-given dispositions of crime can be determine by observational physical features differences. And he assumed that known criminals were representative of all criminals.…

    • 2205 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What are the central assumptions of biological theories of crime? How do such theories differ from other perspectives that attempt to explain the same phenomena?…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marxist and neo-Marxist approaches and explanations of crime are arguably some of the most controversial, for the reason that they state that it is the ruling class that is responsible for criminalising the working classes, which goes directly against what official statistics and Functionalists believe. However, Marxism and Functionalism do share a similarity in that both believe structures and institutions of society play a very important role in determining how people behave, criminally or otherwise.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In looking at the Marxist explanation of crime and deviance one must also look to the non-sociologist explanations and those of other different groups in order to come to an informed view of the subject.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Left Realists provides a casual explanation for crime. Left Realists look at the individual and the causes which could have led them to commit crime. Right Realism comes from a New Right perspective which looks at the causes of crime and what can be put in place to deter criminals. The term ‘crime’ means behaviour that breaks the law. For example, someone who commits a crime such as murder or rape is considered a criminal. And the term ‘deviance’ refers to behaviour that the majority see as different from the accepted norms of society. For example, wearing a bikini is suitable at the beach but, it would not be appropriate to wear it at work. Left Realists such as Jock Young direct their aims on street crime that is committed by young people in urban areas. Young uses his victim survey to suggest that working class and black people, especially elderly women, have a realistic fear of street crime as they report that they are the victims of these crimes. Left Realist theory identifies three causes of crime.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of Crime

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Crime theories can vary greatly. A lot of people think that poverty or social status is a major factor on criminal behavior. Others believe that is embedded in human beings to be born with evil therefore we are attracted to crime. Bottom line is deterrence cannot be achieved unless the underlining cause for criminal behavior is found.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The aim of this essay is to compare, contrast and evaluate two sociological theories of crime causation and two psychological theories of crime causation.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminal Theories

    • 2780 Words
    • 10 Pages

    P3 – Describe two theories of criminal behaviour and the factors that contribute to them…

    • 2780 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Explaining Crime

    • 3366 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Agnew, R., (2006b), “Storylines As A Neglected Cause Of Crime”, Journal of Research in Crme and Delinquency, Vol.43, p.119-147.…

    • 3366 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories Of Criminology

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The debate regarding criminality being a result of nature or nurture has been a topic of discussion both within criminology and outside of it for decades. Criminologists brought forward theories attempting to address and explain this paradox, and explanations for crime included psychological, sociological, economical, biological reasons, amongst…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crime is defined as a breach of rules or laws that have been set by the government. Society has been given a set of rules that everyone who believes in good morals, follow. A crime would be anyone who has broken these set of laws for personal reasons such as greed. As of 2006, the crime rate of Toronto was 1,000 per 100,000. This has as shown a decrease since 2002. Crime has become an entity that is a part of society, without it, society would not function correctly. In the study of sociology, crime can be explained in four theoretical perspectives; Functionalism, conflict, interactionism, and feminism.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    reunited with his natural mother and sister after spending three years in the Army, but the union…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many theories to why crimes are committed, the classical approach has been around for centuries but it was not until the mid-1970s that it was renewed and formed was is now known as choice theory. That being said there are different types of choice theories and I will discuss one which is rational choice theory and this has different concepts that make it up.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The interaction view of crime is traced to the symbolic interactionist school of sociology pioneered by George Herbert Mead. As where the conflict and consensus perspective attempt to explain society as a whole ( sociology 9 ), interactionists focus on the every day to day interaction of individuals; furthermore it is the communication of two people. In a rough neighborhood boys engage in activities that are deviant such as skipping school or fighting. In their environment this may be okay but to authorities this is criminal and must be punished. In this theory punishment is likely to make matters worse. For this young boys are treated as delinquent and place into programs with older criminals, they identify as delinquents; increased…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays