Preview

Discussion Board Forum 1

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
837 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Discussion Board Forum 1
Discussion Board Forum 3
Harriet Sanders
Liberty University

Barney is dealing with several legal issues involving his property in this case. As a spiritual friend and attorney of Barney, I will advise him of his legal rights and obligations regarding his property. Then, I will remind Barney not to make any sudden decisions before asking God for assistance. James 5:11 (English Standard Version) states, “Behold, we consider those blessed who remained steadfast. You have heard of the steadfastness of Job, and you have seen the purpose of the Lord, how the Lord is compassionate and merciful”. The lord wants us to search for his kingdom first, and then all things will be added according to his riches and glory.
Looking at the first issue from a legal perspective, the problem involves a joint tenancy with right of survivorship. According to Segal (1998), “Pursuant to this right, upon death of one of the joint tenants, the interest held by the tenant passes to the remaining joint tenants without having to undergo probate”. However; there is another underlining issue with this property. Opie, Andy son, apparently took a loan out against the interest of his share of the property and defaulted. The bank is trying to foreclose on the property.

Before this can take place I will advise Barney that he abandoned the property for at least 20 years and other legal action may occur. However; according to Klien (1986), “In joint tenancy, property goes to the other owners automatically, regardless of what is stated in a will”. Creditors can only require repayment from the tenant share that is borrowing against the property. Barney property will be protected regardless of Opie’s past actions. The second issue with this property is complicated due to Barney’s absence at the property.

The adverse possession of real property law may not be in Barney’s favor because he left it unattended for over 20 years. According to Drayton (2006), “ Under the North Carolina law, an

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Janet (taxpayer) residing in Australia is named as the sole beneficiary of a property (1.85 hectares) with a large homestead as a result of the death of a relative on 7/10/2010. The property is not used for commercial purposes and at the date of death, the property was valued at $1.45million. Settlement took place on 21/12/2010. After moving into the homestead shortly after taking ownership, she planned to take a one-year trip which she had been planning for some time in late 2011. The taxpayer felt that the homestead was far too large for her (she is single),…

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gagnon V Coombs Summary

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To recap this matter: Francis Gagnon and his wife executed powers of attorney (POA) appointing their daughter, Joan Coombs, as their agent. Later on, the document was revoked per their son’s request but Joan was not advised of this fact. In two months, after Mrs. Gagnon’s death, Mr. Gagnon signed an agreement selling the farm he owned in Shelburne, MS and informed Joan of the sale and his intentions to live with Frank, his son, in Hillsborough, N.H, another property owned by Gagnon’s and given to Frank by Mr. Gagnon.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mr. Smith advised on or about 12/18/2015, he loaned his 2004 Bray landscape trailer to David Vanbrummelen to use at 9610 Fort King Road in Dade City, which is approximately 300 acres of land. On 04/16/2016, Mr. Smith made contact with Mr. Vanbrummelen to arrange for the return of his trailer. Mr. Vanbrummelen advised he did not have it and had not seen it since approximately 01/15/2016. Mr. Smith sent Mr. Vanbrummelen a five day demand for return of his trailer, that met with negative results. Mr. Smith said since he does not know where his trailer is or who is…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Cheeseman2013) In the case of Cunningham v. Hastings, Mr. Hastings and Mrs. Cunningham, was an unmarried couple, purchased a home together. Mr. Hastings put $45,000 down payment toward the home out of his pocket. When it came to how the deed established the deed stated Hastings Cunningham as joint tenants with the right of survivorship. The couple occupied the property jointly. When the relationship between the two ended, Mr. Hastings seized sole possession of the property. Mrs. Cunningham filed a complaint seeking partition of the real estate. Based on its determination that the property could not be split, the trial court ordered it to be sold. The trial court further ordered that $45,000 of the sale proceeds be paid to Mr. Hastings to reimburse…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lloyd S W12

    • 368 Words
    • 1 Page

    When a person enters into a lease he or she are entering into a property interest with the landlord where the lessee and his or her heirs have an interest in the lease term, and landlord has an interest in enforcing the lease to Ann or her heirs. This is would be if the there was a right of survival and that the lease was not supposed to end automatically if the tenant passes away or has something happen to where they are not able to keep the agreement with the owner. During the time in which the lease is in place, and the heirs default on the property, the landlord must make reasonable efforts to release the lease. However, if the property remains vacant; the estate of Ann is responsible for the contract terms. In reality, what happens is that the lease, along with all other assets and liabilities of Ann goes into probate for court administration. In any event at the expiration of the lease, the leased property automatically returns to the landlord.…

    • 368 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Nolans requested that the Naabs remove the garage from their property. When the Naabs refused, a lawsuit ensued. Who Wins?? (Adverse Possession)…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mr. Barney Case Study

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the three legal issues Mr. Barney is facing includes the investment of mountain home that he owns with three of his friends as joint tenants with right of survivorship. A law states that “The interests of the grantees holding property in joint tenancy with right of survivorship shall be deemed to be equal unless otherwise specified in the conveyance” (North Carolina g.s. § 41-2). This explains that when someone is under a joint tenancy with the right of survivorship and during that period if one of the owner dies, the other joint tenants get that owner’s portion in the property regardless of the deceased owner’s will or the rule of interstate succession (Lewis, 2011). In Mr. Barney’s case, one of his friends, Andy dies and his will showed interest of the property which is owned with three friends to his son, Opie. According to the law explained above, Opie is not entitled to become an owner or the partner of this property and therefore, Mr. Barney is not legally liable for the defaulted loan nor can the bank foreclose the property. As…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    State Intestacy Case Study

    • 3050 Words
    • 13 Pages

    receive the assets by state contract law. A joint tenant of properry hdd ]TWROS will also receive the decedent…

    • 3050 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bus 499 Bsba

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    An automobile stereo isn’t essential for the vehicle to operate and be used for transportation to and from work or any other errands. Barney has a lot of power in my opinion; it all depends on his will power. Although he wants the newer vehicle, he doesn’t need it. His current automobile is sufficient. He must decide if he cant get the price from Billie he wants, is he willing to sacrifice the purchase of the newer vehicle. I think Billie, is also in a very good position.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Appendix C Hca 210

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    | |ensure that they get all of their belongings back upon | |probably at the time property |…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    and a recreation hall with 76 acres of land for $38,000. The property was between the Redlands,…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since Barry doesn’t want the property in his name due to his financial situation, following the Doctrine of Worthier Title idea of keeping the reversion for himself is not a sensible option. The Rule in Shelly’s Case has been abolished in most states. This being the case, we will proceed in this manner as the state of New Tutor does not acknowledge this rule.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Law Firm

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In order to be liable under the attractive nuisance doctrine, the defendant must be the possessor of the land. Since George has been living on the land for his entire life, and he is 76 years old, it is reasonable to assume that he owns the land. But even if he didn’t own the land, and instead was renting, it is still clear that he farms the land. So he is still clearly in possession of it.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    himself to George and lennie and purchase a house with them as a result of the…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eleven months after moving into the home, Pat received the half-million dollar installment check. Pat immediately went to Dan with a check for $275,000 and asked Dan to convey the property to her according to their agreement. Dan refused to accept the check and ordered Pat to move out.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays