Preview

Discussion - Companies Act - Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
841 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Discussion - Companies Act - Law
Companies Act Chapter 81:01:- "No association, society, body or other group consisting of more than ten persons may be formed for the purpose of carrying on any trade or business for gain unless it is—
(a) incorporated under this Act;
(b) Formed under some other written law; or
(c) A partnership"
According to the Companies Act Chapter 81:01, a “shareholder”, in relation to a company, means a person described in section 107(1); which states that a shareholder is:
(a) a person who is a member of the company under section 349(3);
(b) The personal representative of a deceased shareholder and the trustee in bankruptcy of a bankrupt shareholder;
(c) a person in whose favour a transfer of shares has been executed and delivered but whose name has not been entered in the register of members of the company or, if two or more such transfers have been executed and delivered, the person in whose favour the most recent transfer has been made, provided that in the case of a company other than a public company in respect of the persons mentioned in paragraphs (b) and (c).
“The majority usually dictates the action of a company and the minority is usually bound by the decisions of the majority (Foss v Harbottle (1843)). Problems may arise where those in effective control of a company use their power in such a way as either to benefit themselves or to cause a detriment to the minority shareholders. In the light of such a possibility, the law has intervened to offer protection to minority shareholders. The source of the protection may be considered in three areas: * Fraud on the minority: it has long established at common law that those controlling the majority of the shares are not to be allowed to use their position of control to perpetuate what is known as a fraud on the minority. In such circumstances, the individual shareholder will be able to take legal action in order to remedy their situation (Cook v Deeks (1916)); * Just and equitable winding up; *



References: 1. Laws of Trinidad and Tobago. Ministry of Legal Affairs https://www.ttbizlink.gov.tt/trade/tnt/cmn/pdf/Companies%20Act-81.01.pdf 2. Routledge Cavendish. “Company Law” Lawcard Series, Business Law Pg 89-90. 3. Ashfords Solicitors , “Guide to Unfair Prejudice Against Shareholders” Last Modified Monday 8th February, 2010. Darte accessed:20th June, 2012 http://www.ashfords.co.uk/news/shareholders_disputes_guide

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Answear

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A) A shareholder could commence an action on behalf of the corporation against the director if he gets the court's permission to do so.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case App1

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages

    _Company members which does not offer or trade its company stock (shares) to the general public on the stock market exchanges, but rather the company's stock is offered, owned and traded or exchanged privately.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Business Law Case Summary

    • 2465 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Corporation Act 2001 (Cth) as well as the Turquand rule of internal management in common…

    • 2465 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    8. May a director of a proprietary company that has a material personal interest in a matter that relates to the affairs of a company be present at the meeting of the vote on matters that relate to the interest?…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The House of Lords in Salomon v Salomon1 affirmed the legal principle that, upon incorporation, a company is generally considered to be a new legal entity separate from its shareholders. The court did this in relation to what was essentially a one person company. Windeyer J, in the High Court in Peate v Federal Commissioner of Taxation,2 stated that a company represents:…

    • 15226 Words
    • 61 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    company law

    • 1675 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to section 140, a company’s constitution is only an internal governance rule, it cannot be enforced by outsider and also cannot be used and act between a company member and an outsider (Corporation Act, 2001).…

    • 1675 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Tony, C. & Christopher, S. 2009, Corporations Law in Principle, 8th edn, Thompson Reuters, Australia…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “In spite of the obvious economic connection between companies within the same group, English company law has steadfastly maintained its policy of treating such companies as distinct legal entities.”…

    • 4700 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many companies are controlled by single or a group of shareholders. This is particularly common in proprietary companies. In a majority-controlled company, minority shareholders face significant problem If the controllers run the company in their own interest or act unfairly discriminatory, unfairly prejudicial or oppressively. The Corporation Act provides effective procedures to enable members to obtain remedies in circumstances where the controllers of a company act oppressively or unfairly towards them.…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stakeholders of Tesco

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A shareholder is Any person, company or other institution that owns at least one share of a company’s stock. Shareholders are a company's owners.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Useless

    • 256 Words
    • 1 Page

    Shareholder Definition - An individual, group, or organization that owns one or more shares in a company, and in whose name the share certificate is issued.…

    • 256 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corporations Law

    • 1502 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s124, also outlines the legal capacity and powers of a company. S 124(1) states, “ a company has the legal capacity and power of an individual both in and outside this jurisdiction”. A company can also be held primarily3 or secondarily4 accountable for torts and crimes. To think of a corporation as solely an instrument of business, fails to account for social changes, which has taken place over the past century. 5 It is therefore vital that…

    • 1502 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Minority shareholder is a shareholder who owns less than 50 percent of the total shares of a corporation’s stock. A minority shareholder does not have the voting control of the corporation; neither can s/he single-handedly elect the directors of the corporation. They even don’t have any real say in the running of the company or corporation…

    • 6165 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As important aim of companies act is to eliminate the evils caused by large number of partnerships trading In unincorporated form. A business association consisting of a large number of members, unless incorporated as a company, leads to inevitable confusion and uncertainty concerning the rights and liabilities of members inter se and their relations with others. Its therefore, necessary to provide that every business association having a certain number of members must be registered as a company failing which it shall be regarede as an u\illegal association.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are a few rights that can make the individual part bring an activity if there is any encroachment. The rights are to have the update and article see, to control ultra infection and unlawful acts, to have entry to the organization's record and have certain data to be given to them, to go to and vote at general meeting and the last one it to be dealt with decently. An illustration of a shareholder upholding his rights can be found in Wood v Odessa Waterworks Ltd, where a shareholder implemented a privilege in the articles to be paid a profit, instead of being issued a debenture, which was what the chiefs proposed. A cautious qualification must be drawn between situations where a shareholder has the privilege to implement the articles on the grounds that they give some individual right on him and situations where there is an encroachment of the articles which adds up to close to an inside inconsistency, which can be cured by a conventional…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays