Preview

Discussion Of Marx's 'False Consciousness'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1233 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Discussion Of Marx's 'False Consciousness'
Class consciousness, linked in with false consciousness, is a core concept of Marx’s thought about how society is run and capitalism upheld and his ideas have moulded the way other sociologists think and approach the central issues and concepts of society . This notion stems from Marx’s belief that Capitalism leads to divisions in society which come about when the “direct producers [are] separated from the means of production, [and] become the monopoly over the minority” . Marx was originally influenced by Hegel’s study of the French revolution forming the opinion that one system of society will be replaced by another, causing society to develop through the “ancient, feudal and industrial” societies. Marx, using Hegel’s philosophies, explains …show more content…
As Giddens states, Marx looks at how “class relationships directly link to the economic organisation of society” . From this, Marx shows that the way production is organised shapes the way society is organised and he used his idea of a base and superstructure to demonstrate this because, in order to understand society, one needs to be able to understand those who are in charge of it, as they define the dominant ideology and Marx saw false consciousness as the product of this unequal social order. Marx believed that having a False Consciousness allowed Capitalism to flourish because it prevented the Proletariat from seeing their own worth and value of labour and from realising the exploitation and inequality present in Capitalism. Consequently, through history it has been seen that “society gives off a social pressure” meaning that individuals act against their own beliefs because society dictates they do, echoing Marx’s theory on false consciousness where members of society are seen to be individualistic and disunited. Marx predicted that this inequality in society will undermine Capitalism and cause its downfall as the gain of a Class Consciousness, will remove this individualistic idea and allow for the creation of unified workers to overthrow the Bourgeoisie and the Capitalism underpinning …show more content…
However, it doesn’t necessarily fit as he had predicted it would “as the working class in the form which Marx conceived it, no longer exists” . This can be seen in modern society where there is a higher proportion of white-collar workers than blue-collar workers which goes against Marx’s theory that most are destined for blue-collar work resulting in a smaller class of capitalists . Instead, Marx’s theory of class consciousness and the succeeding revolution has been altered so that now the problem for the working class is not to rival the upper classes but reject the idea that their only role is that of a labourer . However, despite Marx’s predictions much of the world is still capitalist because the ruling class “provide the preconditions for [its] continuation” meaning the cycle of capitalism is unlikely to end because capitalism itself is constantly evolving and society adapts with it. Therefore, it could be said that the theory of class consciousness is still relevant today, but instead of two antagonistic divisions, “there is a large middle class” with a slowly closing class gap, making the inequalities that became the driving force of Marx’s theory on class consciousness and the subsequent revolutions, less apparent and therefore less of a point of conflict in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    2. Note the results from the 20th generation under global warming conditions. Before continuing with the 30th generation, predict the population composition of the 30th generation. One would accept a loss of lighter color and larger leafhopper leading to a population predominated by darker smaller leafhopper.…

    • 760 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 1 Sociology Notes

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Karl Marx’s class conflict theory states that the bourgeoisie (or the capitalists) are locked in conflict with the proletariat (the exploited workers). Marx believed that this conflict could only end when the working class united and violently broke free of the “bondage”. Once this happens, society will be classless and people will work according to their abilities, while receiving goods and services according to their needs. Although Marxism does propose revolution, it should not be confused with communism.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx then goes into the first part of the body of his manifesto entitled "Bourgeois and Proletarians." In this part, he goes into how society started communal but then became more unequal as time went on. Systems such as Feudalism, Mercantilism, and Capitalism benefited from the use of exploitation. He first introduces the idea that economic concerns of a nation drive history, and that the struggle between the rich bourgeoisie and the hard working proletariat would eventually lead to Communism. He goes on and on about how the bourgeois have always got what they wanted. Marx reflected more on the negatives committed by the bourgeois than the positives. He states the bourgeoisie "has agglomerated population, centralized means of production, and has concentrated property in a few hands." (Marx, p.8) He then describes the proletarians, or the labor class, and how they were formed, how they have suffered, and how they must overcome their struggles. Marx declares that this “dangerous class,” the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of old society, may, here and there, be swept into the movement by a proletarian revolution." (Marx, p.15) This began an inevitable revolution where the proletariats take over and dethrone the bourgeoisie.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alex De Tocqueville Analysis

    • 2702 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Karl Marx and Frederick Engels are well known for their contributions to socio-economics which was displayed in their writing of The Communist Manifesto. Marx and Engels wanted society to establish a classless system in which the proletariat would rise up over the bourgeoisie. The bourgeoisie represented the ruling class which had been established as a result of the failed system of feudalism in the 1800s. Marx believed that the bourgeoisie could rule only so long as it best represented the economically productive forces of society and that when it ceased to do so it would be destroyed and replaced and eventually this cycle would continue until there was a virtually classless society. In his writing Marx argues that the proletariat needs to overtake the bourgeoisie by means of a social revolution. He believes that due to Industrialism the proletariats have learned how to work together and will thus untie to overthrow the bourgeoisie. The proletariats had become the productive class, even though they…

    • 2702 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx believed class struggles had existed throughout history and concluded that because of industrialization, society had dwindled down to two classes: the proletariat (laborers) and the bourgeoisie (owners of the means of production). He viewed class struggles and industry as harmful to humanity because they allowed the bourgeoisie to exploit the proletariat.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl Marx and Adam Smith

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marx posited that the two classes in a society – the bourgeoisie and the proletariat – will remain stuck in their respective classes because of the very nature of capitalism. The wealthy capital-owning bourgeoisie not only owns the factories but dominate the media, universities, government, bureaucracy, and, therefore their grip on an elevated social status is unchangeable. In contrast, the poor, working class, or the…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marx believed that capitalism contained the seeds of its own destruction. He described how the wealth of the bourgeoisie depended on the work of the proletariat. Therefore, capitalism requires an underclass. But Marx predicted that the continued exploitation of this underclass would create great resentment. Eventually the proletariat would lead a revolution against the bourgeoisie.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx vs. Weber

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marx posited that there are two main classes in any capitalist society, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, and that the two classes are defined by their relationship to resources specifically the means of production. The bourgeoisie own and control the means of production. Therefore, they have a high, economically powerful position in society. The proletariat or workers class can only subsist by offering their labor to the upper class. This division between the classes is what drives class conflict.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Marxist theory of class shows that the class a person belongs to is a fundamental part of their identity. For Marx, society generated two main classes, a capital-owning class and a property less class. They called these the ruling class and the working class or the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Class is rooted in the economic organization of production i.e. those groups who own factories, farms, coal mines or raw materials. These groups look after their own interests, live in similar surroundings and send their children to similar schools. Marx believed that class consciousness is particularly important to our understanding of identity. This is an awareness of a shared class interest and the existence of classes with opposing interests. Class consciousness would emerge through solidarity and collective action. For Marx, the key factor is private ownership of economic resources.…

    • 801 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxism is a useful conflict theory in helping us to understand why there was obedience, particularly in the past in society. Marx saw negativity within the economy; he believed that the functioning and running of society was based upon the economy. Because of this, Marx states why there is a divide between the proletariat (working class who have only their skills to sell) and the bourgeoisie (the ruling class who own the means of production). The bourgeoisie cannot operate without the proletariat, as they cannot produce products, and similarly the proletariat cannot operate without the bourgeoisie, as they need them so they can be paid a wage and feed their families. On the other hand, this can be viewed from a different perspective. However it can be argued that these people may have not left their jobs is because they could have been in a state of false consciousness, whereby they were unaware of their exploitation by the bourgeoisie. This helps us to understand society as the Marxism theory provides reasoning on how the bourgeoisie were able to exploit the proletariat, which in turn powered capitalism and allowed the ruling elite to maintain their profits. It is also relevant to today’s society, as it helps to explain why many people who are in a low paid job (e.g. Factory workers) do not leave, despite hating their job, and this is because they need the money to survive. On the other hand radical social change would be inevitable according to Marx, society would enter a final period- communism. However this can be criticized as capitalism has only…

    • 881 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism is an ideology based on the economic and political theories of Karl Marx and Freidrich Engels. Karl Marx who was born in Germany in 1818 was a revolutionary whose ideas on society were the foundation of communism. Under modern capitalism the means of production, such as factories, land, and technology are controlled by a small minority who Marx called the bourgeoisie. Production is carried out by the working class, known as the proletarians who have to sell their labour or face poverty or starvation. Taken together these two classes form the economic base of society, what Marx called the substructure. Marx saw that there was conflict between these two divisions and that this could only be resolved by a revolution, which would lead to a classless society, where the means of production would be held collectively. All Marx’s theories use social class as a starting point for analysis. In this essay we will explore two areas where Marx’s theories have had influence, crime and deviance and education. Marx saw the bourgeoisie as controlling these institutions. Marxists believe that these institutions form part of the superstructure of society with the economy as its base.…

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Industrial Revolution around the 18th and early 19th centuries, Karl Marx (the founder of communism) analyzed the conflict which he strongly believed exists between the Bourgeoisie (Upper-Middle Class) and Proletariat (Lower Class). Marx was against capitalistic views because in his perspective, such a system of society only meant that the privileged groups would exploit the sub-ordinate groups and this would result in a massive class-inequality. Moreover, that the rich would keep getting richer and the poor would remain getting poorer. In society, mankind will have lost its appreciation for equality and human welfare. Taxation or any other methods will be of no use because it does not guarantee a Lower-Class citizen a better position in employment, education, or wealth. But, merely provides them enough wages so that they may hold themselves in place. Marx believed that in order to eliminate class-struggle and inequality would mean to eliminate capitalism as a whole and resort to the ways of socialism which would eventually, lead to…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A Day at Seagraves

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages

    We all know that management operates through various functions. Dr. Pope did a great job in staffing; he studied the pros and cons of the two applicants before picking one of them. He has also done a great job in organizing, because he told himself to tell the department heads that they did not need his concurrence on such little projects. “I probably should set some guidelines” he thought to himself. This is where creating involves because his creative idea that he should set some guidelines instead. He has also done a great job in leading because every problem he always has a answer and decision.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rural Marketing

    • 17441 Words
    • 70 Pages

    Submitted in the partial fulfillment of the award of PG Degree of Master of Business Administration Session 2008-09…

    • 17441 Words
    • 70 Pages
    Powerful Essays