The worm and worm wheel is a very important mechanism in the field of Mechanical engineering. It has the ability to lift heavy loads with very little effort and keep the load raised and locked in a desired vertical position without any effort. The main objective of this experiment was to investigate the behaviour of the worm and worm wheel gear set.
Unfortunately, all the objectives of this experiment weren’t fulfilled in this session due to the following factors:
The experiment was done only using a single starter worm
The experiment was done by using only one gear which had 40 teeth.
The apparatus was recently repaired and consequently, it affected the experiment results to a certain extent.
However, the experiment was fully conducted for a single started worm in mesh with a 40 teeth gear set.
To start the experiment, the effort pulley and the load drum were loaded with appropriate weights and wound. After the weights were loaded, a small downward pull was given to the effort hanger in order to overcome the static friction. It was advised that this manual downward pull should be given by the same person and the force should be the same throughout the whole experiment since it could affect the experiment results adversely if done otherwise. And it was also advised that when releasing the effort, the effort hanger should be released from the same vertical height. Although the reason for this is not fully explainable, it can be assumed that this was either because the surface nature of the effort cord was not uniform or due to the number of rotations of the effort cord on the effort pulley that caused a slight difference in the friction between the cord segments. After the experiment, readings for Applied load and Actual effort were obtained and tabulated. The tabulated data was then plotted to obtain a graph after further calculations. The graph was drawn for Actual effort (Ea) vs. Applied load (F) to find the Law of the machine.
During the experiment, there were few conflicts in opinions. Instances for such discrepancies were when at some attempts, the effort was able to lift the load with a mass very low than expected. The reason for this phenomenon is also not completely explainable since physical concepts such as static and dynamic friction are still not quite clearly understood. But it could be assumed that this was due to human error because the initial downward pull was applied manually and there was a chance that the pull was not uniform in all instances of the experiment.
In this worm and worm wheel gear set, the machine may not provide a continuous efficiency for all loads since there is a limit to its efficiency. The limiting efficiency for this apparatus can be termed as the reciprocal of the product of the velocity ratio and the slope of the graph drawn for the Law of the machine.
The limiting efficiency for the gear set is as follows:
<calculations>
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
This laboratory experiment was a combination of two separate experiments as stated in the above title. The introduction has been split into 2 separate components to briefly give some background on each procedure.…
- 1093 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The first part of this section discusses the observations and results of the lab as well as any mistakes that may have been made (or what measures were taken to try to avoid mistakes) and what improvements, if any, you can think of for the procedure for the next time the lab will be conducted.…
- 595 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Experimental Sources of Error: We could have produced better results if there was a hands-on instruction before. We had at least four times where the cartridge wasn’t held properly, the syringe was not properly cleaned and even some of the measurements weren’t 100% accurate.…
- 558 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
How does sodium chloride in measurements of 0.5%, 2%, 5%, 10% and 15% affect the shoot development, this will be measured from the base of the plant to the tip, of the Phaseolus Vulgaris (green beans)?…
- 2032 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays -
The first part of this section discusses the observations and results of the lab as well as any mistakes that may have been made (or what measures were taken to try to avoid mistakes) and what improvements, if any, you can think of for the procedure for the next time the lab will be conducted.…
- 544 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Day 2 of the experiment was performed on April 23, 2013. More testing was done on both apparatus’ in order to obtain enough data for error propagation.…
- 6399 Words
- 26 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Although this experiment is supports the hypothesis enough to arrive at a conclusion like the one above, it did have some sources of error that might have affected the measurements therefore leading to invalid results. Some of these errors…
- 1267 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
You have to be very precautious while doing this experiment. Here are reasons/possible errors that could have been…
- 488 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The first part of this section discusses the observations and results of the lab as well as any mistakes that may have been made (or what measures were taken to try to avoid mistakes) and what improvements, if any, you can think of for the procedure for the next time the lab will be conducted.…
- 382 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The mechanical advantage of the machine built was 29.2. Each simple machine incorporated in the design added to the mechanical advantage. The fixed pulley system had an advantage of one because the pulley changed the rubber band’s direction once. The three sets of wheel and axles used each provided a 8.4 mechanical advantage. The two gear sets produced a mechanical advantage of two: one from each gear…
- 480 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
2.)Record container mass (empty), Record container with mealworms, Record mass of potato and lastly record mass of BTB. Do all this before experiment and after experiment.…
- 253 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
One of the main things that we could improve was getting an average of our results. As we only got one set of results this meant that our results were not very reliable, as we had not repeated the experiment. In our main experiment we had to make sure that we repeated our experiment at least 3 times so that we could calculate the average for the results.…
- 1097 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
PURPOSE: The purpose of this set of experiments (3 total) is to become familiar with the common types of laboratory…
- 14806 Words
- 86 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Potential sources of error in this lab were: experiment was conducted once rather than three times, water in the sink was not cold enough, water in the beaker was not hot enough, lack of a working Bunsen burner…
- 301 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The preliminary showed that the experiment worked. The timeframe is not too long or short…
- 941 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays