Preview

Distribution Systems in Post Classical China(Tang Dynasty) and the Byzantine Empire

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
730 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Distribution Systems in Post Classical China(Tang Dynasty) and the Byzantine Empire
Stella Boye-Doe

CC Essay- Tang China and the Byzantine Empire

During the postclassical period from 600 to 1450 CE empires, such as the Tang dynasty in China and the Byzantine Empire, used new methods of equal land distribution in their societies. Each empire had very distinct methods for organizing the distribution of land in their empires.For the Tang dynasty land was distributed according to the equal field system while in the Byzantine empire land was given according to the theme system. The land distribution systems were designed to keep order by not allowing a large concentration of land towards certain families ,and how they were organized was at times according to the political system of the empire, as well as who the land was given by, who received the land and how.Both empires used these systems to provide stability for a short term. The equal field system in China became a foundation of stability and prosperity to rural areas. Also in the Byzantine empire the theme system made the empire stronger and able to expand. These systems got rid of possibilities of social tensions between those with great amounts of land and those with little.

In the Tang dynasty the equal field system was used but in the Byzantine empire the theme system was used. Each system was organized in it’s own way for that empire. In China the equal field system was introduced as an improvement from the land distribution techniques of Han China that had surcumb to the pressure of higher classes taking most of the land and causing dispute in communities. For the equal field system agricultural land was given to individuals and/or families based on the fertility of the land and how much was needed by the receivers. From the land given 1/5 th was kept to pass into the next line of the person’s family and the remainder of that was redistributed when the receiver didn’t need as much land or faced better circumstances. By doing this land was not hoarded by a single family and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    System that divided land to be cultivated by peasants of a village into several large fields, which were in turn cut up into narrow strips, individual or peasant family held scattered strips, farmed each field as a community. Common lands were set aside for herd and natural pasture. Eastern European peasants worked some days without pay.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, the political systems in Han China and Imperial Rome were different, contributing to the sophistication of issues of its control. In China, a strong centralized government was established. The distribution of power was based upon kinship. The brothers were sent to govern the other provinces. The matrix was influenced by…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    APUSH outline

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages

    REASONS #1: Empires took advantage of specific skills and knowledge given to them. Han for silk weaving and Gupta for textiles.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although both Han China and Imperial Rome had large, long lasting empires with similar economies and some similar policies centralized governments and similar administrative policies regarding land reform, their techniques of imperial administration differed in terms of how it came to be and how emperors ruled.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial administration in Imperial Rome from 31 B.C.E. to 476 C.E and Han China from 206 B.C.E to 220 C.E. had both their similarities and differences. Similarities include general idea of equality, living under one ruler who gives the people some control, and the roles of families. One major difference is the method of political control with religion, and the way their leaders were selected.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The development of traditions and institutions in Mediterranean World and the Han period of Chinese history were momentous in the development of each society’s culture and identity. The Han, Romans, and Greeks all had strict family structures and gender rules and the Han and Romans both had a unique system of assimilating the peoples they conquered into their society. But the societies also were different, for example, the Roman and Greek religion was very different from Chinese religion, mostly because the Chinese did not have a national religion and more of a national philosophy (Confucianism) then a religion like Greece or Rome had. Additionally, while the Han ruled through Emperors, the many Greek city-states had a monarchy, oligarchy, or a democracy.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Rome and Han experienced great times of prosperity. However, both regions also suffered political instability due to unequal land distribution, which led to their demise. Both Rome and Han developed monarchies with aristocrats as aides to the emperors. In these systems the wealthy controlled a majority of the land, thus causing…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were multiple similar factors that led to the social rise of the Roman and Han Empires. In the Roman Empire, there were the patron/client relationships which helped social welfare and brought loyalty to the upper classes from the lower ones. This relationship was similar to the Han Empire’s Confucianism which stressed order and hierarchy which strengthened the stability and loyalty to the government and the right and responsibilities of individuals. Another similar…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Han China and Imperial Rome had a political system structure consisting of a sovereign emperor who made executive, almost dictator-like, decisions and directed the affairs of the empire. However, in both empires, emperors relied on regional governors to regulated affairs in their respective regions due to the fact that both empires were so massive and consisted of an enormous population.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the time period 600 B.C.E to 600 C.E the world had many large empires controlling lots land, and two controlled their empires similarly.One of these is the Roman Empire who originally was a republic that had a large bureaucracy that made the decisions, but later on Caesar Augustus took over complete control and claimed divine power. When Caesar Augustus took over the bureaucracy lost all its power and the emperor gained that power. The other empire is the Gupta of India which was a not very centralized government but had a emperor that claimed divine power. The Gupta also did not have a very large bureaucracy like the Romans. The Roman Empire and the Gupta Empire both had a emperor at the center with a small bureaucracy, but the Gupta gave some power to their local officials.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Han and Rome

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Han China and Roman empires were similar and different in many ways. The Rome and Han had multiple characteristics in common such as a (s1) patriarchal society, in which women were inferior to men, (s2) upper level social classes, and (s3) both containing a large gap between the rich and poor. However, these dynasties also contrasted in many areas. For example, the (d1) Romans had many slaves, which were used for agriculture and business production, while the Han did not. These empires also had (d2) varying ways in which their household was run, such as pater familias and filial piety, as well as the (d3) role of women was different among the two empires.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the fall of the Han Dynasty in the early second century, China had fallen into an era of civil unrest that would last for nearly four centuries. It was not until the Sui Dynasty that China would be restored to a unified state that could be productive and expansive once again. Although the Sui, Tang, and Song dynasty would all follow similar footsteps of the successful Han Dynasty, they each made small innovations to the political systems, religious foundations, and social lives that allowed them to prosper and rebound from civil unrest. With these changes from the Han Dynasty, they were able to prove that any empire can rebound with proper policies in place.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    China and India were two of the greatest classical civilizations in human history. They both possessed elaborate societal levels and castes that defined the way that their citizens lived, with India having an official caste system, while China had a pecking order of Lords, famer-peasants, and “mean” people. However, India was made up of diverse and unstable empires, while China was usually unified under a single ruler in a line of kings, making it a far more powerful and politically successful nation than India. We can analyze these two civilizations using their governments, religions, and cultures.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The civilization of classical Greece and China has a lot to compare and contrast. Though formulated in different region and climate with different ancestors, they have some points in common; yet, there are also marked differences.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    water cycle

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Write two short paragraphs, one discussing how Tang and Song emperors strengthened Chinas empire and the other discussing how they weakened it…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays