Distributive Justice Essay

Distributive justice is the fair distribution of society’s advantages and disadvantages, or benefits and burdens, including income, property, employment, rights, taxes, and public service (p.723) the theory believes to be the most persuasive and yet gratifying solution for all people. As identified in the text the right to health care is not limited to duties that interfere with a person obtaining something and duties to help that person in her efforts to get something. (p.725) Distributive justice favors that people’s choices should solely be their choices and not discriminated or judged.
The theories and relationships within the entire context of this course have related to acts of distributive justice and have been the controversy on to how health care matters are being resolved today. As persuasive as distributive justices are of value and ethics, not everyone agrees or honors the notion. I believe the government has a utilitarian theory of justice approach to all matters of
I can only relate to this in my own behalf, the right for me to choice has been taken, and now I’m forced to accept a policy that takes my money because of my financial status, and the calculations are divided into a pot to help others while I’m hardly sick, and every need to go to the doctors (unless check-ups) but most of the funds are taken from me. In retrospect, a person who makes less than me pays less, is in dire need of health care assistance and receives the coverage on my dime. I never will agree with this logic for numerous reasons. Stipulations in experiencing things like this have brought me to not rule in favor of the utilitarian theory of justice, but the majority has ruled for me to respect it and bring the light of its disadvantages in hopes for it to one day change, not for the benefit of some but for the satisfaction for