Preview

Dividend Policy

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3895 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dividend Policy
Dividend Policy: Clientele Effects and Signalling Model

Literature Review

Sharon Theresia
17132233
Corporate Finance 307
Singapore Campus
Abstract
Two of the most influential dividend policies are being reviewed and compared. in this paper, clientele effects and signalling model are two chosen policies. Findings implied that clientele is shaped by tax preferences of shareholders which in the end will determine companies’ ideal dividend policies. It is also believed that amount of paid dividend reflects firms’ quality when asymmetric information exists (signalling model). However, information asymmetries are often caused by agency problems and make signalling model less reliable. Signalling model gives mix conclusion when r studies are utilising different research methods. Furthermore, signalling model is a less ideal dividend policy when it applies to non U.S. market such as Japan. Existed signalling model gives glimpses of possible explanations, but precise model is still yet to be found. Statement claims about dividend policy as puzzle seem to be the truest and valid explanation so far.

1. Introduction and Background

Corporate dividend policy has puzzled economists and researchers for a long time. Ongoing meticulous researches have been conducted through various empirical studies in order to understand companies’ dividend behaviour and shareholders’ preferences towards dividend payouts. Many theories have been stated and established as an effort to understand dividend policy better, however the relevance is still questionable and the issue is still yet to be resolved (Bhattacharyya 2007, 4). Dividend policy has a strong tie with the decision of utilizing company cash flows. Companies should determine their choices whether to retain cash flows and do reinvestment or distribute it to shareholders as payouts. Payouts themselves can be done in two ways which are dividend payments or shares repurchase.
Economists and researchers’ interests concerning

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Mini Case Chapter 17

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The dividend payout versus stock repurchase has changed dramatically during the past 30 years. First off the total cash distributions as a percentage of net income have remained the same fairly stable at around 26% to 28%, but the mix of dividends and repurchases has changed. The average dividend payout fell from 22.3% in 1974 to 13.8% in 1998, while the average repurchase payouts as a percentage of net income rose from 3.7% to 13.6%. Since 1985, large companies have repurchased more shares than they have issued. Ever since 1998, more cash has been returned to shareholders in repurchases then as dividend payouts. Second, companies today are less likely to pay a dividend. In 1978, about 66.5% of NYSE, AMEX, and Nasdaq firms paid a dividend. In 1999, only 20.8% paid a dividend. A portion of this reduction can be explained by the larger number of IPO’s in the 1990’s, since young firms rarely pay a dividend. Even though that doesn’t explain the whole story, as many mature firms now don’t pay dividends. Third is that relatively small number of older, more established, and more profitable firms accounts for most of the cash distributed as dividends and finally there is a considerable variation in distribution policies, as some companies pay a high percentage of their income as dividends and some pay none.…

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rosetta Stone Ipo

    • 4823 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Denis, D.J. & Osobov, I. (2008), "Why do firms pay dividends? International evidence on the determinants of dividend policy", journal of Financial Economics, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 62-82.…

    • 4823 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This case is designed to provide an introduction to payout policy and Modigliani and Miller’s dividend irrelevance proof. Consideration is given to why profitable technology firms like Cisco Systems, Microsoft and Intel used no debt, retained large cash balances and preferred to return cash to shareholders in the form of repurchases rather than dividends; how the tax and market environment for dividends has changed over time; and what impact the proposed dividend tax reforms and market environment of 2003 will have on future payout policy.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    505 Quiz 1

    • 852 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Frankfuter, M, George and Wood Bob, G (2003). Dividend Policy Theory and Practice” Academic Press…

    • 852 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dividend Decision

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages

    15.4 Dividend Irrelevance Theory: Miller and Modigliani Model 15.5 Stability of Dividends 15.6 Forms of Dividends 15.7 Stock Split 15.8 Summary Terminal Questions Answers to SAQs and TQs 15.1 Introduction Dividends are that portion of a firm’s net earnings paid to the shareholders. Preference shareholders are entitled to a fixed rate of dividend irrespective of the firm’s earnings. Equity holders’ dividends fluctuate year after year. It depends on what portion of earnings is to be retained by the firm and what portion is to be paid off. As dividends are distributed out of net profits, the firm’s decisions on retained earnings have a bearing on the amount to be distributed. Retained earnings constitute an important source of financing investment requirements of a firm. However, such opportunities should have enough growth potential and sufficient profitability. There is an inverse relationship between these two – larger retentions, lesser dividends and vice versa. Thus two constituents of net profits are always competitive and conflicting. Dividend policy has a direct influence on the two components of shareholders’ return – dividends and capital gains. A low payout and high retention may have the effect of accelerating earnings growth. Investors of growth companies realize their money in the form of capital gains. Dividend yield will be low for such companies. The influence of dividend policy on future capital gains is to happen in…

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dividend Policy at Fpl

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1994, Merrill Lynch published a report that disclosed the change in their investment rating for the FPL Group, Inc.. They had downgraded this rating as they expected the directors would choose not to raise the annual dividend. This also happened to be the first time in 47 years that the FPL Group had not raised dividends. This tweaked the interest of a certain electric utilities analyst at the First Equity Securities Corporation, Kate Stark. She now was faced with the decision whether or not to amend her own recommendation of “hold” on FPL Group, Inc.’s stock (her recommendation of hold was based on the assumption that FPL will keep its dividend at $2.48 per share, or increase this slightly).…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wrigley Case

    • 887 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In order to maximize shareholder value, one option to consider is issuing debt to pay out an equivalent dividend. It is important to note that increasing your debt will lead to a higher net income. In turn, this money can be used to increase dividend payments or maintain them if the firm is falling behind. In general, shareholders will prefer dividends as opposed to return of capital gain, the latter being more risky. According to the Modigliani–Miller dividend irrelevance theory, your dividend policy will not affect the value/risk of the firm. On the other hand, Gordon and Lintner believe a stock’s risk declines as dividends increase. These financial experts both present important theories to consider.…

    • 887 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Managerial Finance Paper

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As a part of the course Managerial Finance, we had the opportunity to prepare a term paper on Dividend policy and capital structure of the following DSE listed firms-…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Finance

    • 5497 Words
    • 57 Pages

    the U.S. financial markets, still others had opportunistic reasons. Now, Ashley Swenson’s dividenddecision problem was compounded by the dilemma of whether to use company funds to pay…

    • 5497 Words
    • 57 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    The objective of this paper is to (1) critically review some of the factors that influences dividend policy of firms from a theoretical perspective (2) Analyze the last five-year dividend policy of Apple Inc. and Dell Inc. and discuss the factors that has influenced dividend policy in these firms over the period considered.…

    • 4738 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dividend Policy

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Dividend policy is concerned with taking a decision regarding paying cash dividend in the present or paying an increased dividend at a later stage. The firm could also pay in the form of stock dividends which unlike cash dividends do not provide liquidity to the investors, however, it ensures capital gains to the stockholders. The expectations of dividends by shareholders helps them determine the share value, therefore, dividend policy is a significant decision taken by the financial managers of any company.…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of Dividend

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Figure 13A-1 illustrates the three alternative dividend policy theories: (1) Miller and Modigliani’s dividend irrelevance theory, (2) Gordon and Lintner’s bird-in-thehand theory, and (3) the tax preference theory. To understand the three theories, consider the case of Hardin Electronics, which has from its inception plowed all earnings back into the business and thus has never paid a dividend. Hardin’s management is now reconsidering its dividend policy, and it wants to adopt the policy that will maximize its stock price. Consider first the data presented below the graph. Each row shows an alternative payout policy: (1) Retain all earnings and pay out nothing, which is the present policy; (2) pay out 50 percent of earnings; and (3) pay out 100 percent of earnings. In the example, we assume that the company will have a 15 percent ROE regardless of which payout policy it follows, so with a book value per share of $30, EPS will be $4.50 under all payout policies.1 Given an EPS of $4.50, dividends per 0.15($30) share are shown in Column 3 under each payout policy. Under the assumption of a constant ROE, the growth rate shown in Column 4 will be g (% Retained)(ROE), and it will vary from 15 percent at a zero payout to zero at a 100 percent payout. For example, if Hardin pays out 50 percent of its earnings, then its dividend growth rate will be g 0.5(15%) 7.5%. Columns 5, 6, and 7 show how the situation would look if MM’s irrelevance theory were correct. Under this theory, neither the stock price nor the cost of equity would be affected by the payout policy—the stock price would remain constant at $30, and ks would be stable at 15 percent. Note that ks is found as the sum of the growth rate in Column 4 plus the dividend yield in Column 6. Columns 8, 9, and 10 show the situation if the bird-in-the-hand theory were true. Under this theory, investors prefer…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dividend Decision

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Dividend policy is basically concerned with deciding whether to pay dividend in cash now or to pay increased dividends at a later stage or distribution of profits in the form of bonus shares. The current dividend provides liquidity to the investors but the bonus share will bring capital gains to the sh.hol. The investors preferences between current cash dividend and future capital gain have been viewed differently. The basic question to be resolved while framing the dividend policy : ‘Given the firm’s investments and financing decisions, what is the effect of firm’s dividend policies on the share prices?’. Does a high dividend payment decrease, increase or does not affect at all the share prices. Various models have been proposed to evaluate the dividend policy decision in relation to the value of the firm…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dividend Policy

    • 2036 Words
    • 9 Pages

    2. Income Conscious Investors. The second factor favoring stable dividend policy is that some investors are income conscious and favor a stable rate of dividend. They too, never favour an unstable rte of dividend. A Stable dividend policy may also satisfy such investors.…

    • 2036 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Financial management

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Relevant dividend view: Farrar, Salwyn and Gordon are representatives of this theory. Their theory is that company 's dividend distribution has an impact on the value of the company. Dividend payment is not dispensable, but very necessary. It is an important strategy of a company. If the company’s choice of the dividend payment policy on the stock market changes , the company 's capital structure and corporate value will be affected, as well as the realization of shareholders ' wealth. Dividend policy is closely related to the value of the company.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays