Preview

Divorce Decree

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1400 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Divorce Decree
Divorce Decree
Susan Wiseman
Kaplan University
Family Law
PA250
Jessica Gauvin
July 29, 2013

Divorce Decree At the Matrimonial/LSA Part of Massachusetts State Supreme Court at the Courthouse, Suffolk County, on July 30, 2013
Present:
Hon. Justice/Referee
_________________________________________________X
Plaintiff, Index No.:
-against- Calender Nol. Defendant. Judgment of Divorce
___________________________________________________X

1. This action was submitted to the court for consideration this date (on inquest of July 30, 2013).
2. The Defendant was served pursuant to court order dated July 20, 2013 within the state of Massachusetts.
3. Plaintiff presented a verified complaint.
4. The Defendant has appeared and waived his right to answer.
5. The court accepted oral proof of non-military service.
6. The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    E4-16, E4-19, E4-22 Judgment Case 4-9 on page 227, E5-3 on page 275, and E5-10.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Petitioner is represented by the law firm Sullivan & Hart, which submitted all pleadings to the court and whose name was featured within the signature block of each document throughout the suit. (Id.) During discovery Respondent issued several request which were properly served to Petitioner’s counsel,…

    • 2537 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exhibit 16.5 is a final pretrial order for the United States District court for the Northern District of Illinois. The case on the pretrial order is Austin Bennaza vs Buddy Smith. The notice states stipulations and statements that deal with the case. It details each parties current state as well as their part in the case. It states what each party owes the other in dealing with the case. It also states how long the trial should take. It allocates specific time to each task associated with the case. The document needs to be prepared and submitted jointly by opposing trial counsel. The pretrial order also needs to be signed by the pretrial judge.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Study

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Procedural History: Mapp petition for a writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court for the appreal from the Supreme Court of Ohio.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To: Plaintiff Justin King and his attorney, Jane Doe, 123 Main Street, Chicago, IL 60601…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On 09/10/15 the defendant was instructed to report on 09/11/15 @1:00 pm to CSO Santiago, and pick up bus pass. The defendant did not report as instructed. CSO Santiago attempted to contact the defendant via telephone left message to report no later that 4:00pm on this date. If not the defendant need to contact CSO Vasquez on Monday 09/4/15.…

    • 59 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wilke, Fleury, Hoffelt, Gould & Birney, David A. Frenznick and Anthony J. DeCristoforo, for Defendant Robert Del Pero.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ADJ Midterm

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    was presented, it was a civil case in terms of child custody and a request of trial by jury.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Litigation Unit 3

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JUSTIN WILLIAM KING, ) ) Plaintiff. ) ) ) v. ) ) ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) COMPLAINT Comes Now the plaintiff, Justin King, by and through his attorney, states as follows: PARTIES AND JURISDICTION 1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of Cook County, State of Illinois. 2. Defendant is a corporation with its principal place of business in Missouri and carries on business in Illinois. 3. This court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims presented in this complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because plaintiff is a resident of Illinois and the defendant is a citizen of Missouri and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of fees and costs. 4. Personal jurisdiction and venue are proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because the acts of defendant caused harm to plaintiff in Cook County, in United States Court for the Northern District of Illinois. COUNT I: ________ 5. On or about April 8, 2011, plaintiff Justin King, while in the exercise of due care, was operating his motorcycle on Interstate 57, heading in a south direction, in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 6. On the occasion in question, defendant, Frank Cuellar, a resident of Illinois, was operating a truck owned by Anheuser-Busch as its agent, and was traveling in a south direction on Interstate 57, so called, a public highway in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 7. On the occasion in question, plaintiff Justin King was traveling south on Interstate 57 in Paxton, IL on his motorcycle when he noticed a truck with Anheuser-Busch logo traveling behind him headed in the same direction. The plaintiff noticed Mr. Cuellar flashing his headlights requesting to pass the plaintiff and proceeded to switch lanes. Justin King then changed lanes to the right hand lane…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Justin King Answer

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of the County of…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    First Defendant Summary

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The First Defendant, Second Defendant and Third Defendant, collectively as the ‘Defendants’, refer to the 29th of March 2017 statement of claim and say:…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    THIS CAUSE having come on to be heard before the Court upon the Wife’s Complaint for Divorce, and the Husband’s Counter Complaint for Divorce, and the Court having scheduled a Final Hearing for June 17, 2012, and the parties and their respective counsel having appeared before the Court on said date, and the parties having established residency during the Final Hearing, and the Court being otherwise fully advised the premises finds that:…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arkansas Divorce Packet

    • 3112 Words
    • 13 Pages

    We are providing this information as a public service. We try to make it accurate. Sometimes the laws change. We cannot promise that the information is always up-to-date and correct. We do not intend this information to be legal advice. We do not intend it as advertising or solicitation. By providing this information, we are not acting as your lawyer. Always talk to a competent lawyer, if you can, before taking legal action.…

    • 3112 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Florida Consent Decree is a legal document that address the civil rights of English Language Learners (ELL) students. This document focuses on their rights to equal opportunity and/or access to all of the educational programs within the education system. The Consent Decree makes sure that these students will be provided with a clear and appropriate instruction that way it balances the playing field; that way the student has a better chance of being successful. The Florida Consent Decree is broken up into six sections that touch on a broad range of aspects and how it affects the student, school system, and school employees. The first section is called Identification and Assessment.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Affiant hereby makes application to_____________Judge ________________ a judge of the Circuit/District Court for Chesapeake County, MD for a Search and Seizure Warrant on the grounds that there is probable cause, the basis of which is set forth in the following affidavit which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, to believe that there is property subject to seizure under the laws of this State and more particularly in violation of the Criminal Law Article, specifically, the crimes of ____Manufacturing and Possessing Methamphetamine With an Intent to Distribute.___________________________________.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays