Preview

Do Words Matter?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1035 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Do Words Matter?
Do Words Matter? Words are very powerful, and sometimes the words we use offend people. Freedom of speech is highly valued but what happens when your freedom becomes hurtful or disrespectful to someone else? There are so many different kinds of people and different things that offend each person. In this day where we are more inclined to say whatever we want, we see more and more offense being taken to the words that get said. It's hard to understand why certain words can be insulting to someone when it may not seem that way to you. We have to ask ourselves, why do we care what other people say and should we censer everything that goes into the public just so people don't get offended? In the article, "You Can't Say That," the author Diane Ravitch talks about how certain words are deleted from books or not shown in films because they could offend certain groups. In the article, Ravitch argues that although it may seem like we live in a world where anything goes, the truth is, that's not true. Diane does research and gathers a list of more than five hundred words that regularly get deleted from textbooks and tests. Some of the words include cowboy, brotherhood, yacht, and primitive. Personally I believe that the censoring of words these days is somewhat extreme. I understand that certain groups could be offended by such words but why should everyone else not get the original words the author is trying to write because of that. By removing any words that might offend anyone are we subconsciously trying to make everyone the same? Ravitch writes, "The great irony of sensitivity reviewing: it has evolved into a bureaucratic system that removes all evidence of diversity." Sensitivity

reviewing was originally supposed to encourage diversity. In the end it is actually making everyone identical and causing misguided equality. For example, if we are trying to tell of a horrible time in history but we can only use words that are "politically correct," it's

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Words become offensive when it is addressed to a person by another person when other people feel offended as well as the person that it is directed too. It exceeds the limits of free speech of the First Amendment to U.S. Constitution because this Amendment does not include lewd and obscene language. The words the that he used were known as ‘ fighting words.’ Fighting words are words that, by their utterance can inflict injury or immediate breach the peace. These words are excluded from the court. The words that Chaplinsky used could have easily forced someone to retaliate. Although we do have the right of freedom of speech, that doesn’t necessarily mean that every word that we say are according to…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I comprehend Alan M Dershowitz’s speech of “A Real Test For Any Proposed Speech Code or Policy” as accurate because it can not be up to citizens to decide which words are offensive and which words are appropriate. More specifically, I believe that adding restrictions to Americans freedom of speech would be in total violation of the First Amendment and completely unrealistic to enforce. For example, Alan Dershowitz’s states "the proper response to offensive speech is to criticize and answer it, not censor it.” Although Harvard Law might counter this by saying that they didn’t want anyone at their school to view the offensive words of Tom Paulin. I maintain that freedom of speech is part of our foundation in America and we need to use it to benefit…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Bill of Rights, Amendment I states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” (Bill of Rights). These rights were basically protecting what people say, and write, however, we are slowly loosing those rights. We have to worry now about offending someone because of our language, or saying something that is considered politically incorrect. A quote that has made a big difference in my perception when dealing with people is “You can please some of the people all of the time, you can please all of the people some of the time, but you can’t please all of the people all of the time”. (Lydgate) As I grow older, I see this to be so true. If you look around, you see people being offended more and more. When you please one group, then another group will be offended. There is no way to please everyone, even with claiming terms are politically correct/incorrect. We are in a vicious cycle of using a word in the proper context, it being misused, being changed to a politically correct word, then the word being misused again.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kakutani's "Word Police".

    • 1178 Words
    • 4 Pages

    "Political correctness" defined by Kakutani as "a vision of a more just, inclusive society in which racism, sexism and prejudice of all sorts have been erased," (421) has good intent, but the methods used by politically correct activists to achieve their goals are too extreme. This, in turn, will just lead to the "scorn of conservative opponents and the mockery of cartoonists and late-night television hosts" (421). To validate her claim, Kakutani uses the example of a woman changing "testimony" to "ovarimony" at a Modern Language Association. This illustration supports her claim…

    • 1178 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tropic Thunder Analysis

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The reason being that it comes with too big of a price and would be useless as a permanent solution. Bauer discusses the aftermath of Rahm Emanuel’s use of the R-word being that government fought to remove the term “mental retardation” from government agencies and state codes.They used this to contrast the origins of the word’s use, to convey dignity and respect. Their argument being that no matter how many times we purge words with negative connotations and replace them, taboos would just materialize once more, as can be seen in the replacement of the word idiot. Bauer also said that if a word is too stigmatized people develop what she calls a “word fetish”. This phenomena is backed by the writings of Harvard law professor Randall Kennedy, making it credible information. The example provided to back both claims was the case of David Howard nearly being fired for using the word “niggardly”. Overall Bauer’s evidence for this claim support her arguments well. She makes it clear that restrictions on speech create needless taboos and government restriction.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He states that political correctness doesn’t just harm individuals as they can be harassed and persecuted for what they way, but he says that it has broader consequences on the cultural mindset. Other reasons include, “Declining educational standards, increasing secularism, the police not being allowed to do their job, and inability to secure her [America’s] borders, a diminished America in the world theatre and reluctance to smash the evil of currently rampaging Islamism— all of it is rooted in politically-correct ideology.” These ideas are some of the reasons behind the author’s…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Offensive speech should be protected under the First Amendment. If speech could be prosecuted on the basis of being offensive to someone, nobody would be able to speak because everything people say has the ability to offend someone. People would no longer be able to question the government or its employees because it could be viewed as offensive, and some could even argue that specific religions are offensive. By not protecting seemingly offensive speech, it could lead to a slippery slope complex that could potentially infringe upon other rights. Moreover, any further restriction of free speech would hinder the marketplace of ideas, in turn discouraging open discourse and the spread of ideas.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If those words had followed the saying that we have been told since we were young, why do people feel like they are being judged? At a safe distance he called, “He is nothing but a nigger-lover!” “He is not! I roared. “I don’t know what you’re talking about, but you better cut it out…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The adage “sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me” is erroneous. The use of politically incorrect language may not break bones but it does inflict pain. As specified by Peg Streep, there is a connection between emotional and physical pain, so when a person is emotionally distraught, it can be compared to the pain felt when being physically harmed (Streep). According to “A Word Gone Wrong” by Lawrence Downes, words hold insinuations (Downes). For example, the word “retard” denotes a mentally handicapped person, but it connotes a person that is considered an imbecile. The word “retard” was not established to inflict pain on the people in which it defines; however, it has…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While people may die, words will not. The textbooks we read in school are created for the use of passing on knowledge and valuable information. By record keeping, we do not forget events or words from the past. While some words or opinions may not be what we want to hear, it’s vital for us to take into consideration other viewpoints besides our own in order to open our eyes to the world around us. In Ray Bradbury’s book “Fahrenheit 451”, the plot is set in a society where books are banned in order to avoid conflict created from others being “offended” by what a book may say. This, however, is putting an end to individuality. By living in a world where anything that could potentially cause upset is forbidden, society becomes uniform. The color and variety of life, whether good or bad, is erased and our lives become bland. This in itself destroys a culture.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People are entitled to one of the rights listed in the first amendment, the freedom of speech. It’s true that some people are hateful but even if we don’t like, agree, or even joke about it we don’t have the right to control them. People are unable to express their thoughts and feelings because they do not want to offend others.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    People sometimes tell others something that they say is not politically correct and it offends them, but then they refuse to explain what is so terrible and offensive about what the person just said. It is to a point where people seem to be offended by everything. Being too politically correct is hindering societies’ ability to rationally solve problems.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite originating in early 1990, the term political correctness did not gain notable traction until more recent years. Today the term political correctness is aimlessly thrown about in the political arena from both sides of the aisle-but what does the term truly mean? Does it achieve its purpose? To fully understand the complexities surrounding this ideology, one must first examine the raw intention and foundation of the term. Political correctness is wildly accepted as the avoidance of expressions, actions, or microaggressions that can be perceived to offend, marginalize, or exclude specific groups of people who are inherently socially disadvantaged and/or discriminated against. However well intended the terms roots may be, political correctness in America has rose to a dangerously high level; the unwavering effort by the politically correct conscious to avoid offending any certain group or individual has lead to a highly sensitive, censored, and tip-toeing society.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freedom of speech is a beautiful idea. As a matter of fact, the first amendment itself is perhaps the greatest amendment in the Bill of Rights. As something that we take for granted most of the time, we never truly realize how much of a blessing it is to speak your mind and have decent conversations with each other. However, if you want it to rain, you have to deal with the mud and there are many examples of people spitting out stupid ideas or thoughts that should be kept to themselves.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I suspect that no community will become humane and caring by restricting what its members can say. The worst offenders will simply find other ways to irritate and insult.”…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays