The consequential theory is when a person is concerned what the consequences would be after they do something or make a choice that was not right. Consequential theory is the nature of a secondary result, meaning that it can have significant consequences. “The two major consequentialist ethical theories are ethical egoism and utilitarianism” (Otto, 2014, p. 30). These two theories state that people should act in ways that bring good consequences. Both ethical egoism and utilitarianism do differ in the fact that they do disagree on who exactly should benefit from consequences. The ethical egoism says that people …show more content…
This is because people know what they are doing when they are judging people and acting virtuously. People should act in particular ways but also while feeling these ways so they can emphasize the creation of a virtuous character within themselves. “The idea is to decide what the practically wise and virtuous human being would do in any situation involving moral choice, and then do likewise” (Otto, 2014, p. 68). One example from consequential theory that works for them is the Universal Ethical Egoism. This is because they would do what was in the best interest for everyone not just for themselves. “This theory does not state only what the individual should do; rather, it concerns itself with what all human beings should do if they want to be moral” (Otto, 2014, p.33). This theory says to act in your own self-interest which can ring true especially if you always do what is right and what you believe is the right thing to do. An example of a nonconsequential theory that would not work for my family or friends is the divine command theory because it can be hard not to judge someone as being moral or immoral especially when they are making bad choices that can hurt others or themselves. Everyone believes in something different and that includes god. Most people would not buy that you acted in such a way because God told you to do so. When it comes to certain things, yes we absolutely look to a higher power, but not when faced with the choice to do something right or