Preview

Doctor-Assisted Suicide: Article Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
676 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Doctor-Assisted Suicide: Article Analysis
Life is a frail and fragile thing. Each of us considers it to be our most valuable possession given to us from a higher power. Some take it for granted, while some preserve and celebrate it. In a moment’s notice the breath of life can be taken without consent. I was presented with a piece of editorial, to discuss and decipher its contents. I will present my thoughts and answer the questions posted in the editorial.
1. The major claim of this editorial, is that legalized doctor-assisted suicide is euthanasia. We are asking for the right to decide though the court system, if an individual’s life is valuable or not. Some may claim we are just hiding or heartless nature and corrupt moral standards to justify our actions.
2. The author defines doctor-assisted
…show more content…
It is difficult for me to deduce if there are any informal fallacies in this editorial. My point of view on this topic is bias. I would say that “6’ and “10” is an informal fallacy. It does not support the editorial. It is not supporting evidence but, merely an opinion rooted in emotion.
6. The author convinced me of his position. He provides evidence on the direction of healthcare, spirituality, morality and human behavior. We should not appoint or seek legal authority to have doctors play god. In my opinion, having a doctor perform such a task will eventually break his psyche. He or she might find it easier to convince love ones to pursue death as the final choice. Doctors are supposed to be caretakers and healers, not the Grim Reaper. The question I would ask myself and others would be, “Why must he or she be burdened with the sins of another and answer to god for the choice we make.”
7. One problems I find with the editorial was the idea to predict future outcome. Although there is evidence that suggest a possible outcome, it does not mean that it will occur in an unknown future. Point “9” is invalid because we do condone the killing of the unborn. One major flaw I found in the editorial was citation. There aren’t any. I cannot tell if it was fabricated to convince a group of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The author examines the moral and ethical dilemma of a physician who take part in euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. He distinguishes the difference between passive euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Anson notes, that passive euthanasia is more acceptable due to the similarities of the American Medical Association's Code of Medical Ethics guidelines for withholding or removing life-sustaining intervention. However, the article also implied contradictions in the Hippocratic Oath against active euthanasia. Moreover, Anson examines the ideas based on proponents' views for active euthanasia, which patients who utilize life support systems are suffering agonizing and "leading to an undignified death". Although the article differs…

    • 146 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The purpose of The Bill of Rights was to “address any concerns that the Constitution did not mention” (bill of rights). It was written to protect citizens from excessive government power. Supporters of the Constitution realized that adding a bill of rights to the document was a safer option rather than creating another Constitution. This document was written in December 15, 1791 by James Madison.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a doctor, you swear to an oath that is to provide lifesaving medical care and to try and extend life comfortably, the best way you can. In “Physician-Assisted Suicide Is Always Wrong” Ryan T. Anderson states why a physician assisting in a terminally ill patient’s death is ethically and morally wrong. This article that I chose was published on Newsweek on March 26, 2015, but first appeared on The Daily Signal. As the article describes what and how this particular approach works, it goes in great detail to explain why it should not even be an option for physicians.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people have different opinions on Physician assisted suicide like if it is inhuman and if the illness can affect the patient's ability to make decisions.. Many people debate whether terminally ill patients should have the choice of suicide. Whether people think it is good or bad, many terminally ill patients do not want to suffer and feel they are being forced to die a slow and painful death.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) and euthanasia is a widely debated and controversial topic in our society. It is believed that the principle of PAS and euthanasia portrays, “merciful acts that deliver terminally ill patients from painful and protracted death” (page 477, column 2). In the paper, “Physician-Assisted Suicide: A Tragic View,” John D. Arras discusses the subject and states that while he agrees with patients making decisions, implementing laws supporting PAS and euthanasia is a huge threat to our social order. However, John D. Arras also concludes that he does not disapprove with the possibility of having a legislative policy in favor of PAS/euthanasia, only if there is “sufficient evidence of reliability of various safeguards” (page 477, column 2).…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physician-Assisted Suicide

    • 2476 Words
    • 10 Pages

    How is physician-assisted suicide any different than regular suicide? Does the fact that a person is terminally ill make it right? Who gets to decide if it is right? These are questions people may ask themselves when deciding whether or not they think physician-assisted suicide is ethical. Whether it is requested or not, many would say it is unethical for a physician to deliberately cause death to a person. Physicians take an oath to first do no harm. Others may say that a person has the right to make his or her own decisions about his or her life. In this paper, I will explore each side of physician-assisted suicide and how it relates to virtue ethics, along with how I feel relativist would see the issue.…

    • 2476 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Physician-Assisted Suicide

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Why it is unjust and unmoral to approve of medical assistants in the pursuit of death, such as suicide if the patients ask for such help? There are two side to every argument, there are some people that believe that is is morally ethical to receive PAS (Physician-Assisted Suicide). Then, of course there’s the opposing side to the debate in which this paper will cover and that side is :The medical practice is PAS is unjust, unmoral and shouldn’t be legalized for the fact the the will of life out powers a moment of misery.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most people would agree that the right of a competent, terminally ill person to avoid any unnecessary excruciating pain seems as though it should be a basic human right. To have someone go through more suffering than absolutely necessary seems as though it would fall under the description of an inhumane act, and frankly an injustice against the basic human right of bodily autonomy and integrity. Due to these almost undeniable arguments, physician assisted suicide, in many cases, is seen as a basic human right that we need to be granted access to. Activists argue that it is simply an additional choice that we will be able to make, and that it will surely never be pushed onto anybody or used sinisterly (Maynard 2014). Although this claim is something that we cannot be entirely sure of, as I have continued to research the pros and cons behind physician assisted suicide, I have come to the conclusion that in many cases it truly does seem that the legalization of physician assisted suicide is the best option for everyone involved. It is a means to cease any unnecessary suffering that a person may be going though, and provides a sense of comfort for them during a time in their lives where they are not given many choices besides to deal with what they are going through and try to survive. Additionally, with many of the extreme medical advancements of the 20t century, our goals have been clouded by the quest to…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Supreme Court cited the New York State Task Force on Life (a commission composed of doctors, ethicists, lawyers, religious leaders, and interested laymen), which commission warned that “[l]egalizing physician-assisted suicide would pose profound risks to many individuals who are ill and vulnerable”, especially those lacking money, and good medical care. The Court stated that if physician-assisted suicide were permitted, many persons might resort to it to spare their family the substantial financial burden of end-of-life healthcare costs.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    We have countless rights protected by the United States such as freedom of speech, due process of law, and freedom of religion to name a few. Most importantly, we have the right to life. In the opening of the Declaration of Independence, the very thing our country was founded upon, it is said, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” (The Declaration of Independence: A Transcription). We do not, however, have the right to die. We have no right to end our own life, particularly by way of physician-assisted suicide. Although…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine being terminally ill and being told by a doctor that there is only have six months left to live and that those next six months will wither the body down to nothing through pain and suffering. Physician-assisted suicide could save many Americans from this nightmarish reality that terminally ill patients face today. If physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia was legal in the United States, months of suffering and a loss of dignity and autonomy could be spared. Therefore, physician-assisted suicide, in the style Oregon employs, should be legalized and available to suffering patients across the United…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The topic of Physician Assisted Suicide has become a well-known issue. But the fact is, for terminally ill and for those that cannot recover, Physician assisted suicide is not completely misguided. It gives those who are in a lot of pain a chance to save their loved ones the torment of seeing them so feeble. It also strengthens the possibility of saving those who can still be saved.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Every life is precious”... wise words from Rick perry in which many people believe. But there are some, who believe different. They believe that life can be taken by anyone at any time, on purpose. My teammate and I believe physician assisted suicide should not be legal in the United States. Think about all the amazing and talented people we have in this world. Albert Einstein, a German physicist had many accomplishments throughout his lifetime. The most notable award was the Nobel Prize in Physics and he also had a high influence on the philosophy of science. Martin Luther King Jr.; one of the leaders of the civil rights movements. Without his influence in the U.S., who know where our society would be today. Charles Darwin,…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In her article, “Thank God Hippocrates Was Pagan”, Jennifer Lahl comments that many non-secular arguments against PAS are mostly ignored; however, arguments regarding the fairness of Death with Dignity laws are strong contenders over the debate regarding PAS (40). She questions whether it is right that only those who are terminally ill can legally end their suffering when others cannot since they are not terminal (Lahl 41). Her contention should be acknowledged when considering possible solutions since one of the pro-PAS arguments is that personal autonomy allows for choice. Another article, a critique written by Manne Sjöstrand, Gert Helgesson, Stefan Eriksson, and Niklas Juth, analyzes two anti-PAS points of view (226). Though Sjöstrand et al. do not argue against PAS, their analysis of protesters’ arguments contribute an unbiased overview of justifications the protesters provide regarding their stance (229). One argument considers autonomy to be a prudential value which should not be compromised by actions that prevent future autonomy, such as suicide (Sjöstrand et al. 227). The other, referred to as the Kantian argument, claims that suicide undermines the value of one’s person (Sjöstrand et al. 228). Where supporters of PAS believe personal autonomy grants patients the freedom the commit suicide, protesters believe the same personal autonomy should be…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    My essay topic is whether or not physician assisted suicide is morally permissible. I intend to argue that it is permissible because a competent patient ultimately has the right to choose for themselves the course of their life, including how it will end. To lie in a hospital bed in a vegetative state, unable to see, think, speak, eat, being totally unaware of your surroundings or those of your loved ones nearby speaks loudly of the pain and suffering at all levels for a terminally ill patient. Physician assisted suicide (PAS) is ethically justifiable in certain cases, most often those cases involving unrelenting suffering. While PAS is not legal in the United States, the Supreme Court has upheld individual states right to decide on the legality of it. The debate for PAS has been going for many centuries and the most common reason for the request of PAS were wanting to die in a dignified way, being in pain, being dependable on others for personal care, being tired of life and fearing future loss of control. PAS may be a rational choice for a person who is choosing to die to escape unbearable suffering and the physicians’ duty to alleviate suffering may, at times, justify the act of providing assistance with suicide. However, others have argued that PAS is unethical and runs directly counter to the traditional duty of the physician to preserve life. Furthermore, many argue if PAS were legal, abuses would take place.…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays