Both Jefferson and Henry believe that what they are doing is right, morally and in the eyes of God. In both speeches, they say that God approves of their actions of rebellion against the British. Jefferson says, “Our cause is just. Our union is perfect. Our internal sources are great, and if necessary, foreign assistance is undoubtedly attainable.” Both Jefferson and Henry maintain the idea that they are fighting because God commands them to do so. Since, at the time, theocracy was the main form of government for the colonists, the fact that God, supposedly, commended their actions, was another motivating factor in the decision to bear up arms. Also, if God approved, then there was no reason to compromise with the British. So, while Henry writes his speech from the perspective of a man who would like nothing more than to take up arms, without actually acknowledging that fact that the British had a superior fighting force, rationalist Thomas Jefferson writes his declaration after the battle, with a different perspective on the war. Throughout his essay, Jefferson maintains a calm, reasoning tone, as if working out the pieces of a long, complicated puzzle and stating the facts. Henry begins his speech with a mild, indifferent tone, but as he continues on, he becomes angry and passionate, suggesting that this was a cause that he cared deeply for. After all, Henry is famous for saying the words, “give me liberty, or give me death”. The colonists chose to go to war instead of trying to reconcile with the British because they believed that there was no workable compromise between their two contrasting views of state. So, even though many lives were lost in the Revolutionary War, the American colonists eventually won their freedom, and proved that enough determination can lead to success.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Patrick Henry's "Give Me Liberty" speech was propaganda used to persuade the American colonies to band together and fight for a nation independent from Great Britain. He starts the speech off by saying that the colonies efforts of trying to maintain the peace with Britain were not working. The colonists were angry with Parliament for passing Acts of taxation without representatives from the colonies being present to dispute them and wanted Parliament to repeal those Acts. Patrick says that their pleas were being disregarded and belittled by King George and Parliament. He then begins to say that the hope of regaining peace with Britain is no longer existent. The war had already started and the colonies must fight to keep their freedom and privileges…
- 370 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Patrick Henry gave a speech in 1775 to the Virginia Convention that convinced them to take action and fight back against Great Britain for their freedom because their methods of hope and petition failed to work. First, he used concession to opposition in the beginning of his speech to acknowledge the arguments and thoughts of the preceding speakers so that he could speak freely while he suggested treason. Secondly, he pointed out how despite the obvious facts of the start of a war, the convention continued to hope even without response from Britain. Henry stated, “Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with these war-like preparations which cover our waters and darken our land" (Henry). In addition, Henry contradicted…
- 285 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Reconciliation between Britain and her colonies had clearly failed. The Olive Branch Petition, originally written to make peace with Britain, went to shambles as Parliament ignored their proposals and their pleas for tranquility amongst the two. All of the pent up anger and frustration from the opposing sides led to the battle of Lexington and Concord, also know as the beginning of the American Revolution. Before this outbreak occurred, Parliament declared Massachusetts to be in a state of rebellion, and they had sent General Thomas Gage to suppress the rebels. On April 18th, Gage sent 700 troops into the town Concord to take all patriot supplies.…
- 1510 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Benjamin Franklin living in London in order to make compromise from Americans side. This seemed surprising because he was a traitor and it would cause a big trouble for Franklin in future. In 1768, when England had collision course with America, 1000 British troops were sent to create antagonism to which colonists did not react well (“Boston, Bloody Boston: The Revolution”). During this event, British troops had not acted violent first, in fact, surprisingly, it was colonists who had started the fight and had forced Britishers to use weapon against them which caused 5 civilians to die. This was known as the start of Boston Massacre which was viewed as British slaughtering civilians, by Patriots (“Boston, Bloody Boston: The Revolution”). This event was also surprising because I had learned that Britishers had attacked first and learning that civilians with firm conviction were able to attack first seemed astonishing. After England sent 3000 troops, it was expected of the British troops to attack first, yet the outcome was notably distinct as 73 Britishers had died, 174 wounded, and 26 missing while 49 Americans had died, 40 wounded, and 5 missing (“Boston, Bloody Boston: The Revolution”). This was notably different because British troops were very strong, armed, and trained, however Americans were equally strong as they defeated so many of British…
- 518 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
During the Boston Massacre, five Americans without guns were shot and killed by British soldiers (Doc 1). The redcoats were violent, and they murdered several defenseless colonists. Unlike Loyalists, Patriots felt a sense of loyalty to those who died because of the soldiers. “...these colonies now feel the disasters of fire, sword, and famine.” (Doc 3). Under British rule, families and children were suffering. “...against all violence we have endured, we have taken up arms.” When the British attacked the colonies repeatedly, the Patriots rose up to defend their…
- 691 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Many of the moderate delegates has attempted to appease Britain with the “Olive Branch Petition”, but it was never even considered by the king, and he felt insulted by it, so he tightened his grip on the colonies. On June 7, 1776, Richard Henry Lee proposed the colonies' split from Britain, in what is called “The Lee Resolution”. It outlined what he thought could happen for the colonies. The original text states: “Resolved, That these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States, that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved. That it is expedient forthwith to take the most effectual measures for forming foreign Alliances. That a plan of confederation be prepared and transmitted to the respective Colonies for their consideration and approbation.” (Courtesy of…
- 1996 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
Even after fighting in the American Revolutionary War began at Lexington and Concord in April 1775, most colonists still hoped for reconciliation with Great Britain. Thomas Jefferson saw a need to justify this revolution in the eyes of the people. He, and other founding fathers, knew that for this revolt to be successful, all thirteen colonies and their citizens must be united in a common goal. For Jefferson to achieve unity amongst the colonists, he had to show that violations of law and abuse of basic rights existed under the current British rule.…
- 1223 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Read the handouts below to learn about the effective ways of integrating quotations into your writing:…
- 466 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
There have been many different opinions about how the colonists developed a sense of their identity and unity as Americans by the eve of the Revolution. In the twenty five years leading up to the Revolution, the patriots got angered with Great Britain’s actions towards the colonies and wanted a solution. The patriots joined together and formed many attempted compromises with Great Britain. After the King and Parliament consistently rejected their proposals, the patriots realized that a revolution was their only option left. The economic and political situation between the two sides was very heated ever since the French and Indian War. These tensions were caused by the taxing acts proposed by Britain, and the protests following the acts by the colonists. A few of the key events were the Stamp Act, the Boston Massacre, and the Boston Tea Party.…
- 1063 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The American Revolution or the American Revolutionary War, some may call it, was started from a decade-long growing tension between Great Britain’s 13 North American colonies and the British government. The British government was trying to raise revenue by taxing the colonists using bills including: the Stamp Act, Townshend Tariffs, Tea Act, etc. Using the Stamp Act, the government tried to reduce some of their enormous debt. Stamp Act was passed and it required that every legal document be written on stamped paper showing proof of payment. In response the colonists organized the Stamp Act Congress to voice their disagreement to the bill. Another bill they passed was the Quartering Act, which in a nutshell required colonist to house British soldiers. The British government used this bill because of the increased defense cost in America and they felt that the colonist should help with the financial burden of housing and feeding the soldier since they helped them during the war. Plus they wanted to show who the boss was. In response to this, the colonists in New York argued that the bill was unfair and that they should be asked and not told what to do, so Parliament passed the New York Restraining Act, which stopped the passing of any laws until the assembly went over the law. The soldiers were forced to pitch tents in the middle of Boston Common, making the colonist not that excited either. The British government was now known for passing insane laws, but when the government passed the Coercive Acts the colonists had enough. The Coercive Acts were also known as the Intolerable Acts. They closed the…
- 1891 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
As the British were gathering up the Navy and Army men and going to send them over to the colonies to further undove them Mr. Henry states in his speech, “we have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the thrown, and have implored it’s interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and parliament.” This statement to his fellow Virginians was to remind them of how the King of Britain has total disregard for the colonies. Mr. Henry explains how these peaceful ways of disagreeing with the thrown was to meet with violence and total content. In light of these responses he simply states “If we wish to be free if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long continued if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained, we must fight!” As he is stating how Britain considers them weak and cowardly before a more powerful enemy. Mr. Henry says that we will not fight over battles alone. He also states that war is inevitable and to let it come because they shall not fight our battles alone. Mr. Henry boldly states to this convention, “There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations; and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. At the conclusion of this speech Patrick Henry ends this call to action with one of the most favorite quotes in history, “I know not what course other make take, but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”…
- 294 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
This is a co-complainant for complaint control # 19-CR-20170124131121. Co-complainant's contact information is: Pauline Bartlett, Counselor/Therapist - (951) 358-7854 Riverside County Department of Mental Health 3125 Myers Street, Riverside, CA 92503. This compliant was cross reported from CPS referral #0811-9054-1733-3030194 regarding resident youth Kiara Gonzalez DOB: 7/5/03 SW: Heidi Ferguson (951) 509-8027. The victim on this referral is Angela Darlynn Quiroz-Canal DOB: 6/10/01 DOP: UK SCHOOL: Antelope Valley High, 44900 N. Division St., Lancaster, CA 93535 SW: Kimberly Renee Brock (951) 509-8139.…
- 185 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The Boston Massacre is one of the most controversial events in American history that occurred in Boston before the American Revolution. Certainly, it has a fundamental role in the development of America as a nation, which led it to have a huge motivation for revolution. A heavy British military presence and having very high taxes in the country were some of the main reasons that made Boston citizens very irritated. Thus, there were already many disagreements and tensions between inhabitants and the British that could have led to the Massacre. In this essay, I will carefully analyze three primary sources, and compare these to the interpretation given by HBO’s John Adams. In my view, these sources can be divided into two groups in which the article of Boston Gazette and the picture of Paul Revere, “The Bloody Massacre” can stand together against the other two sources, the letter of Captain Thomas Preston and John Adams HBO miniseries. However, the most valuable and credible sources for me were the HBO miniseries John Adams (2008) and the letter of Captain Thomas Preston, which in my opinion, are very logical and describe the natural outcome of all the disagreements and tensions between Boston citizens and British soldiers.…
- 1801 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Even though delegates at the Second Continental Congress sent the Olive Branch Petition to George III requesting reconciliation, the recent skirmishes and hostile American public opinion made peaceful resolution unlikely, if not impossible. The delegates of the Continental Congress appeared aware of this inevitability themselves, for at the same time that they wrote their final petition to George III, they also made defensive provisions for a navy and an army, the latter to be commanded by George Washington. Moreover, even if the delegates truly believed that peaceful reconciliation was possible, it is doubtful the American public shared this belief. The Committees of Correspondence had by 1775 become powerful distributors of anti-British propaganda to both city dwellers and rural settlers alike.In addition, the organization and rallying that enabled the boycott on all British goods turned many colonists into patriotic Americans. This desire for independence was confirmed at the Battle of Lexington and Concord and the Battle of Bunker Hill, in which simple farmers refused to retreat from the powerful British army and instead stood their ground. Thus, even though Continental Congress delegates were still petitioning for peace as late as 1775, it is highly unlikely that peace was truly possible.American colonists rallied behind the popular cry “No taxation without representation” to protest the taxes and other legislation forced upon them by a Parliament that contained no American representatives. Colonial Americans valued their own representative legislatures and believed it unfair that they had to subject themselves to a legislative body thousands of miles away.…
- 738 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
For example, The American Revolution (1775-1783) which is also known as the United States War of Independence. Attempts by the British government to hike revenue by taxing the colonies met with heated protest among many colonists, who disliked their lack of image in Parliament and demanded the equal rights as other British citizens. The colonial opposition led to violence in 1770, when British soldiers opened fire on a crowd of colonists, killing five men in what is remembered as the Boston Massacre. While nonviolence set the building blocks upon which progress was to be built, violence is what allowed for the building of growth to happen. Ultimately, both of these approaches were necessary and made off of each other to achieve political, economic and or social…
- 626 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays