Preview

Does Aristotle’s System of Political Classification Have Any Relevance to the Modern Day World?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
623 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Does Aristotle’s System of Political Classification Have Any Relevance to the Modern Day World?
Does Aristotle’s system of political classification have any relevance to the modern day world? Illustrate your answer with reference to Aristotle’s model When we trace the liberal democratic system back to its origin, we can see how the modern day liberal democratic model has been tweaked and improved from the classical model in which was introduced by Aristotle. He observed over 150 Greek city states to examine how they ran their political and economic affairs, categorizing them to the questions ‘Who rules?’ and ‘who benefits?’ From his studies, Aristotle classified six forms of political constitution: DOTMAP DEMOCRACY, OLIGARCHY, TYRANNY, MONARCHY, ARISTOCRACY AND POLITY. Aristotle’s purpose was to evaluate these forms of government in order to find the ‘ideal’ constitution. In his view, DOT DEMOCRACY, OLIGARCHY AND TYRANNY were all bad forms of government as the rulers (whether individuals, groups and masses) generally ruled in their own interests and at the expense of others. In contrast, MAP MONARCHY, ARISTOCRACY AND POLITY were found to be the preferred as they governed in the interest of all. Aristotle’s idea of democracy varies to the modern day, as we now see democracy as a government by the people in the interest of all. However there are two main aspects of Aristotle’s classification of democracy in which are still relevant to the modern day liberal democratic system and these are EQUALITY AND FREEDOM. These principles are reflected on all citizens (the people) being equal before the law and having equal access to power. In a representative democracy, every vote has equal weight and no restrictions can be applied to any person wanting to become a representative. The modern day liberal democratic system allows the people to vote who they would like to represent them and make decisions on their behalf. This is classed as a representative democracy in which the political office is secured through an election process. Aristotle believed that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Several Greek city-states had the government form of an oligarchy, where the small group of people wield the ruling power. They were considered the highest class as political power was shared amongst the group (Carr). The groups were formed based off of aristocratic birth or wealth (Carr). Unlike this class, the lower class citizens in the oligarchy did not share the same rights as they lacked full political rights and were not eligible to rule (Carr). They are thus excluded from voting or having any type of say for any political decision for the city-state Furthermore, the right to vote or to be eligible for power was based off of wealth in this government form. In contrast to this government for his city-state lived under, Aristotle explores…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy is a type of government that is meant to give power to the people and give them control over their government and allow their voice to be heard. The democracy in Greece was incredibly direct, citizens could vote on each individual thing, however to be qualified as a citizen you had to be a male born of Athenian parents, all citizens could hold positions of power and their roles were chosen based on chance. As a citizen you were able to participate in votes and your voice was heard giving you a great impact on the government, however the requirements for citizenship caused people who were not citizens to have little say, for them the votes weren’t democratic. Unlike Greece, Rome had a representative democracy, the citizens of Rome, both plebeians and patricians could vote on who they wanted to represent them, however only patricians could hold positions of power. The Roman republic had three tiers, patricians could hold positions in all three, while it took many years for Plebeians to be able to hold all the positions of power. When we consider democracy to be based based on the say of the people, Rome was more democratic compared to Greece.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Did you know that world leaders do not exactly agree on what a democracy means. A democracy’s most salient and universally agreed upon component is a voting system. Athens was not truly democratic because they had slaves, no woman rights, and no equal rights.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the age of Pericles, the ideal form of government was believed to be a government formed by all of the citizens regardless of wealth or social standing. This was known as democracy, literally meaning " government of the people" [Document 3.] This government favored the many instead of the few. Athens was a direct democracy, meaning every citizen participated in debates. Western civilization used this philosophy of government by many, and created an indirect democracy where citizens elect officials to make and enforce laws.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are reasons why many of history’s greatest empires have tended to be either oligarchic or monarchial in nature. In observing the development of two of the ancient world’s most prominent models of representative government, the Athenian democracy and the Roman Republic, it can be concluded that when coupled with the political, economic, and social changes that come with expansion, the complications inherent with systems with democratic design prove incapable of running an empire.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    How Did Rome Become Good?

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In ancient Greece there was a situation where there were multiple city-states in a relatively small area that all had different political ideologies. These City States had highly regarded philosophers that wrote great lengths about them. This gives us a great foundation to try to understand the different systems and how they were based. The goal is to analyze some of the different ideologies and find why they were thought to be so good, and what made them good.…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle truly believed that politics was a science that could be understood in the same way as anatomy or physics. Because of that he wrote this book to help people create a better more stable state. He starts by explaining the way in which a household is like a small state and clarifying the rules that must be put into place in regards to women, children and slaves all of which he seen as less than people with purpose. After dealing with this he begins his description of the different types of states, which he divides into six main primary forms. The first three that he would describe as proper states are monarchy, aristocracy and constitutional government. After that he describes the three corrupted forms as tyranny, oligarchy, and democracy. Monarchy is when one person who is the best in the state rules under the law for the sake of his citizens. This government though is often corrupted into tyranny where one person through strength holds his equals or betters below himself for his own benefit. Aristocracy is when the people who are above average join together to wisely run the state so that it might prosper. Often though it degrades into oligarchy where the power is all in the hands of a few who use the power to try maintain their position. Constitutional government is when people willingly submit to wise laws, which are put together to help the state. Democracy is its corrupted form…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Empire and Pp

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages

    12. Define “democracy” (as it existed in Ancient Greece”) and “oligarchy” (Chapter 4, pp. 107).…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Greece is normally associated with the origin of democracy. Basically, Greek government evolved from single rule to small group rule to rule by the people. Because each city-state in ancient Greece possessed its own government, some of these types existed other than democracy, namely monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy. This essay will compare and contrast the ancient governments, namely monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy and democracy in Ancient Greek city states.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle bases his idea of just and unjust law on society’s understanding of why the law exists. Ideal democracy, as we discussed in class, consists of citizens in a society being almost completely informed, educated, and involved in politics and the lawmaking process. As also stated, Democracy can pose a problem to leaders, since the public is knowledgeable. The ignorant are easier to manipulate and hide unjust law from, like in Martin Luther King, Jr’s current segregated society.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    7A. According to Aristotle’s democracy, anyone can vote as long as they are citizens. Being a citizen means someone who is actively involved in politics. These citizens must participate in the government or household but they cannot do any other work besides that. They must also have some wealth and there should be a hierarchy because they are more educated and would know what to do in politics. Poor people should not be allowed citizenship to vote because they would be too busy working to devote enough time to education and self-improve themselves. They would not understand or know what to do in politics.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Humanism In Greek Art

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Greeks displayed their humanistic values through government by they utilizing an effective system of self governing. This system was a direct democracy, which is defined as “government by the people” or “rule of the majority.” In the Athenian Democracy, the Assembly was…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Ancient Grecian culture there were various political systems in use depending on the city or Poleis. Today we shall take a look at the following systems monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy, and democracy, there were some others but these will be our focus. Interestingly enough while we think of ancient Athens as being a democracy it wasn't always so, it eventually evolved into a democratic nation, but between the 8th to 6th century, Athens was ruled by aristocracy and according to The Athenian Aristocracy (n.d), the constitution read as follows “Appointment to the supreme offices of state went by birth and wealth; and they were held at first for life, and after wards for a term of ten years. (Athenian Constitution 3.1)” Aristocratic families ruled and most of the Athenian citizens had no say in the rules that governed their everyday life.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Democracy is arguably the most integral aspect of a functioning nation. Overtime, it has superseded the concept of power through divine right, thus allowing the general public to have a say regarding the laws of society. Throughout history, western democracy has evolved significantly from the time of the Greeks, to modern practice. Though it is still a relatively new concept, democracy has been strengthened by society's desire to push for their individual rights. By use of revolution, government reform and enlightenment philosophy, democracy was able to evolve into an inclusive form of government that gave equal choice to the greatest amount of people. Democracy is unique in the sense that unlike other forms of government, it requires the cooperative effort of both the…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two most common types of regimes are democracy and oligarchy. All regimes desire to be wealthy, therefore all regimes are oligarchical to some extent, but more specifically oligarchies are regimes where the wealthy rule. Democracies on the other hand are defined as the rule of the majority, which is assuming that the majority ruling are the poor. One main point that Aristotle usually refers back to about the possible arrangements for regimes is that the rule of law is fundamental to all regimes. Without the rule of law, there is no regime, as Aristotle states: "for where the laws do not rule there is no regime." He also mentions that "the law should rule in all matters, while the offices and the regime should judge in particular cases." Aristotle does recognize that law has limitations, that being it cannot specify how it should be applied to each…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics