Does Queen Mary (Tudor) really deserve the title 'Bloody Mary?'?

'Bloody Mary' was harsh indeed, and many people died under her rein, but I find it odd that only she gets the title of 'bloody' even though so many other rulers killed just as much and more as she did. She had people killed, yes, but her reasons were just that shade purer than, say, her father, who killed women because they could not produce a son and men because they displeased him. She was trying to restore order in an overturned country in the only way she saw fit: with religion. She was attempting to bring people back to God and undo the damage she believed her father had wreaked with the same methods.
In many ways Mary deserves the title “Bloody” for her torture and execution of Protestants. However, compared to 
other Tudor Kings and Queens, Mary killed far fewer of her rebellions than Elizabeth. So was she actually less “Bloody” than other Tudor 
leaders and therefore not deserving to be remembered by this 
title. 
Mary had had a hard life before even taking the throne and as a 
child had seen her parent’s marriage fall apart and also named a bastard. She had been separated from her mother, Catherine of Aragon, and 
kept away from the Royal Court by the jealous actions of the 
Queen Anne Boleyn. Mary had also seen her mother’s religion 
and the religion of the whole country changed by her father, Henry the 8th and 
his advisers. All these situations shaped Mary’s character
into one that was disbelieving, cautious and revengeful. 
Mary certainly grew colder and stricter as she grew older 
and she clearly dealt harshly with rebellions that questioned her 
rule and her desire to change England to once again being 
aligned with the Roman Catholic Church. This was evidenced in 
the way that many of the rebels who took part in the Wyatt 
rebellion were executed cruelly. 
 Mary’s marriage to Philip of Spain, a man whom she clearly 
loved but who did not love her in return also shaped Mary’s 
rule. Philip’s many affairs drove Mary, in her loneliness, to 
become even more extreme in her religious feeling. Philip’s decision to marry Mary was clearly led by his own 
desire to control England and his own determination to see 
England entirely Catholic. Her inability 
to have a child also made Mary more desperate, because without a 
child she could not ensure the future of England as a Catholic 
country, and if she died without a heir o the throne it would be given to her sister Elizabeth who supported the opposite religion, Protestant, and all Mary’s hard work and decisions would go to waste.