Does Smith Have A Moral Obligation To Save The Boy

Does Smith have a moral obligation to save the boy?
I believe that Smith was being very insensitive and yes, it would be smith’s moral obligation to rescue the boy who has fallen in the water and cannot swim. A civil person should make it their duty to help out others they can. I think by smith choosing not to help someone from drowning and dying this may hunt him for a life time, I know I would feel very guilty if I new how to swim well and didn’t use that ability to help save someone’s life.

Does Smith have an ethical obligation to save the boy?
It is also Smith ethical obligation to save this boy, and I believe this to be true because it would be the right thing to do. If there is a way to save a life and we have the power to do so then