Preview

Does Socialization Matter?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
31040 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Does Socialization Matter?
Psychological
Review

Select Article
July 1995 Vol. 102, No. 3, 458-489
© 1995 by the American Psychological Association
For personal use only—not for distribution
________________________________________
Where Is the Child 's Environment? A Group Socialization Theory of Development
Judith Rich Harris
Middletown, New Jersey
________________________________________
Abstract
Do parents have any important long-term effects on the development of their child 's personality? This article examines the evidence and concludes that the answer is no. A new theory of development is proposed: that socialization is context-specific and that outside-the-home socialization takes place in the peer groups of childhood and adolescence. Intra- and intergroup processes, not dyadic relationships, are responsible for the transmission of culture and for environmental modification of children 's personality characteristics. The universality of children 's groups explains why development is not derailed by the wide variations in parental behavior found within and between societies.
________________________________________
________________________________________
In 1983, after many dozens of pages spent reviewing the literature on the effects parents have on children, Eleanor Maccoby and John Martin paused for a critical overview of the field of socialization research. They questioned the size and robustness of the effects they had just summarized; they wondered whether the number of significant correlations was greater than that expected by chance. They cited other research indicating that biological or adoptive siblings do not develop similar personalities as a result of being reared in the same household. This was their conclusion:
These findings imply strongly that there is very little impact of the physical environment that parents provide for children and very little impact of parental characteristics that must be essentially the same for all children in a family



References: Abramovitch, R., Corter, C., Pepler, D. J. & Stanhope, L. (1986). Sibling and peer interaction: A final follow-up and a comparison. Child Development, 57, 217-229. Adler, P Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E. & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Alper, J Alwin, D. F. (1988). From obedience to autonomy: Changes in traits desired in children, 1924-1978. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 33-52. Anderson, K Archer, J. (1992). Childhood gender roles: Social context and organization. In H. McGurk (Ed.), Childhood social development: Contemporary perspectives (pp. 31-61). Hove, England: Erlbaum. Asch, S Asendorpf, J. B. & van Aken, M. A. G. (1994). Traits and relationship status: Stranger versus peer group inhibition and test intelligence versus peer group competence as early predictors of later self-esteem. Child Development, 65, 1786-1798. Banaji, M Baron, N. S. (1992). Growing up with language: How children learn to talk. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Bartlett, J Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology Monograph, 4 (1, Part 2). Baumrind, D Bebko, J. M. & McKinnon, E. E. (1990). The language experience of deaf children: Its relation to spontaneous rehearsal in a memory task. Child Development, 61, 1744-1752. Bedford, V Bee, D. E., Baranowski, T., Rassin, D. K., Richardson, J. & Mikrut, W. (1991). Breast-feeding initiation in a triethnic population. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 145, 306-309. Bell, R Bell, R. Q. & Chapman, M. (1986). Child effects in studies using experimental or brief longitudinal approaches to socialization. Developmental Psychology, 22, 595-603. Belsky, J., Rovine, M Berndt, T. J. (1979). Developmental changes in conformity to peers and parents. Developmental Psychology, 15, 606-616. Bickerton, D Bierman, K. L., Smoot, D. L. & Aumiller, K. (1993). Characteristics of aggressive-rejected, aggressive (nonrejected), and rejected (non-aggressive) boys. Child Development, 64, 139-151. Billig, M Birch, L. L. (1987). Children 's food preferences: Developmental patterns and environmental influences. Annals of Child Development, 4, 171-208. Block, J Bouchard, T. J. Jr. (1994, June 17). Genes, environment, and personality. Science, 264, 1700-1701. Bouchard, T Bowerman, C. E. & Kinch, J. W. (1969). Changes in family and peer orientation of children between the fourth and tenth grades. In M. Gold & E. Douvan (Eds.), Adolescent development (pp. 137-141). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Bowlby, J Brewer, M. B. & Weber, J. G. (1994). Self-evaluation effects of interpersonal versus intergroup social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 268-275. Brody, G Brody, G. H., Stoneman, Z., MacKinnon, C. E. & MacKinnon, R. (1985). Role relationships and behavior between preschool-aged and school-aged sibling pairs. Developmental Psychology, 21, 124-129. Bronfenbrenner, U Brooks, J. & Lewis, M. (1976). Infants ' responses to strangers: Midget, adult, and child. Child Development, 47, 323-332. Brown, B Brown, B. B., Mounts, N., Lamborn, S. D. & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting practices and peer group affiliation in adolescence. Child Development, 64, 467-482. Bukowski, W Burns, G. L. & Farina, A. (1992). The role of physical attractiveness in adjustment. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 118, 157-194. Buss, D Carson, R. C. (1989). Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 227-248. Ceci, S Chao, R. K. (1994). Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development, 65, 1111-1119. Cherlin, A Clausen, J. A. (1975). The social meaning of differential physical and sexual maturation. In S. E. Dragastin & G. H. Elder, Jr. (Eds.), Adolescence in the life cycle: Psychological change and the social context (pp. 25-47). New York: Halsted. Coie, J Cole, M. (1992). Culture in development. In M. H. Bornstein & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Developmental psychology: An advanced textbook (pp. 731-789). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Corsaro, W Corsaro, W. A. (1994). Discussion, debate, and friendship processes: Peer discourse in U.S. and Italian nursery schools. Sociology of Education, 67, 1-26. Corsaro, W Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163-228). New York: Oxford University Press. Council, J Curtiss, S. R. (1977). Genie: A linguistic study of a modern day "wild child." New York: Academic Press. Daniels, D David, H. P. (1992). Born unwanted: Long-term developmental effects of denied abortion. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 163-181. Davidson, R de Waal, F. (1989). Peacemaking among primates. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Diamond, K., LeFurgy, W DiLalla, L. F. & Gottesman, I. I. (1991). Biological and genetic contributors to violence-Widom 's untold tale. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 125-129. Dornbusch, S Draper, P. & Cashdan, E. (1988). Technological change and child behavior among the !Kung. Ethnology, 27, 339-365. Dunn, J Dunn, J., Plomin, R. & Daniels, D. (1986). Consistency and change in mothers ' behavior to two-year-old siblings. Child Development, 57, 348-356. Eckerman, C Eckert, P. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York: Teachers College Press. Edwards, C Eimas, P. D. & Quinn, P. C. (1994). Studies on the formation of perceptually based basic-level categories in young infants. Child Development, 65, 903-907. Erikson, E Ernst, C. & Angst, J. (1983). Birth order: Its influence on personality. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. Fagen, R Fagot, B. I. (1985). Beyond the reinforcement principle: Another step toward understanding sex role development. Developmental Psychology, 21, 1097-1104. Fagot, B Falbo, T. & Polit, D. F. (1986). Quantitative research of the only child literature: Research evidence and theory development. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 176-189. Falbo, T Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140. Fine, G Fine, G. A. (1988). Good children and dirty play. Play & Culture, 1, 43-56. Fiske, S Fiske, S. T. & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw Hill. Fox, N Fox, N. A., Kimmerly, N. L. & Schafer, W. D. (1991). Attachment to mother/attachment to father: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 62, 210-225. Fraiberg, S Freud, A. & Dann, S. (1951). An experiment in group upbringing. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 6, 127-168. Frick, P Garner, R. (1990). When children and adults do not use learning strategies: Toward a theory of settings. Review of Educational Research, 60, 517-529. Genesee, F Ghodsian-Carpey, J. & Baker, L. A. (1987). Genetic and environmental influences on aggression in 4- to 7-year-old twins. Aggressive Behavior, 13, 173-186. Glenn, N Glynn, A. (1970). The British: Portrait of a people. New York: Putnam 's Sons. Goldsmith, H Goldsmith, H. H. (1993b). Temperament: Variability in developing emotion systems. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 353-364). New York: Guilford Press.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    References: Baumrind, D. (1967). Child-care practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 75, 43-88.…

    • 2397 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    For many years, parents seemed to bear the full weight of responsibility for how their children turned out. If children turned out respectable, their parents received much credit; if children turned out negative, their parents bore the blame. This perspective seemed to leave little room for other influences for how children turn out; influences such as biological factors and personality type, cultural and peer influences, and the child’s own choices. Judith Rich, however, in her Group Socialization Theory of Development, proposes that influences outside the home, with peer-groups, carry greater importance in development than parental influence.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Children psychosocial development can be impacted by external factors such as family and many personalities in society.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Toddler Child Observation

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Siblings often serve as the first extended social interaction with other children (Venatsanou & Kambas, 2010). Children with siblings are found to have more opportunities for social interactions as well as more mature play partners, while only children may be less prepared to manage conflicts with their peers (Newman & Newman, 2015). Alfred Adler even took it one step further and theorized that birth order of siblings greatly influences how they see the world. The position one occupies in a family can impact how one interacts with others (Corey, 2013). Clearly, siblings can have a profound influence on the development of a…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nurture versus nature is a well-known controversial debate that will never be resolved. Family relationships constitute the most significant component in the development of a child. There are four components of family functioning that influence the mental growth of children. One factor is affection and nurturance. Children with parents who are affectionate and nurturing are likely to be attached to their parents compared to parents that are less affectionate in nurturing towards their children. Clarity and consistency of rules is the second aspect. Parents that have set rules that are constantly set have kids who are less likely to be noncompliant and disobedient. The third aspect is the level of expectancy that the parent has set for their child. Studies show that parents who have high expectancy towards their children have a high self-confidence, there more appreciative and they are more caring towards others. Effective open communication between the parent and the child would be the final aspect. Children who have open communication towards their parents research states that they are economically and emotionally stable. The aspects mentioned above explain various categories and together they form parenting styles.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parents and family play a big part in children’s development and there are many elements linked to a child’s background that can affect their development.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    methods in which parents raise their children impact their development as well as their behavior.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Parenting Syles

    • 2262 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Maccoby, E.E. (1992). The role of parents in the socialization fo children: an historical overview. Developmental Psychology. (Vol. 28, pp. 1006-1017)…

    • 2262 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Better living conditions and the right kind of care helps children to be a better human being. Psychologists today believe that nature and nurture both play an important role in influencing early human development. It is important to interact between nature and nurture to guide development. While genes control many aspects of an individual’s personality, there is no denying that environmental events influences early human development. The growth of emotional, psychological and social stability is influenced equally by both environments as well as hereditary. Also, social referencing in a child is developed from their parents. The cultural environment, self esteem and economic standing of those surrounding the child will set the way a child will react to in a situation. Proper nurturing and nature is important for a child to develop the right kind of attitude and behaviour. New born infants are born with innate abilities such as hearing, taste and smell to learn but they adapt their learning through experience and the kind of atmosphere they are surrounded…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Lytton, H. and Romney, D.M. (1991). ‘Parents differential socialization of boys and girls: A meta-analysis’. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 267-296.…

    • 1844 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Maccoby, E.E. (1992). The role of parents in the socialization of children: An historical overview. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1006-1017.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Birth Order Aggression

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The purpose of this research is to determine if birth order correlates to a demonstration of aggressiveness in kindergarten aged children. It is hypothesized that middle born children will demonstrate the most aggressive tendencies, last born children would experience less than the first born, and only children would have the least when compared to all other birth orders. This quasi-experimental methodology will involve a field study of children from the ten kindergarten classes at the Seoul American Elementary School (SAES). Teachers will be asked to complete the Child Behavior Scale (CBS) inventory on each child, used to measure six behavior categories related to aggression. Each CBS inventory…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The parental impact on a child is one that cannot always be measured. As children grow they learn at a rapid pace by using all their senses to acquire knowledge. Humans in general, especially children, are a group that is drawn to affection and attention. When children are not exposed to positive and consistent parental interaction it can have lasting and negative effects. This evidence has been supported through a study conducted in China by the Radiological Society of North America. "Previous studies support the hypothesis that parental care can directly affect brain development in offspring. However, most prior work is with rather severe social deprivation, such as orphans. We looked at children who were left behind with relatives when the…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Parenting Style

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Baumrind, D. (1967). Child-care practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 75, 43-88.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Impact Of Birth Order

    • 4109 Words
    • 17 Pages

    The purpose of this section will be to summarize past research about birth order and personality and define what is meant by the actual term personality. In 1936, Stagner and Katzoff, of Akron University, had this to say about personality as it relates to birth order: “Psychological literature is full of statements as to the effect of being an only child, an oldest child, a youngest child, ect., upon the personality. Unfortunately, the evidence upon which these statements are based is conspicuous mainly by its absence. The fallacies of personal impressions, selected cases and unwarranted interpretations are nowhere in psychology” (Stagner & Katzoff, 1936). This conclusion was accepted by psychologists for about 50 years before opposing findings encouraged more research. Personality was viewed as fluid behavior that adapted to an environment or age. Differences in personality were believed to be because of differences in social class or physical size (Jefferson, Herbst, & McCrae, 1998). While some researchers admitted to seeing little or weak evidence relating to birth order and personality development, no real evidence was published. Contrary to these beliefs, profound psychologist such as Alfred Adler, Sigmund Freud, and Carl Jung continued to research psychosocial development and sibling relations. Their work continues to be a foundation…

    • 4109 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays