Does The Actor Really Have A Good Reason Like Hamlet

self the actor that he is comparing himself to has been acting for a while so it's obvious that he is more convincing than Hamlet. The actor that told the story of King Priam had tons of practice faking his feelings that even his body plays along with the part he is acting. For example, Hamlet is arguing with himself and saying that if the actor had a real motive he could do wonders "drown the stage with tears"make mad the guilty and appal the free, confound the ignorant, and amaze indeed" (2.2.) this quote basically says that if the actor really did have a good reason like Hamlet did he would make everyone believe what Hamlet is going through. All of this shows that Hamlet is overly emotional because Hamlet is getting desperate he is doing all
Hamlet refers to himself as "dull and muddy-mettled rascal" (2.2.) this means that he is calling himself a dull good for nothing person. He refers to himself as this because he keeps on acting like he is crazy but his plan is not working since Claudius still didn't confess to killing old Hamlet. Hamlet also refers to himself as a Jhon-a-dream which is a dreamer. He does this because all he is doing is talking about his revenge on Claudius he is not taking any action. By Hamlet thinking about himself like this, it shows that he is showing overly emotional behavior because he is just focusing on his flaws and by doing this he is going to think less and less about himself. Hamlet keeps on saying that he is worthless and he doesn't do anything wrong, even if he did that doesn't mean he is dull and worthless. Furthermore, Hamlet is just itching to do the next plan of his plan he is just waiting until the time he hears a confession from Claudius. For example, Hamlet is saying that he has heard stories from people " guilty creatures sitting at a play Have, by the very cunning of the scene, been struck so to the soul that presently they have proclaimed their