Preview

Does the Void Exist

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
847 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Does the Void Exist
Does the void exist?

One of the main controversies in Pre-socratic philosophy is the dispute of the existence or non-existence of the void. Two groups of philosophers argue this idea. The first group, namely Parmenides, argues that the void does not exist. This is the opinion of the Monist philosophers. The other group is the atomists who argue this thesis and believe there is a void. This group is primarily represented by the philosophers, Democritus and Leucippus.

Parmenides argues against the existence of the void. The plenum fragment states his opinion quite clearly:

"Nor is it divisible, since it is all alike; nor is there more here and less there, which would prevent it from holding together, but it is full of what is. So it is all continuous, for what is clings close to what is."

This shows the idea, that if there would be a void or an empty space then "what is" would move into it. Hence, there is no void. Because "what is" fills up this space completely. "Since it is all alike" volume or density is continuous everywhere. Since it is not divisible there is no void between "what is". Also "what is" itself has no void in it. If there were void or space in one object, compared to a more denser object these particles would not "hold together". These densities are balanced out. Therefore, density in "what is" is continuous. Furthermore "what is"

does not move from one place to the other. Since "what is" clings together, there is no empty space an object could move to. Therefore, movement is impossible. "Moreover it is immovable, held so in mighty bonds. And it is without beginning and end, because both creation and destruction have been driven away by true belief. Remaining always the same and in the same place by itself, it stays fixed where it is" (Fragment 7 C, page 98). Here Parmenides includes his idea of a plenum, where "what is" remains the same and is either created nor destroyed. This further proves the point that since there is no

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    BIO Quiz 2

    • 572 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The component of an atom or molecule that is most important in determining its chemical properties is the…

    • 572 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chem lab

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is more solid than all others. There is only 1 liquid and only a few gases.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They may differ in their principles and fundamentals but in the end some will agree that only nature is the only form of existence. One philosopher in particular, Democritus, stands out for his belief of the existence of substances. Democritus holds the principle true that the only thing that exists is atom and void. This is seen in the statement made by Democritus, “being exists no more than non-being, because the void exists [no less] than body” (Democritus 25). Democritus principles align with that of Lewis’s opposition to the argument of their being more than nature due to the principles that he puts forth. Democritus explains the varying characteristics to the atoms, such as, indivisible, infinite. Indivisible, but he makes no clear distinction between their being any other kind of existence of nature. Secondly, a major reason that Democritus argument fails to agree with Lewis yet enhances the opposing argument comes from the idea of the collision of particles. To show this he states it as such, “the number of shapes [of atoms] is infinite, since there is no reason why they should be one shape rather than another” (25). This is similar to the argument that Lewis is fight this same argument, he sums it up by saying, “they must, like everything else, be the unintended and meaningless outcome of blind forces” (Lewis 77). Democritus and this group of…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 9 worksheet

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Democritus agreed that everything which is must be internal, but denied that “the void” can be equated with nothing. This makes him the first thinker on record to bicker for the existence of something that people thought didn’t exist. To explain the change around us from basic, unchangeable substance he argued that there are different elements which have existed since the beginning of time but it can be rearranged into different forms. He bickered yet again, this time about how atoms only had several properties particularly size, shape, and mass. All other properties that we attribute to matter, such as color and taste, are but the results of complex contact…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Calpurnia Quotes

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “As more individuals are produced than can possibly survive, there must in every case be a struggle for existence, either one individual with another of the same specie, or with the individuals of distinct species, or with the physical conditions of life.”…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    philosophers who’s beliefs that the void in our knowledge needed to be addressed so that…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Meditator is alone, no trees, no people, no oceans, no mountains, no earth, no moon; just him and his isolation. In “Meditation Three”, Descartes goes much deeper than just his famous philosophical ideal — if “one can think one can be”(Descartes 19). He goes on to explain how there must be a God. He states that if there was not a God, people would have created themselves. If this were to be true, everyone would create themselves as perfect people. Descartes believes that there must be a God. God created humans and other humans and other objects to allow humans to think. This human ability to think allows them to exist. If nothing else were to exist and the Meditator was alone in the universe then he could not think and without thought,…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that for their time, all held compelling ideas as to how things are in existence; the pre-Socratic philosophers that “stuck out” most to me were The Atomist. By far, The Atomist was the closets philosophers to what we the human race holds as true.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nutrient Cycle: Questions

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages

    That matter can neither be created nor destroyed and that nature is essentially a closed system.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mind and Body Paper

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages

    or not has been the subject of much discussion and debate between philosophers since antiquity.…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories about life after death all concern whether or not there is a part of the human body which survives the death, specifically the soul, and if it does where or when it goes post death. Embodied existence is the idea that we can in a physical sense, survive death and live on as physical matter, rather than an aspect of us, such as our soul living a spiritual, disembodied existence after death. Dualism is the theory that our body is distinctly separate from our soul, that as humans we consist of two separate entities. Plato, a famous dualist believed that the soul is eternal, and that our embodied life as a human is just a small part of existence. Descartes also expressed the idea of dualism when he famously said “I think therefore I am”, suggesting that because we can think independently of our bodies, our mind is a separate entity all together. Alternatively monists argue that we are a single entity, where our soul and our body are intrinsically linked, as one and cannot be separated. Both philosophical and scientific thinking have contributed to the seemingly never ending debate on whether or not it’s possible to survive death.…

    • 2365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life after death

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Firstly, Plato believed in disembodied existence after death as he claimed that the soul and body were separate and that the soul was in the realm of the Forms and then was incarnated in the body. He also said that in the future, the soul will be freed from the body and will be reincarnated into another body or eventually return to the realm of the forms. Furthermore, Lewis, Descartes and Swinburne are also dualists and they argued that we exist beyond death as well. H.D. Lewis argued that we detect mental processes quite distinct from physical ones, suggesting a non-physical self and Richard Swinburne argued that people could conceivably not be limited to using a chunk of matter for perception, knowledge and control. Moreover, Descartes argued that the body is divisible (eg parts can be severed), but the mind is not and hence argued that we conceive ourselves as separate from the body.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes famously proposed the conception of the mind and body as two distinct substances. Substance dualism is one of his famously philosophical stances. According to this philosophical position, the mind and body can exist as two separate substances that can exist independently. Descartes commences by noting that the basis of his opinions have been his senses and we cannot be sure that our minds are not deceiving us. It is as such because we cannot be sure that our exciting thoughts of the world are not dreams. Descartes, therefore, argues that there is seemingly some sense in which people can be uncertain about the existence of items that they believe exist.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper will address how René Descartes, the “Father of Modern Philosophy”, explains the nature of falsity in an attempt to prove his claim that “everything that we clearly and distinctly perceive is true” (Descartes 11). This paper sets out to prove that within his “Fourth Meditation” Descartes examines and diagnoses the source of error and falsity; it will also examine his successfulness of said purpose. The word “intellect” refers to the faculty of knowledge, which is within Descartes as well as all humans; “will” refers to the faculty of freedom of choice (page 38-39). Also, the word “privation” means the “lack of some knowledge…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout time both philosophers’ theories have ignited arguments when it comes to the conception of “substance.” Although both were around about the same time period, one heavily juxtaposed the other and criticized severely. At the end of the day both philosophers had an entire and total different idea of what substance was.…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays