Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Doing the Right Thing: Is it so easy?

Good Essays
1646 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Doing the Right Thing: Is it so easy?
Doing the Right Thing: Is it so easy?

Many people would like to think that, if put in a certain situation, they would always do the right thing no matter the circumstances. However, social experiments such as the Good Samaritan Experiment (Darley and Batson,1973), the Milgram Shock Experiment (1963), and the Stanford Prison Experiment (Zimbardo,1973) give psychologists results that say otherwise. The majority of the unknowing participants in these three experiments showed a surprising lack of compassion for a fellow human who (as far as the participant knew) was in pain or in a position of helplessness in which they needed the participants’ mercy or aid. The subject not only ignored the needs of the individuals, but in the Stanford Prison Experiment and the Milgram Shock Experiment, the participants administered physical and psychological pain upon an individuals who were innocent. Due to these finding it can be stated that moral conscience is in fact present in everyone, but one can easily not act upon it or even contradict it if put in a certain situation. In the Good Samaritan Experiment, the subjects were students of a religious boarding school. They were recruited to a classroom to fill out a personality survey. Then after taking the survey, they would be told to go to another room for the second part of the study. The subjects were divided into three groups. One groups would be told that they were running late for the second part. The second group would be told that they were on time and the third group would be told they were ahead of schedule. On their way there, the subject would see a man slumped in a doorway who would ask for help. This is a part of the experiment the subject is unaware of. This man is an actor. Now one would expect that all students would stop to help the man and reflect the virtues and beliefs of their religion. However, the Golden Rule to do unto others as they would do unto you was easily disregarded if the student was told they were late. Only 10% of the students who were in a hurry stopped to help the man. Of the students who were told they were on time, 45% of them helped. Sixty-three percent of students who were told they were ahead of schedule stopped to help. These numbers are highly disturbing. What does it say about human nature if one can ignore another individual’s need just to make it on time? Did the subjects who passed the man not have any compassion for the man? Apparently they did. Darley and Batson recorded that many of the subjects that passed the man arrived at the second room distraught or anxious. As if they knew very well they should’ve helped the man but their concern to make it on time for their own self-interest was more important to them. If being late is enough for someone to disregard an individual’s need for help, what if the individual thought he or she was part of an important psychological study? Would that be enough for one to disregard their moral conscience as well? This is answered in the Milgram Shock Experiment. In this experiment, the subject believes he is taking part in an experiment that studies the effects punishment has on learning, as far as he or she knows, there is another subject who plays the role of “learner”. Although he is actually an actor just like the slumped man in the doorway of the Good Samaritan Experiment. The learner would be asked to seat and strap themselves into a chair that doesn’t look too different from an electric chair. The subject is told he will play the role of “teacher”. The teacher’s job is to administer an electric shock through the chair by flipping a switch every time the learner gets a question wrong. The questions are memory based, so prior knowledge isn’t required to get the questions right. The teacher is given a sample shock so he or she knows the shocks aren’t too bad. After every wrong answer, the shocks get stronger. The teacher is told that none of the shocks are fatal or dangerous. However, prior to the experiment, the subject meets the man he or she thinks is also a participant in the elevator on their way to the room the experiment. Through casual conversation, the actor informs the individual that he has heart condition. Now most would assume that this information is pretty important if one would be going to be receiving electrical shocks, yet none of the subjects inform the experimenter of the learner’s heart condition. Even worse, after the point where the shocks are so strong the learner begins to yelp in pain and complain of his heart condition, the teacher, instead of using his or her own judgement, would look to the experimenter for guidance. The experimenter, who wants to see how far one would go to please authority, explains the importance of the experiment and strongly urges the teacher to continue with the experiment. Of the 40 subjects, 25 listened and continued to administer stronger shocks after every wrong answer to the highest voltage on the machine. Now it should be noted that the teacher was obviously distressed as he was administering each shock. Yet, the majority of the subjects kept it up instead of voicing their doubts and refusing to continue for the sake of their moral conscience. These are frightening results, any ethical person would like to think they would stand up to the experimenter and refuse to continue, however these weren’t unethical people. They were average people, not psychopaths or people who lacked compassion. Put in this situation, their ethics became second to their desire to please the experimenter. After the experiment was over, the subjects who continued to the end would show signs of great relief after discovering the learner was all right. Yet, if they cared so much, why didn’t they stop? What does this say about human compassion if one is able to not act upon it just to please someone in an authoritative role? So far, the reader has seen how one can easily walk right by a fellow human in need in the Good Samaritan Experiment and how one can ever administer painful electrical shocks to an innocent individual in the Milgram Shock Experiment. What if one was chosen to be a guard for a mock prison and it was their job to be a little unfair and unethical to play the part. Many would say that they would never take the role too seriously, but the results of the infamous Stanford Prison Experiment contradict this idea. Of the three experiments, the Stanford Prison Experiment is the most unnerving of them all. 21 college age men were chosen for this experiment. There were two groups, “guards” and “prisoners”. The plan was that for two weeks the prisoners would be held in a mock prison held in a hallway at Stanford University. For the experiment to work it was the participants job to play their part effectively and not break character. However, within six days it had to be stopped due to things getting out of control. The guards and prisoner began to act as if they were in a real prison. On just the second day prisoners started to rebel, as if they truly were in a prison and there was no escape. Guards used sadistic tactics to keep prisoners in line and a couple prisoners even had breakdowns due to this mistreatment. An otherwise ordinary and ethical man turned into a harsh and cruel prison guard, and for what justification? It was a merely a psychological experiment, yet the participants, (particularly the guards) took it so far. Looking at these three experiments, it is evident that it is too easy for an individual to ignore their internal ethical code. As a society one must ask why is it that we can act against our moral conscience even though it is clear that it is there. What was the boarding school student thinking as he passed the man slumped in the doorway? Could he have really been thinking that being on time was more important? What was the teacher in the Milgram Shock Experiment thinking as he or she kept flipping the switch? Was he or she really thinking that it was ethical to put someone through so much pain for the sake of a psychology experiment? Most frightening of all, what about the guards in the Stanford Prison Experiment? Did they think it was right to play the role of sadistic prison guard so well? Did they justify their behavior to themselves as they mistreated the prisoners? These are questions that psychologists look at quite recent examples of human history such as the genocides in Darfur or the horrible killing commited by the militias of the Central African Republic. The Good Samaritan Experiment was inspired by the tragic story of Kitty Genovese. The Milgram Shock Experiment and the Stanford Prison Experiment were inspired by the horrors of the holocausts. Psychologists thought these experiments could explain these unacceptable human acts, however we are left with more questions than answers. Since the day we’re born, we’re raised to do good and treat others as we would like to be treated, but as we are put in certain situations it seems that we can disregard what we were taught. This is worrisome. If we can disregard our moral conscience, who knows what we’re capable of when put in the right situation. In order for humanity to progress as a whole, we must ask ourselves what it will take to integrate an internal code of ethics that cannot be ignored or disregarded. If we do that, it would be a big step for humanity.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Replicating Milgram (The Open University, 2014), Milgram explains how he set up his obedience experiment. His aim was to get a volunteer, a ‘teacher’ to inflict increasing amounts of pain, through electric shocks, to another volunteer a ‘learner’ and to see when the ‘teacher’ would turn to the researcher, the ‘authority figure’ and ask to stop. Unknown to ‘the teacher’, the ‘learner’ and the ‘authority figure’ were aware of the real purpose of the experiment; the ‘teacher’ was told it was to study the effect of punishment on learning, and genuinely thought that they were inflicting pain on the ‘learner’ sat in another room. It was this deception and the emotional stress it generated to the ‘teacher’ that prompted the ethical issues debate…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    draft5 1

    • 1345 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many people argue that human are naturally cruel while some say no one is born with cruelty in them. After reading “The Perils of Obedience”, The Kitty Genovese Case”, and Darley and Latane’s experiments, I realized that humans acts based upon the situation and people around them in a case of emergency. Humans sometimes get confused on whether they should care about the crises or others will take care of it.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the experiment, the subject is told by the experimenter to give shocks from a scale of low to dangerously high to the person in the electric chair (who was an actor) when they give a wrong answer. The shocks were not real, but prior to the experiment, the subjects were given a small shock to influence them that the shocks in the experiment were true. After the experiment, Milgram assesses that “between the command and the outcome, there is a paramount force, which is the subject’s capacity for choosing their own behaviour” (p. 851). Although there were people who acted in immoral ways and increased the shock levels, there were also those who chose to renounce the unjust commands of authority, “providing affirmation of human morals and ideals” (p. 851). Therefore, people do have a choice in refusing to abide by authority’s rules and demands, but they choose not to because they do not want to suffer the…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past century, the field of Psychology has prospered, giving way to a more in depth knowledge and understanding of people’s social interactions with one another and what drives those connections. 20th century psychologist, Stanley Milgram, executed a series of Obedience to Authority test on random participants. As seen in the YouTube videos online and in class, Milgram’s study found that over 65% of the participants carried out the experiment, despite potentially hurting someone, due to the authority figure urging them to continue.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Moll, J., Zhan, R., Oliveira-Souza, R., Krueger, F. and Grafman, J. (2005). The neural basis of human moral cognition. Neuroscience, 6, 799-809…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the circumstances of the experiment were changed, and the teacher could choose the level of shock administered to the learner the results were drastically different. The teacher's hardly ever went beyond the minimum pain threshold. The only difference was the presence of the authority figure. This shows that people find it easier to disregard morals when…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do The Right Thing

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Do The Right Thing, Sal is the Italian-American owner of the neighborhood pizzeria. Having owned the shop for twenty-five years, Sal and his pizzas are known by everyone. On the surface, he seems like a nice and accepting person. But there are several instances in the film that seem to suggest that Sal may not be as accepting as he appears. For one, Sal always refers to the black customers as “them” and “they.” He also refers to hip-hop music “jungle music” multiple times. Additionally, early on in the film, we see Sal give money to Da Mayor in exchange for sweeping the block and learn that Sal does this often. And later on in the film, Sal offers Smiley some money after Sal’s son gets into an argument with him. In a way, this suggests that Sal is offering people money to make them go away. And Sal’s racist outburst at the film’s climax also suggests that Sal is not a complete nice guy. In the aftermath of Radio Raheem’s death, Sal’s explanation is simply “You do what you’ve gotta do.” It almost seems like he does not care about what he just witnessed.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We think that all actions are sound as long as they don’t hurt another person. But then we see people like Adolf Hitler. The man murdered millions of people. Yet, he had a bunch of supporters who helped him with these inhumane acts. But he did what he did in the name of morality, in the name of ‘respect for the greater race.’ The central idea of this essay is that morality depends largely on perception. What one finds wrong may not necessarily be seen as inappropriate by another. “I followed my own conscience.” “I did what I thought was right.” Didion questions the reader how many madmen have said this and meant it? Didion doesn’t believe that these men shelter themselves under the illusion of morality but actually believe their actions are moral and justified. Maybe we ourselves have said it before and been wrong. Our conscience isn’t always the best judge of things. But the concept of morality makes it okay to just be impulsive and do what we think is correct in the…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The U.S system of proposing ethical responsibility symbolizes some flaws as an official duty is “Under American law, liability generally exists for action, not inaction. We are each responsible for the harm we cause to others due to the lack of reasonable care” (Allred and Bloom 1). In this example, the U.S demonstrates that by establishing ethical responsibility as a law. Additionally, the United States will take the people’s responsibility for granted because they are forcing them to always be ethically responsible no matter the circumstance. Therefore, the U.S system should allow people to know when to be ethically responsible through their heart’s desire instead of doing it as a fixed political obligation. On the contrary, if our country’s legal system does not give reasonable consequences for not providing the best effort in solving a crucial circumstance, then people would have no true emotions. In most countries, people sometimes demonstrate themselves as true beings because they act in several ethically responsible ways in solving dire situations through non-motivations. One of the few reasons that people randomly demonstrate their act of being an ethically responsible person is “we see that compassion is deeply rooted in our brains, our bodies, and in the most basic ways we communicate; what’s more, a sense of compassion fosters compassionate behavior and helps shape the lessons we teach our children" (Gregoire 1). In this example, it represents how people randomly commit into doing something ethically responsible due to people having compassion as their hidden quality. To conclude, people’s compassion is their hidden quality of doing something really ethically…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1971 Phillip Zimbardo conducted a controversial study know as the Stanford prison experiment. The experiment was a psychological study of human reactions to being imprisoned and how the effects would interfere with the normal behaviors of both authorities and the inmates in prison. Zimbardo and his team hypothesized “that prison guards and convicts were self selecting of a certain disposition that would naturally lead to poor conditions.” Zimbardo used undergraduate volunteers to play the roles of the guards and the prisoners in a mock prison he created in the basement of the Stanford psychology building. He then recorded how both the prisoners and guards quickly adapted to their roles, and soon this lead to one-third of the authorities taking place in sadistic acts towards the prisoners, which was argued to have lead to psychologically harmful situations. Due to the appalling conditions of the prison, both sanitarily and psychologically the experiment ended on August 30, 1971 just six days after it began, which was eight days short of the foresighted fourteen days it was supposed to have lasted. Many similarities in the ethical concerns of the Stanford experiment were found in the Milgram experiment which was conducted in 1961 by Stanley Milgram one of Zimbardo’s high school friends.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After watching the film, Do The Right Thing, it should be included in the syllabus for this class Nationality, Race and Ethnicity because of the fact diversity is shown in cultural differences, assimilation, and is applied to all the qualities that make everyoney in the neighborhood different. In Spike Lee’s Do The Right Thing he presents a powerful message about our culture. Throughout the film there are examples of how people in real communities deal with violence and racism and their circumstances in today’s society.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Do The Right Thing Essay

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The bitter struggle for representation and control of black images has been almost as consistent as the profit driven system in Hollywood. From 1915 to 1950, the American film industry produced only a small number of films that transcended clichés and stereotypes about African American life. Race films such as The Scar of Shame (1926) and Within Our Gates (1920) highlighted recurring themes of black self-improvement and black literacy (Guerrero 147). Similar to Oscar Micheaux and many other black filmmakers, Spike Lee mesmerized audiences by giving them glimpses at social landscapes and material culture –dance, music, and sports – that is often unexplored in American cinema (Todd 15). By including these distinct choices of dance, music, and…

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “When stop chasing the wrong things, you give the right things a chance to catch you.” (Unknown) Many people get scored to show their courage for the right thing. What gives you and your peers to do the right thing with courage? Your peers and yourself do have courage because people do have that someone in life, that helps encourage them. It's just buried inside and you need to show people you're courage to do the right thing. People just don’t want to disappoint anyone.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Panget

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “most of our moral responses seem to be more a matter of intuitions and feelings than of reasoning and logical deduction – we are not always the rational creatures we would like to be” Gross, (1996)…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    How to Do the Right Things?

    • 3086 Words
    • 13 Pages

    As the data given by Dr. Bai Lixin, there are huge opportunities during Chinese urbanization. There are going to be 3 billion people move from the country sides to the cities.…

    • 3086 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays