Preview

Don John Character Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1480 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Don John Character Analysis
How much of who we are comes from our own inner predisposition, or mere interpretation from an outsider? Is someone obliged to become either a hero or villain by virtue of their existence, or are heroes and villains moulded over time from origins that could have taken either path? Analysing the preconceived ideas of Bastardy in Elizabethan society, it can be seen that the illegitimacy of Don John, “Shakespeare’s most passive villain” is the root of his villainy. Prejudgement, to pass judgement without sufficient knowledge, can lead to forming misconceptions that may transform someone or something’s image altogether. This pre judgemental attitude of Messina towards his birth circumstance crafts Don John to be an arguably uninteresting antagonist …show more content…
Through the system of primogeniture, illegitimate children in the Elizabethan era legally could not inherit property and did not have an equal social standing to ‘legitimate’ offspring. Connecting a bastard with the sinful action of lust out of wedlock, they were predetermined villains by society. This predetermination is personified with the “self fulfilling” prophecy that is Don John. Believing that his own blood delegates him an outsider and renders him evil, in his eyes the only alternative is to act the “plain dealing villain” and remain ostracized throughout his days. This is much similar to Aaron in Titus Andronicus, who found great pleasure in being evil as that was the expectation of all black men in the Roman Empire. Struggling with his own legitimacy, Don John speaks in prose, associated with lower characters, as opposed to the blank verse that would mirror his eloquence and upbringing, casting light on Don’s inner struggle and conflictions. Coming to terms with his birth and accompanying stereotypes, as he warns Conrad, “Let me be who I am and seek not to alter me” embracing his subsequent destiny so entirely that he deems himself incapable of change. “Concealing what you are and pretending to be what you are not is a widespread activity among Shakespeare’s good characters as well as among his villains.” Yet as Don John openly admits, “I cannot be said to be a flattering honest man, it …show more content…
Influencing all actions of the play yet having very few speaking lines for a main character, 40 to be exact, he operates as more of a plot device. Not a particularly compelling or complex villain, his intents exist; however, he fails to fulfill the “evil” mastermind role. Instead, his henchman Borachio acts the scheming villain, fabricating the plan for Hero’s ruin. Don John emerges as a relatively minor and passive character submissively accepting all Borachio’s demands, this passivity mirroring his lack of freedom in the society of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    He is a device used by Shakespeare to create tension and drama throughout the play. He is not the most complex villain among Shakespeare’s villainous characters, however he has a purpose. The thinness of his character teaches us about the knowledge people have of him in society: he is just seen as a ‘bastard’ and people don’t even want to be associated with him so don’t bother to learn anything about him. The fact that we don’t learn much about Don John also reminds us that the play isn’t meant to be a tragedy; it is supposed to teach us about the misunderstandings. It isn’t really supposed to analyse evil at all.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play, “Macbeth”, one dominant moral is made clear to the audience, do not tempt fate, let nature take its course. Some of the ways that Shakespeare achieves this is through the development of conflicts in the plot and also through dialogue, vivid imagery and metaphors created by the atmosphere in the play. The characters develop in the early acts to identify the protagonist and antagonists to the audience. The characters contribute rhetoric that reveals the disturbing of Shakespeare’s theory of the Great Chain of Being, the natural course of order.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The characters, namely Richard III and Richmond, offer an insight into the contextual concerns of the Elizabethan period. Their values offer modern audiences the opportunity to identify contextual features because the values are a product of the context, as is the text itself. Richard III is the epitome of the villain. He values deceit, devilishness, power and a disconnection from God and family which is against everything the pious Elizabethans believed in and this is depicted through his actions and language “I am determined to prove a villain” (I.i.30). The emphasis on good vs. evil and wrong vs. right was of the utmost significance to audiences because it taught them moral lessons. These moral lessons were important to Elizabethans because religion was an overarching aspect of their cultural context. Shakespeare combined the idea of Richard being deformed together with these values to emphasise the insidious nature of his personality and in effect, contrast him against the heroic Richmond.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history, many tragic heroic figures have encountered a downfall. Not because they are malevolent or villainous, but because of a character flaw. In William Shakespeare's’ tragedy, Macbeth the main character Macbeth embodies the tragic hero persona. Though he is believed to be of nobility, he is blinded by greed, ambition and power to a gruesome end by those very traits which bring him fortune. Macbeth’s tragedy of his heroism occurs through battling his self conscience, secondly by pride and ego, finally by fear to protect his ambition.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The novel Naveed by John Heffernan shows examples of how people can use certain situations to benefit themselves, while others choose not to become a victim and take up an altruistic lifestyle. “ I am not what has happened to me. I am what I choose to become.” - Carl Jung. A victim is someone who has been caught in a horrible situation. Therefore a victim mentality is taking on the traits of victim even if you have had no negative cause on you. Characters like Naveed are incredibly selfless and altruistic rather characters like Akmed choose to choose to dwell in self pity. Many of these characters are just like Naveed but many are like Akmed, this is where we see a stark contrast in this novel.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Shakespeare’s play Hamlet (1601) explores Hamlet’s growing insecurities and uncertainties, which stem from his attempt to find certainty and order within his changing transitioning society. Hamlet’s strong moral code and genuine grief at the beginning of the play contrasts with his descent into madness and deceit, as the corruption of the court begin to deteriorate his integrity and eventually lead to his tragic downfall. Throughout the play Shakespeare explores universal notions of authenticity contrasted with duplicity, the struggle between action and inaction and challenging the archetypal tragedian. Through an exploration of these themes, Shakespeare attempts to use the characters in his play to reflect his view on humanity and the shifting, conflicting paradigms between Medieval and Renaissance thinking.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    John is the typical Victorian husband. He is authoritative, strict, head of the household. He is a physician of “high standing”.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In nearly every tale, the story line contains multiple characters whom depict both good and “evil” qualities. In other words, they reveal opposite interpretations. These drastic differences can be drawn due to the lack of specifics in the reading. One interpretation may portray a character as pure and innocent. In another, they may appear at fault. Shakespeare’s famous play, Hamlet, illustrates this notion through an accumulation of characters. Of the many, Ophelia may strike one as the innocent virgin, or rather the selfish and corrupt whore. An overall analysis may be useful in determining which portrayal is more accurate.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mean Girls Vs Shakespeare

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In, ‘Much Ado About Nothing’ and ‘Mean Girls’, the antagonist receives a ghastly discipline for their utilization of duplicity and misleading to destroy others' lives. Don John the antagonist from, ‘Much Ado About Nothing’ received an appalling…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A man falls into a violent epileptic shock from sheer anger and jealousy. Othello is an aspiring man, who under delusional rage, allows revenge to blind him and so he betrays the trust of friendship and marriage. Actions alone can merit the characterization of evil simply because some deeds are too purely vicious and malignant, however William Shakespeare’s Othello creates a character of far greater intricacy than sole action- intricacy demonstrated by the development of language and expansion on plot and character.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The unavoidable result is that tragedy is old fashioned; Tis for royalty. If the excitement of tragic action were honestly a asset of a high character alone, it is unbelievable that mankind should cherish tragedy above all, let alone understand that. Tragedy is invoked when a character is ready to die to secure his one objective. In Shakespearean tragedies, from Hamlet to Macbeth, the primary struggle is that attempt of gaining their “rightful” position in society. Furthermore, Tragedy then is the outcome of a man’s pressure to evaluate himself.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Enduring Value - Othello

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Shakespeare’s masterpiece Othello has remained relevant beyond its original context not merely because of its universal themes of love and betrayal, but rather, due to its textual integrity, and the enduring value which is enhanced through the exploration of such issues, as marginalisation and the psychology of villainy. Shakespeare’s portrayal of Othello as being an outsider, and being “othered” by the Venetian society due to his different race, reflects traditional Elizabethan values and ethics regarding racial prejudice and inequality. These recurring issues, of social intolerance and racial bias are prevalent concerns in our modern society. Shakespeare’s expresses the nature of villainy through his antagonist, Iago, as he explores issues of betrayal and deceit. These issues, revolving around Othello’s passion, struggle and vulnerability, as an outsider, are representative of the human condition, hence making it pivotal, of why “Othello” has remained relevant in a different context.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamlet

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The notion of verisimilitude, which is chronic to humanity is exemplified in Shakespeare’s revenge tragedy Hamlet through the characters of Hamlet and Claudius. Noblemen such as King Hamlet were seen as individuals chosen by God; therefore Claudius’ fratricide against King Hamlet was seen as a supremely sinful deed in that context. The serious nature of his crime necessitated his façade. The use of first-person collective and plosives in ‘Our dear brothers’ death… and our whole kingdom be contracted in one brow of woe’ (1.2.1-4) emphasizes Claudius’ overwrought attention in maintaining his ‘honest’ and ‘honourable’ image. The notion of illusion against reality is further emphasised in the paradox of ‘that we wisest think on him… With one auspicious and one dropping eye’ which conveys Claudius’s insincerity and reflects man’s deceptive capabilities. Hamlet’s feigning of an ‘antic disposition’ symbolises his deceit in hiding his renaissance ideologies. Hamlet’s aphoristic statement “that one may smile, and smile, and be a villain”, after hearing of Claudius’s murderous act, evokes the central…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Krakauer wrote that Chris McCandless was, "green, and he overestimated his resilience, but was sufficiently skilled to last for sixteen weeks on a little more than his wits and ten pounds of rice"(Krakauer 182). In this quote it seems that Krakauer thought that McCandless was well equipped with his skills, so that made moderately prepared to survive in any situation. I feel that McCandless was rather prepared, yet again he never could have been fully prepared for the unexpected. My opinion is that McCandless was vaguely aware of the struggles that he would encounter in the Alaskan wilderness such as his epiphany that "happiness is only real when shared" was realized when his body was dying of starvation. I believed that he found what he was…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    If we are to experience tragic empathy with our protagonist, it is essential to acknowledge that he is no shallow killer but a man who moves tragically from a respected leader to a despised and isolated tyrant. It is this decline which constitutes his personal transformation. Helen Gardner describes Macbeth’s transformation as a path to damnation beginning at one extreme and ending at the other: “From a brave and loyal general, to a treacherous murderer, to a hirer of assassins, to an employer of spies, to a butcher, to a coward, to a thing with no feeling for anything but itself, to a monster and a hell-hound.”…

    • 1519 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays