Preview

Donald Eugene Smith Secular States Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
240 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Donald Eugene Smith Secular States Summary
This reading, written by Donald Eugene Smith, communicates his perspective on what being a secular state means, and what a secular state should encompass. Smith’s key idea is that a secular state includes the individual, the state and religion, and that these three factors have interconnected relationships with one another. However, in their relationships it is vital, or ideal, that there is exclusion of the third factor in each relationship. For example, Smith states that in the relationship between religion and the individual, it is vital that there is no interference from the state, thus ensuring freedom of religion.
In addition, Smith states the three key principles that he believes should result from the relationships between religion,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Study Guide for D&C 1- 76

    • 22061 Words
    • 89 Pages

    * Do you have a brief testimony that you can share regarding one of those principles? Please, record that brief testimony.…

    • 22061 Words
    • 89 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In some cases, the existence and the enforcement of secularism in states religious freedom impossible. In many republican states that deploy strong secularism, public visibility of religion is strongly prohibited. For example, in the case of France, women are not allowed to wear religious headscarf to public buildings such as the libraries and schools. This is a clear violation of religious freedom because Muslim women are now unable to keep their religious obligations because of the state’s strong emphasis on secularism.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Smith mentioned Juergensmeyer, who in “The New Cold War: Religious Nationalism Confronts the Secular State” (Juergensmeyer 1993) attempted to deal with the question of religious nationalism and the expected conflict between it and the secular society. While Juergensmeyer does deal with a nationalism that is religious, his definition seems to be influenced by secularization theory, presenting religion opposed to the secular society with no chance for the two to coexist. He explains that his approach in his book is to attempt to see the contrasting roles of religion and secular society through the eyes of “religious activists”:…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secularism is the belief that religion should not interfere with or be integrated into the public affairs of a society. Oxford dictionary defines "secular" as "concerned with the affairs of the world, not religious or spiritual" so in this sense all civil government is "secular". The only civil governments that are not fully secular in this sense are Vatican City and some fundamentalist Moslem states. The governments of all the major countries in the world – including Australia, the USA, Great Britain, New Zealand, Italy, India, etc are all secular governments. There are multiple factors which have contributed to the decline of religion's relevance for the integration and legitimation of modern life. The increasing pluralism and materialism of society alongside society's increasing individualism and dissatisfaction with traditional religions are major reasons for secularisation.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This abstract reading written by Robert N. Bellah, introduces the idea of a “Civil Religion” and argues that, apart from the normal religious traditions our nation follows, there is an unrecognized “Civil Religion” that becomes evident during national crisis or during high public ceremony. According to Bellah, “there actually exists alongside of and rather clearly differentiated from the churches an elaborate and well-institutionalized civil religion in America.” Bellah points out many different examples to prove his point of how “Civil Religion” has been expressed throughout history. First Bellah points out that every president since Washington has mentioned God in his inaugural speech. Next he points out that the presidents did not refer to any religion in particular. They did not refer to Jesus Christ, or to Moses, or to the Christian church. Last a significant point that Bellah makes refers to the Civil war and “Civil Religion”.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this article Stephen L. Carter expresses the great deal on the separation of church and state. Carter does a very good job at utilizing his rhetorical devices to really make sure we have the information embedded in our heads by the time we have finished the article. He does this job with the help of exemplification to give you multiple examples and leading proof of the separation of the church and state; the application of pathos because religion can sometimes be a touchy subject to some, so it brings out more of an emotional appeal; and, lastly, he utilizes repetition in a very different manner to keep the reader interested but to make it very clear the point he is getting across.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    For my final project topic, I have chosen to write about George Washington and his ideas of religious liberty. I chose this topic because of my degree plan, which is history. Also, the career I would like to pursue after my military career is to become a history teacher. I find this little know part of history fascinating and how much this shaped our country for future generations.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Secularism: The idea that ethical and moral standards should be formulated and adhered to for life on Earth, not to accommodate the prescriptions of a deity and promises of a comfortable afterlife. A secular state is the opposite of a theocracy.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secularists think that they have the accurate view of the United States. They are persuaded that United States should be a godless or secular state. They deem that religion was not an important aspect in the formation of the United States Constitution. This confirms that the Constitution farmers did not like religion to have any influence on the public policy. According to them religion and politics do not mix. Thus, religion and government should be kept far away from each other. There are a number of historical facts that are used by the secularists to prop up their views. Actually, the most significant historical fact is the absence of "God" in the constitution of United States. They say that this absence is extremely important. Secularists are persuaded that the absence of "God" confirms that there ought to be a strict division of state and…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Religion in much of the world is not in a state of general decline or public evisceration. In contrast, religion is being reshaped, challenged, and in some senses threatened by the processes of emerging late modernity (Brent Plate, 2002). Nation-states, for example, find their sovereignty is being challenged both from below and above, by pervasive alienation from the political process, new courtship rituals, scientific advances…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religion Vs Secularism

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Secularism is the principle of the separation of government and religion. Secularism offers comfort for people because it respects individuals and groups of which they are a part. It provides equality of all people because it does not provide privileges or special protection to religious people. When religion is absent, it creates an area of neutrality and welcomes others to come. This making…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ivers, G. (2011). Church and State. Web: World Book. Retrieved August 23, 2011, from World…

    • 2355 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A national government, Locke argues, is a society “constituted only for the procuring, preserving, and advancing their own civil interests,” (Locke, 1991, p. 17). It is the job of the government to provide its citizens with execution of equal laws as well as ensuring citizens are receiving their right to possessions such as life, liberty, health, and freedom from pain of body, (Locke, 1991, p. 17). Furthermore, Locke strongly supported the notion that the government should have no say in how people choose to celebrate their own religion, for him, an integral part of a secular society is that government has not right to influence religion, and religion has no right to influence government, (Locke, 1991, p. 24). This was due to the fact that Locke felt as though supporting or not supporting a certain religion was claiming that one religion was more valid than another, which is not up to the government to decide, (Locke, 1991, p. 25). Locke goes further to explain that no one in the world, including the government, has the just power to remove peoples’ civil rights upon the pretense of religion, (Locke, 1991, p.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Ronald Weed and John Heyking, the religious dimension is not defined by the tenets of Christianity or any other religion, rather, American’s religion is what Robert Bellah noted as it is ‘well–institutionalized Civil Religion’. This religion has certain elementary principles, values, rituals and holidays that are embodied in pertinent texts, artifacts, days and even people who serve as ‘saint’ of civil religion; they can be traditional leaders such as American Presidents.…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    States by Edward Said

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Edward Said emphasizes the scattered, alienated nature of the Palestinian people. In my opinion, Said clearly displays that it is unfair to ask “What is it you Palestinians want?”. Palestine, once recognized as a country and a community, is now shattered into a plethora of pieces. These pieces, or people each with memories and experiences, were sprinkled all across the world. It would seem impossible to share national pride when one’s country does not technically exist. Palestinians do not have a unified home where they can share their sense of culture and their similar beliefs. Many Palestinians “speak of awdah (return)” (650). They want to restore their country, and glue together the broken pieces. Even if Palestine could be restored as a country, would it ever be the same? One cannot erase history. The Palestinians can never truly regain what they want, which is their identity and ethnocentricity.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays