In his speech, John Kasich talks about how is father was a mailman and how he carried mail on his back. His father knew everybody on his mail route and how he would celebrate with everybody from birthdays to funerals. His grandfather worked in the coal mines and the government would rip him off from the paychecks. His grandfather had no control and the government could take advantage of him. John says the town he grew up in, people found they were out of work. People don’t have a decent wage increase in a long time and all their bills are going up. After he finishes his story, he tells the crowd how he will fix this and his views.…
The argument of this TV commercial is that the overall quality of life for men will improve if they use Old Spice deodorant. The audience includes women that are in a relationship with a man and is concerned about the way their significant other smells. The goal of this advertisement is to get women to buy Old Spice deodorant for their significant other. The commercial tries to accomplish its goal of getting women to buy Old Spice deodorant for men in several elements of rhetoric.…
Maureen Dowd is a well renowned political columnist for The New York Times who generally focuses on President Donald Trump. She describes herself as a progressive liberal who tends to align with a more socialistic view of the world. With the unexpected election of Donald Trump last November, Dowd now finds herself having a difficult time transitioning to an administration she is opposed to. Throughout Dowd’s articles, the main purpose is to convince the public that President Trump should only be a one term president.…
On June 16th at his very own Trump Tower in New York City, Donald Trump announced that he would be running for president. It was only thirty seconds into his speech when Trump committed his first fallacy. In an attempt to insult the intelligence of his fellow GOP candidates, he compared their incompetence toward air conditioners to their supposed inability to beat ISIS. “They didn’t know the air-conditioner didn’t work,” “How are they going to beat ISIS?” This is a bad example fallacy due to his use of an example that fails to prove the conclusion and has little connection to it. Despite the complete lack of relation between Trump’s example and his conclusion, he was still able to provoke the audience into feelings of contempt toward the other…
If there can be any objection to the administration, it can be the general disdain it has for reality. The President of the United States of America has employed the highest offense possible; he attempts to promote contradictory ideas at the same time and hold that they complement each other. Trump’s most important example should be his tone on the campaign trail. Trump’s campaign was run on two violently opposing ideas: that America is a perfect nation, that America is God’s nation, that America is the savior and protector of the world, America has the perfect culture that all nations should adopt, and our soldiers are the strongest, our products are the best, our land is the most beautiful, and that all nations should be subservient to American…
Hillary and Trump both had very persuasive speeches, they both used the three appeals very differently, like Hillary used the emotional appeal more and Trump used the logical and the ethical appeal more. They both were very well thought out speeches and they both spoke to the delegates at each convention plus the people that were watching on TV. They both made an a point to at least try and use all three rhetorical appeals to be the most persuasive they can be, but in the end, its up to what people in America see fit. Its up to the Americans to go over everything the candidate believes in and what they say in these speeches to decide who would be the better president. Hillary and Trump both have many reasons why they feel they are the best…
The final strategic error that Cruz suffered from was non-persuasive pathos. Pathos is employed in order to ignite emotion or feeling in an attempt to rally support. Cruz used effective descriptions and adjectives to employ pathos, but because of a lack of timeliness and empathy his pathos were not persuasive. At the beginning of his Prayer to France, Cruz effectively portrayed support and stood in solidarity with the people of Paris by asking God to, “lift up’, “comfort”, and “be with the people of Paris.…
Ted Cruz has been so far only GOP candidate to animadvert the same-sex court ruling sternly enough to ignite the social conservatives. While all other GOP candidates showed controlled reaction on the law, Cruz tears the court ruling down and takes the opposition of same-sex marriage as ‘front and center’ of his presidential election campaign. Most of the GOP candidates have criticized the law but ended up obeying it ‘showing respect’ to the law except for Cruz, who has initiated campaigning against same-sex marriage ruling in Iowa. He also has excoriated the court for upholding Obamacare. He suggests that the court has overstepped its bounds.…
Make America Great Again, Hillary for America, and A Future to Believe In, but what do these campaign slogans mean? Are they supposed to have a fixed meaning at all? Over the years as the political process has evolved politics have also become a key platform for narrative creation. Consequently, that creation of narratives may also be problematic because these campaign slogans and or sound bites, which will be discussed further into this series. The truthis that a text does not have a fixed meaning, as much as rhetorical critics would attempt to argue ideology is no longer a set of ideas and beliefs of a group or political party as the Merriam Webster dictionary suggest. Additionally, that definition has changed quite dramatically to mean the interpretation of ideals and beliefs of a group or political party key word there being ‘Interpretation.’And campaign managers know that and use that to their advantage. “Make America Great Again,” it purposely is open ended so that ideological narrative creation can take place. What does it mean? That’s just it, it could mean any amount of things to Trumps supporters, and however, the problem is that the rhetorical significance of these monikers is much less important than the idea of a great America. Politicians use these types of persuasive tactics by using an authority figures ethos or popularity and ability to speak.…
On Saturday, March 4, 1905, with patches of snow still remaining on the ground from the day before, Theodore Roosevelt gave a speech informing the people of the United States his intention as he was declared “Leader of the Free World.” Roosevelt was elected into office during a time while the economy was at a peak, expanding worldwide. His main points are to talk about his personal opinion on our power as a nation and things foreign and domestic.…
United States foreign policy in central and east Africa has remained relatively consisted since the 1990s. The Clinton, Bush and Obama administration worked with, as President Bill Clinton labelled ‘new generation’ of African leaders to help bring stability and Western oriented market-focused economic development policies. Western assistance composed on the premise of foreign aid for social development of schools, healthcare facilities and progression in human rights. It does not often cover when African states fall into chaos from wars, massacres and genocide, American presence is largely absent. The Mogadishu line, famous after eighteen U.S. soldiers died in a raid in 1993, still persists with America’s hesitation to use its military in Africa for missions beyond state interest and security. Rwanda experienced this first hand during its 1994 genocide.…
Hillary Clinton uses her emotional appeal (pathos) by trying to persuade her audience that she has a good heart and that she really does actually care about our country. Majority of that time that she spoke she used the word “We”. This make you feel as if everybody acts as one and that everyone is united together. “What kind of country “(we)” want to be”, “what kind of future “(we’ll)” build”, ““(we)” have to build an economy”, and ““(we)” need new jobs” were all things that came from out of Hillary’s mouth during this debate. She also tries to show her caring emotions by going on to say she knows the difficult choices that people have to face and the stress that it put people under. This gives the people that feeling of someone who understands…
“The Carnivore’s Dilemma”, an essay by Nicolette Hanh Niman, incorporates rhetorical elements, such as logos, ethos, and rhetorical questions, in an attempt to convince the audience that meat itself is not the root of global warming. Written from a rancher’s point of view, the essay relies on studies and logic to prove itself. Niman starts out with a short acknowledgement that the meat industry has a hand in the increasingly noticeable global climate change. She then quickly changes gears, stating that the studies that show the meat industry is a major player in global warming only take the prevailing methods of producing meat into account and spews facts that show the flip side of the food industry.…
In order to examine both the POTUS account and Donald Trump’s account’s use of evaluative language to communicate with their imagined audience, it is important to define the term imagined audience and examine the imagined audience of each of the accounts. The imagined audience can be defined as “the conceptualisation of the people with whom we are communicating, our audience (Litt, 2012:331).” In Donald Trump’s case, it is clear that his tweets are targeted at Americans, his followers and supporters. This is demonstrated in tweets 17-20, which use terms like ‘America first,’ ‘American spirit,’ ‘American people’ and “make America great again.” These tweets not only display the use of positive appreciation because he is explicitly stating his appreciation for America, but also…
As Michelle Obama said: “Being president does not change who you are. But it reveals who you are.” During the first few months, he is causing more problems than there was before. Getting rid of DACA, trying to ban Muslims, and much more. Donald Trump is abusing his powers. He’s saying “let’s get rid of immigrants,” when his wife is one. It’s not fair that people who are immigrant workers in the US, pay taxes, make money, go to school, have to be deported back home just because the so-called president does not like their race, religion, ethnicity, or sexuality. It’s cruel and unfair to them. I understand if you don’t like a particular race but do not make an assumption about who they are as a group of people, calling Mexicans criminals and rapist…