Preview

Donoghue V Stevenson

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1421 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Donoghue V Stevenson
Suman Siva

Prof. Jeong Chun Phuoc

012014111647

Assignment 2 – Weekly Case Law Critique

WEEK 2 CASE LAW ON
DONOGHUE V STEVENSON (1932)
Summary
On August 26th 1928, Donoghue (plaintiff) and a friend were at a case in Glasgow, Scotland. Her friend ordered / purchased a bottle of ginger beer for Donoghue. The bottle was in an opaque bottle (dark glass material) as Donoghue was not aware of the contents. After, Donoghue drank some and her friend lifted the bottle to pour the remainder of the ginger beer into the glass. A remains of a snail in a state of decomposition dropped out of the bottle into the glass. Donoghue later complained of stomach pain and was diagnosed with gastroenteritis and being in a state of severe shock by a doctor. Donoghue subsequently took legal action seeking £500 damages against the manufacturer of the ginger beer,
Stevenson (Defendant). She was unsuccessful at trial and appealed the decision to the House of Lords.
Issue
1. Is there liability in negligence for injury caused by another in the absence of a contract?
2. Does the manufacturer of a product owe duty of care to the consumer to take reasonable care that the product is free from defect?
Judgement
The issue was complex because her friend had purchased the drink, and that a contract had not been breached. So Donoghue’s lawyers had to claim that Stevenson had a duty of care to his consumers and that he had caused injury through negligence. The leading judgement, delivered by Lord Atkin in 1932, concluded that Stevenson should be responsible for the well-being of individuals who consumes their product. Among the reasons given by the judges that is related to the issues above:
1. Le Lievre v Gould established that "under certain circumstances, one man may owe a duty of care to another, even though there is no contract between them”
2. Negligence claims can be brought against people who owe you a duty of care.
3. A manufacturer has a duty of care to the ultimate consumer if either the



References: Donoghue v Stevenson (1932). Taylor, Martin R. (2008). "The Most Famous Litigant". Donoghue v Stevenson Digital Resources. SCLR - Resources - Donoghue v. Stevenson Case Report. 2015. SCLR - Resources - Donoghue v. Donoghue v Stevenson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. 2015. Donoghue v Stevenson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Donoghue v Stevenson - Case Brief Wiki. 2015. Donoghue v Stevenson - Case Brief Wiki. [ONLINE] Available at: http://casebrief.wikia.com/wiki/Donoghue_v_Stevenson

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    However, the court concluded that his injury resulted from the retained sponge, was the start of…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Michael Barnes bought a 500g of caustic soda called “DRANO” at a local store named Glendale Chemical Products Pty Ltd for him to use to unblock a pipe in the shower recess. Mr. Barnes, kneeling down, poured hot water to the drain and immediately sprinkled the caustic soda as advised by a friend. The mixture of hot water and the caustic soda caused a bad reaction that resulted the liquid to gush out of the drain and splashed in contact with his face and eyes.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Summary

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The tort of negligence in this scenario includes the five essential elements of negligence, duty, breach of duty, the breach being the cause of injury, proximate, and the resulting damages (Lucas, 2008). In a case of negligence the individual or company may be held liable not only with negligence but sometimes with trespass, injury, and even mental or emotional harm (Lucas, 2008). However, the law requires these elements are proven in order to recover in a law suit against a torfeasor for negligence (Melvin,…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legt 1710 Assignment 1

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    * Jones L Introduction to Business Law 1st, 2011, C11 the Tort Law of Negligence. P342…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He was taken to a hospital to pump his stomach. He vomited the two capsules…

    • 4749 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hsa 515 Law and Health

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The first element that a plaintiff must prove is that the defendant owed him or her legal duty of care. Generally, this duty of care is a legal notion that states that people owe anyone around them or anyone who could be around them a duty to not place them in situations of undue risk of harm. Proving this element will largely depend on the facts of the situation. After the plaintiff has proved that a legal duty of care existed, he or she must then prove that this duty was breached. Generally, courts will use the standard of a ‘reasonable person’ when it comes to this question. Specifically, this means that the judge or jury must view the facts of the situation and decide what a reasonable person would have done in a similar situation. If this reasonable person would have acted differently than the defendant, it’s likely that it will be found that the duty was breached. Causation is the most complicated element of negligence. It means that the plaintiff must prove that the defendant either directly or indirectly caused the injuries and damages suffered by the plaintiff because of the breach of the duty of care. This element has confused even the most respected legal minds over time, and its proof should not be taken lightly. Last, a plaintiff in a negligence case must prove a legally recognized harm, usually in the form of physical injury to a person or to property. It is not enough that the defendant failed to exercise reasonable care. The failure to exercise reasonable care must result in actual damages to a person to whom the defendant owed a duty of care (FindLaw 2012). These damages can be actual costs such as medical expenses and lost income or intangible costs such as pain and suffering or loss of companionship.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cunningham and Attorney General for British Columbia v. Tomey Homma and Attorney General for Canada (1902)…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Elements Of Negligence

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page

    Negligence law states that a person or an organization is generally liable when they negligently injure others.…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    "Plessy v. Ferguson." Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., 12 May 2015. Web. 27 Apr. 2017.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hsc Legal Studies Unit 2

    • 1766 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Breach of the duty of care: A person may be liable for negligence in a personal injury case if his breach of duty caused another person’s injuries.…

    • 1766 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Movie: Twelve Angry Men

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages

    grave decision and that the court would not entertain any acts of mercy for the…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Robbins Collections School of Law University of California at Berkley. (n.d.). The Common Law and Civil Law Traditions. Retrieved from http://www.berkley.edu…

    • 1862 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lacy, Andrew, A Duty to Rescue? (2004) The Bark Network < http://www.bark.net.au/Society/socart2.htm> at 18 August 2005.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Bailii. United kingdom house of lords decisions. Daniel m’naghten’s case (1843). Retrieved from http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1843/J16.html…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Probable cause and Reasonable suspicion are two legal terms used in the United States legal system, in this essay I will be comparing and contrasting the two terms as well as providing examples. Probable cause is the level of facts and evidence required to obtain a warrant for, or as an exception to the warrant requirements for, making an arrest or conducting a personal or property search, etc. when criminal charges are being considered. Courts usually find probable cause when there is a reasonable basis for believing that a crime may have been committed (for an arrest) or when evidence of the crime is present in the place to be searched (for a search). Under exigent circumstances, probable cause can also justify a warrantless search or seizure. Persons arrested without a warrant are required to be brought before a competent authority shortly after the arrest for a prompt judicial determination of probable cause. Reasonable suspicion is the legal standard by which a police officer has the right to briefly detain a suspect for investigatory purposes and frisk the outside of their clothing for weapons, but not drugs. While many factors contribute to a police officer’s level of authority in a given situation, the reasonable suspicion standard requires facts or circumstances that would lead a reasonable person to believe that a suspect has, is, or will commit a crime. While reasonable suspicion does not require hard evidence, it does require more than a hunch. A combination of particular facts, even if each is individually insignificant, can form the basis of reasonable suspicion. For example, police may have reasonable suspicion to detain someone who fits a description of a criminal suspect, a suspect who drops a suspicious object after seeing police, or a suspect in a high crime area who runs after seeing police. Probable cause and reasonable suspicion are both governed by the 4th amendment which states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons,…

    • 772 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics