Though most people know about the general concepts of life in Soviet Russia, they do not know many specific details about it. Background knowledge on Soviet Russia is what is needed in order to fully comprehend Dostoevsky’s symbolic representation of late 19th, early 20th, century Russia throughout the novel, but most specifically, within the dreams. For instance, in January of 1850 Dostoevsky arrived at a Russian labor camp located in Siberia. These camps, most commonly known as Gulags, were first established as an alternative to prison and for the most part they provided all of the penal labor in the USSR. The prisoners in these labor camps usually for an average of 14 hours a day performing menial, but labor intensive tasks, such as cutting down trees, mining, building railroads, etc. Though we do not know the exact number of people who were killed within these camps, we can approximate a range of anywhere from 1.6 million to 15 million people who were directly murdered by the soldiers. (Of Russian Origin: the GULAG) This background knowledge helps the reader understand why Dostoevsky felt hostile towards the Russian government; however there are still some skeptics whom believe that Dostoevsky had no reason to be discontent with Russian officials.
While it is true that Dostoevsky was condemned to an execution, and that the Tsar pardoned him from the death penalty, it was actually a mock execution which had been set up by the Tsar. This was a common practice at that time period, however what was uncommon was the way that Tsar Nicholas cruelly orchestrated the scenario, giving explicit instructions that the men were to have their lives spared only after the men were standing with the noose around their necks. After being pardoned, Dostoevsky was shipped off to a Siberian gulag where he spent the next six years before having his sentence lifted. Many of the men who were sent to Siberia did not survive the extreme conditions and laborious days, and those who did survive would often experience mental breakdowns or health failures. “Dostoevsky had long suffered from what he referred to as ‘disordered nerves’, now the hardship of his incarceration along with the terrible stress which immediately preceded it, caused his health to break down and he began to have the epileptic seizures which were to torment him for the rest of his life.” (Dost. Background) Regardless of the fact that Dostoevsky managed to survive the gulag, he never fully recovered from trauma that the Tsar of Russia purposefully caused him. If it is accepted that Dostoevsky had reasonable reason to carry resentment against Russia, then the next argument that one might consider is why did Dostoevsky choose not write Crime and Punishment as a very blatant verbal assault against Russia, instead of through parallels and symbolism? The reason for this is quite simply because Dostoevsky’s sentence had been pardoned by the Tsar. If Dostoevsky wanted to remain a free man, he had to be very careful to avoid being seen as a threat to the Tsar, and this meant that he had to watch not only what he said/wrote but also who he associated with. By using the dreams to satirize Russian government, Dostoevsky managed to ensure that people would be able to identify the parallels between the dreams and Russia (since at this time period people still believed in seers, and prophesies, who often used dreams as a way of seeing the future). However by doing this, Dostoevsky also gave himself a safety net of sorts, because if the Russian Tsar were to notice of the parallels Dostoevsky could simply state that the dreams were entirely fictitious and that there was no underlying meaning to the dreams. Most people today view dreams as fantasy, a figment of ones imagination, and so many will disregard anything that occurs within dreams as pure fiction. However in the time period when Dostoevsky wrote Crime and Punishment, many people still believed in seers who were able to see into the future through dreams. These dreams were never straight forward, and relied on the seer or the subject of the dream to interpret what it symbolized. For this reason, dreams were the perfect method of choice for conveying the points that Dostoyevsky wanted to convey, it allowed Dostoevsky to be extremely subtle when denouncing Russian government. One case where this is shown is in the iconic mare dream in which Rodia dreams about a particular time in his childhood where he saw a mare being beaten to death by a group of intoxicated men. Though no one can truly know what Dostoevsky was attempting to convey with this dream, one can interpret it as a parallel between the drunken peasant Mikolka and the Russian Government because they were both intoxicated, one by alcohol and one by power. It is important that it is stated that Mikolka was intoxicated because just as alcohol can cloud a persons judgment, so can the possession of ultimate power/authority over other human beings. Though the Russian governments “intoxication” was much less apparent than Mikolka’s, it did have similar effects that caused them to behave rashly when they felt that someone was questioning their authority or self declared power. This was shown in the dream when Mikolka’s sickly mare is unable to do what he insisted she was able to do causing those watching the scene start to laugh. Mikolka sees this as a personal insult to his authority and this cause him to lose touch with reality. Mikolka is insistent that his mare will gallop, “[flogging] the little mare furiously, with quickened blows, exactly as though he really believed she could gallop.” (Dost. 214) He refuses to listen when the onlookers tell him the mare is dying, he simply responds by saying “Mind your own business! I’ll do what I please….I want her to gallop, and she’ll gallop!”(Dost. 215) Just like Mikolka, the Russian governmental officials are extremely proud, yet insecure, people. They take offense to the tiniest things, and quickly become defensive and irrational if they feel that they are having their authority questioned. This particular character trait is what made it necessary for Dostoevsky to disguise his antagonism towards Russia within the dreams.
This character trait was emphasized in the final dream of the book because in this dream the men who are infected by this new parasite begin to see themselves as better than those around them, “never had they considered themselves so clever and so unhesitatingly right” (Dost. 1544). This parasite is the propaganda that was spread throughout Russia at this time, and it is suggesting that the people of Russia are not acting in unison but rather as a sea of individuals and it was the conflicting ideas and Napoleonic complexes which caused them to turn on each other, killing “each other in senseless rage… soldiers flung themselves upon each other, slashed and stabbed… everybody was on edge…everything went to wrack and ruin.” (Dost. 1545-1546) Dostoevsky’s inclusion of this particular dream, as well as his placing it in the epilogue to the book, makes it appear as if this is what Dostoevsky predicts will happen to his country if they continue on the same place. He uses this particular dream in the same way that the seers of his time used theirs: a prediction of what is to come.
Despite the fact that Dostoyevsky managed to survive his time in the Siberian labor camps, many of his contemporaries did not and Dostoyevsky’s health never did improve. What I find most interesting about this man, is his ingenuity when it came to hiding a message between the lines. Upon first glance, no one would suspect that this dream of a mare getting beaten to death was actual a portrayal of his life in Russia. What’s even more interesting is the last dream of the book which ends with the infected society ultimately falling apart and failing. Isn’t this what actually does end up happening? It is almost as if Dostoyevsky was trying to warn those around him that they were on a path leading to failure.
Works Cited
Dostoyevsky, Fyodor. Crime and Punishment. Trans. Sidney Monas. New York: Signet Classics, 2006. Print.
"Of Russian Origin: The GULAG." The GULAG –Russiapedia of Russian Origin. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. .
“Biography of Fyodor Dostoevsky” ProQuest Literature: 2006.
Cited: Dostoyevsky, Fyodor. Crime and Punishment. Trans. Sidney Monas. New York: Signet Classics, 2006. Print. "Of Russian Origin: The GULAG." The GULAG –Russiapedia of Russian Origin. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2012. . “Biography of Fyodor Dostoevsky” ProQuest Literature: 2006.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The reason why most of the important sources from this book are private diaries written by Soviet kids during the 1970s is because it gives the readers an opportunity to compare personal thoughts of young people of western cultural products from diaries. In this way it recreates a real social history of the Brezhnev era.…
- 1292 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Over time, the Russian land and people have changed to accommodate for their needs but they have also kept some aspects the same whether it was for the better or the worse. Throughout 1801 and 1939, many things changed in the Soviet Union while keeping many things the same.…
- 1114 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment centers on Raskolnikov, a man who chooses to murder a common pawnbroker while he struggles with guilt, alienation, and pride. The choice to commit murder creates a division between Raskolnikov and society because he violates the moral laws governing society. In Crime and Punishment, the rift between Raskolnikov and society is both alienating and enriching for his character and demonstrates Dostoevsky’s opinion of an individual’s place in society.…
- 899 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Amy Knight begins her book, How The Cold War Began: The Gouzenko Affair And The Hunt For Soviet Spies, by stating, “There was nothing ordinary about Igor Gouzenko.” She was right, his life was anything but ordinary. Igor Gouzenko was born in 1919 in a village called Rogachov, Russia located near Moscow. Gouzenko’s mother went into labour during the time of the Russian Civil War (1917-1922). It was a time of uprisings and famine. As his mother laid in bed she could hear the anguish of women and children, the cries of those who had been injured, guns being fired, and she could not help but think, “A new life is about to be born. What is in store for it?” What laid ahead for Igor Gouzenko was a life of fear, from being a young child and the…
- 163 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Bibliography: Auty, Robert, and Dimitri Obolensky. 1976. "An Introduction to Russian History (Companion to Russian Studies;1)." Brisol, Great Britain : Cambridge University Press Ltd.…
- 1742 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The concept of Stalinism, being the ideologies and policies adopted by Stalin, including centralization, totalitarianism and communism, impacted, to an extent, on the soviet state until 1941. After competing with prominent Bolshevik party members Stalin emerged as the sole leader of the party in 1929. From this moment, Stalinism pervaded every level of society. Despite the hindrance caused by the bureaucracy, the impact of Stalinism was achieved through the implementation of collectivization and the 5-year plans, Stalin’s Political domination and Cultural influence, including the ‘Cult of the Personality’. This therefore depicts the influence of Stalinism over the Soviet State in the period up to 1941.…
- 1040 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Fyodor Dostoevsky’s novel, Crime and Punishment, riddles its characters with physical, sexual, and psychological violence. Thomas C. Foster asserts in the chapter “More than it’s Going to Hurt You: Concerning Violence” of How to Read Literature like a Professor that no violence exists for its own sake; Rather, violence is useful in contributing to the novel’s overall message. Crime and Punishment is powerful demonstrating the control of conscience, guilt and otherwise, over the life of man. Quite typically violence erupts due to a sick combination of id and ego. The relationship between Semyon Zaharovitch Marmeladov, a town drunk of St. Petersburg, and his children and spouse, Katerina Ivanovna, is built upon a myriad of violence catalyzed by guilt. This relationship is the quintessence of lives tyrannized by guilt resulting in a vicious circle of ferocity.…
- 414 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Each character from these novels experienced the difficulties of life in the Soviet Union differently. This is because their situations were different. Each character has a different background which affects how their life is impacted by the purges of the 1930’s. In Sofia Petrovna the personal standing and background of Sofia affects how she overcomes the difficulties. Since she was a widowed mother of someone who was a prisoner in the Gulag she had different experiences dealing with government officials than other people would. In Gulag Voices each character had different backgrounds but all ended up in the Gulag system because they were labeled as saboteurs. In the Soviet Union status did not matter when the purges arrived the educated and…
- 165 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Semyonova’s bleak account of Russian peasantry stands in stark contrast to the romanticized view so common among upper-class Russians. Peasant villages were places of brutal violence, death, sickness, and hard labor. Yet this is the view we need to see and understand. At the time Semyonova performed her research, Russia was barely twenty years away from the most significant period of change in its history – and a revolution that would change the world. By virtue of their numbers, the peasants (and those who claimed to speak for them) would come to play a major role in the decades of turmoil…
- 796 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Bibliography: Bernstein, Laurie, and Robert Weinberg. Revolutionary Russia: A History In Documents. New York, New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. Print.…
- 2030 Words
- 9 Pages
Best Essays -
By the end of Dostoyesky's Crime and Punishment, the reader is no longer under the illusion of the possible existence of "extraordinary" men. For an open-minded reader, and even perhaps the closed-minded ones too, the book is a journey through Raskolnikov's proposed theory on crime. It is a theory based on the ideas that had "been printed and read a thousand times"(313) by both Hegel and Nietzsche. Hegel, a German philosopher, influenced Dostoyesky with his utilitarian emphasis on the ends rather than the means whereby a superman existed as one that stood above the ordinary man, but worked for the benefit of all mankind. Nietsche's more selfish philosophy focused on the rights to power which allowed one to act in a Hegelian manner. In committing his crime, Raskolnikov experienced the ultimate punishment as he realized that his existence was not that of the "extraordinary" man presented in his…
- 754 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Kulaks: a category of relatively affluent farmers in the later Russian Empire, Soviet Russia, and early Soviet Union.…
- 1115 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“Nobody, but he who has felt it, can conceive what a plaguing thing it is to have a man’s mind torn asunder by two projects of equal strength, both obstinately pulling in contrary direction at the time.” (Laurence Sterne) In Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment, it is this exact miscalculation that leads the protagonist Raskolnikov (Rodya) to his ultimate mental, physical and social demise. Similarly, the theme of the novel directly correlates to Sterne’s quote, as Dostoyevsky delves into the psychology of a criminal, centering the novel on a murder and its after-affects on the transgressor.…
- 704 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The two sharply contrasted settings in Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoyevsky are symbolic of how turbulent Raskolinikov’s mind becomes after he murders Alyona Ivanov. In the bustling and disgusting Saint Petersburg, Raskolinikov has to suddenly battle the guilt that comes with Alyona’s demise yet once Raskolinikov confesses to his crime and serves his sentence in the lonely and removed Siberia; his mind relaxes. Similar to The Stranger, most of Crime and Punishment takes place during the summer, when the hot sun muddles Raskolinikov’s mind as it did to Meursaults’s. While Meursault uses the sun as an excuse to why he committed murder, Raskolinikov tried to justify his actions to Sonya; but ultimately Raskolinikov definitely comprehended his own guilt and spent most of the novel attempting to ease his shame.…
- 484 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In the book “Crime and Punishment”, Dostoevsky explores the path of Raskolnikov who has faced many difficulties and obstacles throughout his life. He commits murder and is faced with the long and extremely painful journey of seeking redemption. Raskolnikov believes that by the law of nature, men have been divided into two groups of “ordinary” and “extraordinary”.…
- 785 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays