Preview

double jeopardy in india

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2876 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
double jeopardy in india
RIGHTS OF AN ACCUSED:
‘DOUBLE JEOPARDY’
CONTINOUS ASSESSMENT-III FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE

SUBMTTED BY: Wayne Rooney

SUBMITTED TO: PROF. K.L. BHATIA

INTRODUCTION
________________________________________________________________
It is a well-settled principle of law that a man must not be put twice in peril for the same offence or must not be punished for the same offence. Our Indian Constitution guarantees the aforementioned right under Article 20(2) of the Constitution1 along with other rights such as equal protection of laws2, freedom of speech and expression3, freedom of practice and propogation of religion4, freedom of assembly and association5, freedom to move freely6 and to reside and settle anywhere in India7 and many more.
As has been said above, when a person has been convicted for an offence by a competent court, the conviction serves as a bar to any further criminal proceedings against him for the same offence. This principle is known as “Doctrine of Double Jeopardy”.8 The roots of the doctrine of Double Jeopardy can be traced to the Latin maxim 'Nemo debet bis vexari'.
If a person is indicted again for the same offence in a court, he can plead, as a complete defence, his formal acquittal or conviction, or, as it is technically expressed, he can take the plea of autrefois acquit or autrefois convict.9 The principle was in existence in India even prior to the commencement of the Constitution,10 but now the same has been given the status of a constitutional, rather than a mere statutory guarantee.11

Article 20(2) reads as, “No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once.”
Article 14, Constitution of India.
3 Article 19(1)(a), Constitution of India.
4 Article 25(1), Constitution of India.
5 Article 19(1)(c), Constitution of India.
6 Article 19(1)(d), Constitution of India.
7 Article 19(1)(e), Constitution of India.
8 MP Jain, Indian Constitutional Law, 6th Edition, LexisNexis

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    He entered a guilty plea as to the third and fourth counts. possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and unlawful possession of ammunition by a person.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ring Vs Arizona Case Study

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    "It must be a jury determination that [he] is guilty of every element of the crime with which he is charged, beyond a reasonable doubt." (515 S Ct. 506 (1995)…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    __7__ Either indictment by a grand jury followed by arraignment, or arraignment on an information…

    • 1453 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It has come to my knowledge that the statement “you are innocent until…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment states, no person shall "be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb." Not only does the Double Jeopardy Clause defend individuals from being put in jeopardy of life or limb, but it also protects against other punishments such as monetary fines and prison terms.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Loss Of Self-Control Case

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Convicted of murder. Conviction upheld. Qualifying trigger under s55 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 – must constitute circumstances of an extremely grave character and D must have a justifiable sense of being seriously wronged. Neither occurred.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government has also tackled the double jeopardy rule which states that, in English law, anyone cleared of a crime in court cannot be retried for the same crime at a later date.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Once the arraignment is over, the case will truly begin, and a strategy will be discussed and put…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to convict anyone of a criminal offence, there must be a law, which…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Double jeopardy, in law, is the protection against the use by the state of certain multiple forms of prosecution. In general, in countries observing the rule of double jeopardy, a person cannot be tried twice for the same crime based on the same conduct. In U.S. law, double jeopardy does not attach until the jury is sworn in a jury trial or until the first witness is sworn in a bench trial. There are several examples of double jeopardy. An easy and simply understood example is if a man is tried for murder, he cannot be tried for manslaughter. This is because manslaughter and murder may be two different crimes but are based on similar conduct. But if the same man committed murder and robbed a store, the Fifth Amendment does not protect him. Double jeopardy also keeps the state from retrying a person for the same crime after he has been proven not…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    given any type of intermediate sanction. It is said that only the person searching out their…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    picture timeline

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    IV. No man shall be punished unless his crime be first made manifest, neither shall he be punished unless he be first brought to trail in the presence of his accusers, and they have met face to face, and the trail having been conducted according to law, and the crime made manifest in their presence, the punishment may be inflicted.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This year in the Unites States, countless murderers, rapists, thieves, and other criminals will walk free among you and your loved ones due to the existence of a law which protects them from their arrest. It doesn't matter whether these acquitted convicts have confessed, or new evidence surfaces, they will not be sentenced. This bill, which has the ability to create corruption in the ordinance process and keep a killer from being locked up, is known as the double jeopardy law.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Double Jeopardy One of the most significant principles of constitutional, criminal and administrative law, which claims "no one can be punished twice for the same crime", applies in most countries. In America, this principle is known as protection against double jeopardy. However, it should be noted that in the United States it has its own features, than in European countries. Thus a detailed consideration of this principle is a necessity for the protection of a human rights and freedoms in the USA. Double jeopardy clause is one of the most important principles that protect human rights.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Double Jeopardy

    • 3623 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The ancestry of the doctrine against double jeopardy are to be found in the well-established maxim of the English Law “ Nemo Debet Bis Vexari” – a man shall not be brought into danger for one and the same offence more than once. When a person has been convicted for an offence by a competent court, the conviction serves as a bar to any further criminal proceedings against him for the same offence. The idea is that no ought…

    • 3623 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays