Preview

Dr. Martin Luther King's A Time To Break Silence

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
934 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dr. Martin Luther King's A Time To Break Silence
Dr. Martin Luther King Jrs essay A Time to Break Silence was a small but significant piece of his life and career as a minister, Nobel Peace Prize winner, husband, father, civil rights activist, president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and an important historical figure for future generations.

In this essay, Dr. King discusses why the Vietnam War is important to him. He starts with his first reason, is that he felt like the military had given a promise of hope to the poor, when the government didnt really have the funds or intentions to fulfill their dreams. He felt that the war was almost like an attack on the poor, because it lured them to their death, in a sense.

His second reason is recognizing the reality of the war
…show more content…

King talks about churches, synagogues, and communities bonding together to protest the war, and how American government officials are making peace impossible because they arent willing to give up overseas investments. He feels that America is too materialistic, and that a true revolution of values would soon change the ideals of the people, because war is not the way to peace, justice, and love. He felt that if change was not made, America would approach a spiritual death. He felt that rather than bombing to end communism, America shouldve tried to make positive steps to defeating communism.

In the last segment of his this essay, The People are Important, Dr. King says that we must support the revolutions, and make the final analysis of our loyalties. He says that love is the ultimate force of life, and is a necessity for man. He says that we can no longer afford to hate.

Henry Thoreaus essay Civil Disobedience is similar to Dr. Kings, becauseThoreau also feels like the government is run by the majorities, and not the conscious of the people. He feels that the majorities decide right and wrong in the government, and that it is unfair and unjust.

Like Dr. King, Thoreau feels that the military is just a tool to the government, disposable lives, an army of machines. Thoreau disagrees with the government, and feels like it is too involved in peoples


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    King starts his essay with addressing that he never usually answers statements that criticize his work. He goes on to state what role he plays in the south and why he is in Birmingham. He is there because Birmingham is the most segregated city in America and injustice is most prevalent there. He writes that nations such as Asia and Africa are moving forward with gaining political independence, but America was still moving with incredibly slow speed trying to obtain the same goal. There are examples of the horrors that colored people have gone through; parents getting lynched, people getting abused by officers, not being shown respect, and having to explain to their children why the cannot be in the same area as white people. He goes on to talk…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. was a Baptist minister, activist and more importantly, a leader in the African American Civil Rights Movement hailing from Albany, Georgia. The audience consisted of mostly African American activists and supporters but also white elected officials and government officials as well as average white citizens. The purpose of King’s speech was to convey the difficult life African Americans have been faced with ever since Americans forcibly brought African natives to become slaves and work for the white men. King is speech, he effectively succeeded in motivating and aspiring the nation to ponder giving equal rights to their fellow African American citizens.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King, Thoreau also uses appeals in his "On the Duty of Civil Disobedience." Thoreau uses emotional appeal's however they are not as evident as that of King's. Thoreau uses emotional appeal in his mention of Cesar and Christ. His logical and ethical appeals however are more so evident, and make the essay a very successful one in this aspect. "I heartily accept the motto, "That government is best which governs least"…"that government is best which governs not at all"; and when men are prepared for it, that will be the kind of government which we will have." (1) Throughout Thoreau's essay the same example is present and makes the audience think more critically which may in turn lose his reader. Thoreau's essay prolongs the real issues with unnecessary details that in turn confuses the audience on what exactly he is trying to say. Whereas Dr. King is straightforward with his details allowing the reader to read along…

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King was influenced by the works of Transcendentalist Henry David Thoreau. He studied his work while at Morehouse, and was impressed with his concept of civil disobedience (McElrath & Andrews, 2007). King was intrigued by the possibilities of Thoreau’s method. Thoreau stated that it was better to “break the law than to participate in the injustice toward another person” (McElrath & Andrews, 2007).…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry David Thoreau wrote “Civil Disobedience”, in 1849, to explain his distrust for the government. He focuses greatly on how the government is actively working against the people. Thoreau also discusses all throughout his essay about how the ones who serve our country are not considered as important as the ones within the cabinet. In an excerpt from “Civil Disobedience”, Thoreau uses pathos to show how the government is corrupt by using strategic syntax, similes, and metaphors.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kings starts with an idea that there are four basic steps to a nonviolent campaign. “Collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist, negotiation, self purification, and direct action (King).” He does a great job in this essay pointing out the problems and determining that injustice very much does exist. King states, while in a jail cell, that the very reason he is…

    • 1822 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The clergymen called King an extremist for standing up for what was right and wanting to march. King hoped that the march would turn negative energy into a positive one, to support his thoughts king would often use example from other leaders who decided to step up and make a change. King often relied on the example set by Socrates, Paul and Jesus so that the clergymen could see that oppression is still going on. King goes on to state that “Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressors; it must be deemed by the oppressed”, and that’s exactly what was happening. They were demanding what was morally right. King brought to the light that being poor does not only relate to those who have less, financially but emotionally also. This is seen in the injustice practiced during this time. Even though the odds were against all who were fighting for change Dr. King remained very positive and hopeful he believed that even if they did not get all they wanted they would leave a mark, hoping that eventually things would get…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King's Error". The article non effectively dispute that "civil rights and war do not mix". Mr. King states that it does mix because "America would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued to draw men and skills and money like some demonic suction tube". King feels as if all our money is going to waste over a war when we should be fixing the problems in the country we live in. The article also non effectively dispute that Martin King used language that was too "antagonizing". The newspaper stated " ... Dr. King can only antagonize opinions in this country instead of winning recruits to the peace movement by recklessly comparing American military methods to those of the Nazis testing 'new medicine and new tortures in the concentration camps in Europe'. The facts are harsh, but they do not justify such slander". Mr. King had to use "antagonizing opinions" to actually grasp the people of the church's (the setting where the speech was presented) attention as well as to get his point across. The reaction from the audience would not have been as effective to the emotions if he had used unantagonizing…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mr. King’s speech is about the fight for justice and equality. In Mr. King’s speech he talks about the signing of the emancipation proclamation 100 years ago and how the Negro is still not free. In his speech Dr. King repeats the phrase “100 years later” to list the difficulties of the Negro. In King’s speech he also talks about how we should change and how we should keep moving forward and not turn back. In the last parts of King’s speech he talks about his dreams for the world. King says that he has dreams that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.” King wanted there to be equality amongst everybody.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another way to have more equality and unity in this world is having confidence to stick up what they believe in. In King’s letter he mentioned, "One day the South will know that when these disinherited children of God sat down at lunch counters, they were in reality standing up for what is best in the American dream and for the most sacred values in our Judaeo Christian heritage, thereby bringing our nation back to those great wells of democracy which were dug deep by the founding fathers in their formulation of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence" (King 278). King is insisting that people must fight for what they believe in and truly depict the struggle to achieve equal human rights. King also mentioned that, "We know through painful experiences that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor, it must be demanded by the oppressed" (King 292). Basically, King is saying that the difficult challenges in our all brought within us and that people creates their own future. Although both Obama’s and King’s used very powerful and intellectual words to encourage people that the world can be a better place. I believe that Obama’s words are more…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Army where that is the job of the solider, to do what they are told which is how wars are won. I feel like Thoreau contradicts himself when saying that people must do what justice requires, regardless of cost. What justice requires for a nation is often times war, which Thoreau is vehemently against. Despite Thoreau’s opinion of the government he knows that it is necessary for their to be a government, because he goes on to say that the government should be obeyed in order to preserve the services we enjoy. It seems that Thoreau is like many Americans today who have their candid opinion but have no real suggestions that provide a viable option to what they are opposing. Thoreau was thrown in jail for not paying taxes, yet he wants to enjoy the services that the government has to offer. I feel like this is something that is dealt with today in terms of the wars that are fought. There are many people who were against the war in Iraq, yet these same people are the ones who expect the government to protect them at all costs. These people would never join the military but are the first ones to criticize the way military operations are being…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The purpose of both Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” and Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is to talk about the injustice law in the society. Thoreau explains how the government is run by the majority “because they are physically the strongest” (941). Thoreau believes a society “in which the majority rule in all cases cannot be based on justice” (941). Thoreau suggests to the audience that it is necessary to “resist” the injustice “for the most part” (942). Similarly, King states that “one has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws,” and that “conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws” (265). Through non-violence protest, both Thoreau and King are encouraging their audience to take the duty of civil…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Civil Disobedience, Thoreau expresses a need for resistance of authority. Thoreau genuinely believes that if one does not stand up to an authority figure whom they disagree with, nothing will change for the better. In Civil Disobedience, Thoreau states, “I was not designed to be forced.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “You cannot hear the name Martin Luther King, Jr., and not think of death. You might hear the words “I have a dream,” but they will doubtlessly only serve to underscore an image of a simple motel balcony, a large man made small, a pool of blood. For as famous as he may have been in life it is, and was, death that ultimately defined him. Born into a people whose main solace was Christianity's Promise Land awaiting them after the suffering of this world, King took on the power of his race’s presumed destiny and found in himself the defiance necessary to spark change. He ate, drank, and slept death. He danced with it, he preached it, he feared it, and he stared it down. He looked for ways to lay it aside, this burden of his own mortality, but…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Martin Luther King, Jr. started his movement for equal rights he had a choice. He could lead a violent revolution of the people or lead the peaceful movement of equality. Mr. King decided to lead the peaceful movement and gave his I have a Dream speech. His words captured the hearts of a nation. His words held such meaning and power people had no choice but to listen. His words changed history forever. Mr. King’s speech is a perfect example of words being more powerful than action. If he had decided to take the capital by storm and rioting it would have had a complete opposite effect on the world. Sitting down and talking is almost always the better path.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays