Dr. Robin Ganzert's Zoos Are Not Prisons

In the Times article “Zoos Are Not Prisons”. They Improve the Lives of Animals”, Dr. Robin Ganzert argues that zoos are not prisons but rather essential homes that improve the lives and welfare of animals. Ganzert claims modern zoos are far from harmful; instead, they are designed to conserve and shelter animals while combating the extinction of endangered species. The author's perspective on whether zoos are habitable for animals is valid because Ganzert addresses the criticism zoos face and strengthens the argument for the necessity of zoos by voicing their utility. Additionally, UTA students may find Ganzert's argument relevant, given the proximity of the Fort Worth and Dallas Zoos, which serve as local reference points. Furthermore, as
This argument provides a logical appeal, as almost all modern zoos offer many accessible opportunities to learn about wildlife through methods such as signs, professional speakers, and direct observation. UTA students' educational interests may align with the respect zoos give to the animals, potentially building connections with readers who value animals in a way. However, the lack of specific evidence creates a sense of generality with this claim. This rationale can be strengthened with specific examples of the educational programs they mentioned, or potential data centered around zoos' impact on public awareness. Despite Ganzert’s lack of concrete data and evidence, this point is still valid because the focus on education logically sustains the overall claim. Finally, the author's last claim argues that zoos maintain the highest standards for the welfare of animals, providing them with biodiverse and rich habitats. This point is Ganzert’s most appealing argument because it addresses the common misconceptions and criticism zoos face: that they do not align with the mental and physical needs animals
The focus on animal welfare appeals to the audience's emotions and can persuade them to see zoos the same way Ganzert does. Although the emotional appeal Ganzert attempts to gain can be interpreted differently with differing value systems, the emphasis on animal protection, species conservation, and care develops a stronger persuasiveness by appealing to Shorthorn readers’ compassion, creating a convincing reasoning for the Shorthorn. The author mentions and addresses a major counterargument by acknowledging the criticism zoos face because of the misconception that they are restrictive and “prison” like animals. The perspective Ganzert provides suggests zoos limit the freedom of animals, leading to solitude. To counter this argument, the author mentions modern zoo practices designed to improve the physical and mental health of the animals. Ganzert highlights the common practice of having all-day veterinary care, and the enriching environment modern zoos stimulate. Although the author acknowledges the validity of the criticisms faced, Ganzert argues that modern practices in zoos counteract the previous stigma held against