Second Analytical Essay on Drama
Professor Campbell
Jacqueline Klypchak
10/25/2013
The most definitive moment in the play is when Nora reveals to Mrs.Linde what she did in order to save her husband. The reader will be thoroughly surprised as to what Nora’s revelation is and how it affects her and the other characters in the play. Nora felt it was “…. necessary that he not know! My goodness can’t you understand that? It was necessary he have no idea how sick he was. The doctors came to me and said his life was in danger and the only thing that could save him was to live in the south.” (Ibsen, 2011, Act 3, p. 590) Nora seen forging her father’s signature for a loan because woman were not permitted to get loans was necessary because the doctors told her that her husband would die if they did not go where it was warmer.
Nora revealing her forging her father’s name in order to take out the loan and the things she has done in order to try and pay back the loan without having to reveal to her husband what she did shows that she is resourceful. That she is not just a frivolous spoiled rich woman who has a husband that caters to her every whim. Her willingness to not buy anything expensive and new for herself shows that she is capable of not putting her desires ahead of what is necessary in life.
Nora is proud of what she has done and shows no remorse whatsoever for going against the law and obtaining a loan in her father’s name until Mr. Krogstad come to talk to her husband. Then her whole demeanor seems to change from almost boastful to slightly timid and a little pleading when she interacts with him. She notices that Mrs.Linde appears to be attracted to and have a vested interest in Krogstad. Had Nora not made the revelation of what she had done then when Krogstad came in the tension would not have been as obvious. Her revealing to Mrs. Linde that her life was not as it seemed and she fraudulently obtained a loan that her husband was unaware of because she out right lied to his face about where she obtained the money shows that some women even in those times were not actually afraid of their husband and knew how to spin things to benefit themselves.
Nora was only afraid of Mr. Krogstad because he possessed knowledge that could be damaging to her relationship with her husband. After Nora’s revelation showed her depth because it allowed the reader to see that she was more than she appeared in the beginning of the play. The way Nora held onto her secret until she felt that no one respected her and treated her as an adult and everyone believed that she was silly and carefree. The speech makes the play seem like it is meant to show that people are not only skin deep and just because someone is portrayed one way doesn’t meant that there is not more to them than appears
Nora’s speech acted as a bridge for the character of Krogstad to exist because without her speech no one would have known about the loan and therefore there would be no way to introduce the character of Krogstad, so that he could black mail Nora into assisting him with keeping his job and ultimately change his mind after realizing how important Mrs. Linde really is to him. Without his threat of blackmail Nora would probably have just kept her mouth shut continued to make her payments and her husband would never have been aware of her misdoings. The threat of black mail is what opened Nora’s eyes as to the type of man she was married to and that she was unhappy and almost methodically going through the motions of being his wife and a mother to his children. In conclusion had Nora not made her speech the play would not have flowed as well or made as much sense as it did.
References
Ibsen, H. (2011). A doll’s house. In D.L. Pike and A.M. Acosta (Eds.) Literature: A world of writing stories, poems, plays, and essays [Vital Source digital version] (pp. 555-589). Boston, MA: Pearson Learning Solutions.
References: Ibsen, H. (2011). A doll’s house. In D.L. Pike and A.M. Acosta (Eds.) Literature: A world of writing stories, poems, plays, and essays [Vital Source digital version] (pp. 555-589). Boston, MA: Pearson Learning Solutions.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
What is Helmer’s reaction to the truth about Nora’s misdeed? Why does he blame Nora’s father?…
- 578 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Nora is in an interesting relationship with her husband Torvald. When readers first get an image of how their relationship is, it would not seem that bad. Once further into the play you see that it is just because Nora is submissive, and lets it be that way. The only reason she is loving her husband is because that is what she thinks she is supposed to do. Her husband will not let her expand as a person, and she just lets it happen. Women are constantly treated as a lower class among men. Nora is just as capable as her husband Torvald, with all of the talents that could lead her into being an important or meaningful person to society just like her Husband. Throughout the play Torvald says over and over again that his wife cannot possible understand…
- 582 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Nora's epiphany occurs when the truth is finally revealed. As Torvald unleashes his revulsion against Nora and her crime of forgery, the protagonist realizes that her husband is not who she thought he was at all. Torvald has no intention of taking the blame for Nora's crime. She thought for certain that he would selflessly give up everything for her, like she given up so much for him. When he fails to do this, she accepts the fact that their marriage has been an illusion. In this moment Nora’s eyes and mind finally become clear of any delusions she once possessed. Nora was dominated and controlled by her father before marriage and afterwards it was her husband dominating her. Torvald never treated her as an equal. She had existed for her husband and she had always expected that her husband would come to her aid when she was in trouble. She had been waiting for miracles to happen. Nora feared that Krogstad would expose everything and that their family would come undone. Contrary to her expectation, Torvald behaved like a hypocrite concerned more with societies idea of morality and a notion of social prestige, not with his wife's welfare and care. He came out in his true colors. Nora realized that her husband didn't see her as an individual. She wanted to dissolve her ties with him by abandoning him and the children. She thought her duty toward herself was above her duty as a…
- 886 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Cited: Ibsen, Henrik. “A Doll’s House”. Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing. Eds. X.J. Kennedy and Dana Gioia, 12th Ed. New Jersey: Pearson, 2013. 1598-1650. Print.…
- 834 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
At the start of the play, Nora is seen as a caring mother and wife; however, this is an affectation of joy and contentment. In reality, her true character is held enslaved by her tyrannical husband. Her demeaning nicknames, “skylark” and “little song bird” truly are a metaphor for her mental and physical imprisonment to the societal roles of being a mother and wife. Nora accepts this captivity, however, evident through her own use of her nicknames throughout the story in order to pry money from her husband and follow all of his commands. At this point, the audience begins to sense superficiality and materialistic behavior from Nora, but this view soon changes as Ibsen reveals his realistic writing style. Deceit is first seen as she consumes macaroons secretively, in spite of her husband’s disapproval. She begins to reassure to Torvald that she, “should not think of going against (his) wishes’,”(Ibsen,1.4) and is dishonest once again when telling him Chritine Linde and Dr. Rank brought her the desserts. This fraudulence continues as she searches for a way to hastily pay a debt which her financially independent husband is unaware of. She hides the truth from her husband in the same manner she participates in a game of “hide-and-seek” with her…
- 2454 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
People are capable of doing crazy things! Nora, in Henrik Ibsen’s A Doll’s House, loved her husband so much that she committed forgery just for the sake of his wellbeing. Susan Glaspell’s character in Trifles, Mrs. Wright, murders her husband after she discovers that he killed the one most precious thing to her, her pet bird. It was out of love that these women committed illegal crimes. Nora wanted her husband to be healthy because she loved him and knew that without his salary coming in, their home would fall apart. In contrast, Mrs. Wright wanted her husband dead. He was responsible for taking the life of the only company she had for many years. Mrs. Wright loved her pet bird more than she loved her own husband. The bird was more than just a pet to this lonely woman, it was her single companion. Through their failed marriages, conviction of crime and judgment from their peers, these character’s personalities change completely and begin to show the reader the evolution of women’s place in society.…
- 1471 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
As the novella unfolds, the author reveals various characteristics that the protagonist simply cannot achieve due to her physicality and ethics. For example, many female characters show the desire for security in their lives as seen when Irene admits that “security was the most important and desired thing in life” (76). Both Clare Kendry and Irene…
- 510 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Her life was ruled and controlled by her husband Torvald. Her husband especially did not respect or treat Nora with equality. Nora spent eight years of her life with Torvald, and that is where she had made a huge mistake. Nora found out her husband’s true colours when it was too late, if she had found out who her husband really was and how the love he was showing to Nora was nothing but false she could have left her husband before the eight years and lived her life with freedom. Nora can find someone that actually treats her with respects, equality, and with…
- 449 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Cited: Ibsen, Henrik. A Dollhouse. Literature an Introduction of Reading and Writing. ED. Vivian Garcia. 5th ed. Boston: Pearson Education, 2012. 1201-222. Print.…
- 1555 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
The exposition is setup in Act 1 where the characters are introduced and Nora getting a loan to help with his illness that he is not aware of. The inciting incident is when Torvald talks of becoming the bank president and the raise he will receive has Nora thinking she will be able to pay the loan off early. The rising action starts when Korgstad tries to blackmail Nora to help him keep his job at the bank by saying he would not let her husband know about the loan she had if she would help him to keep his job. When this does not work, Korgstad writes a letter to Torvald to explain to him about Nora's loan. Mrs. Linde tells Nora she should tell her husband about the note before he finds out some other way. Korgstad drops the letter in the mailbox and Nora tries to keep Torvald from reading it. The climax is when Torvald reads the letter, becomes outraged at Nora and tells her how she has ruin his life and reputation and she is just like her father. The maid brings another note addressed to Nora from Krogstad and Torvald reads this and sees that he has dropped the note so she would not have to worry about repaying the rest of it. Torvald ask for Nora's forgiveness but it is too late and she is going to leave him. She told him that he never loved her and after what he said, she did not love him either. She tells him she must find herself and become independent because she had been sheltered all her life by her father and Torvald. She walks out the door and never looks…
- 290 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
I agree with Nora’s decision to abandon her husband and children, she didn’t do it out of selfishness but more of a sacrifice. Nora loved her husband and children very much, but she felt she needed her freedom and independence. Nora didn’t want her children to be like her, she thought by her being immorality that it will pass down to her children, like it passed down to her from her father. Also, Nora realized she had a lot of growing up to do, because she acted like a child more than an adult. She was too dependent on her husband, so she wasn’t independent as a women and wasn’t capable of doing things on her on. Nora husband treated her like a play toy, more than a wife. I think by Nora leaving was a selfless thing to do, because she wanted…
- 193 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
* This chapter was written in Italics because it was written from a different point of view which was Ruth’s perspective who talks about her past as a child.…
- 7118 Words
- 29 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In “Othello” and “A Doll House”, the two plays resulted in destruction of two families due to one’s jealousy and revenge. The antagonist in “Othello” is Iago who served as Othello ancient in the play was against him from the start. Iago had several motives for plotting against Othello, because they did not give him the rank of Lieutenant and he did not approve of the marriage between Othello and Desdemona. In “A Doll House”, Krogstad was an employee of Mr. Helmer and he knew that he was going to lose his job. These two characters had motives, which resulted in them to develop plots that were not similar, but they both had the same life-altering outcome and were successful.…
- 777 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Ibsen, Henrik. “A Doll’s House”. Literature and Ourselves: A Thematic Introduction for Readers and Writers. 6th ed. Ed. Gloria Mason Henderson, Anna Dunlap Higgins, Bill Day, and Sandra Stevenson Waller. New York: ABLongman, 2009. Print.…
- 1908 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
Nora’s final walk out from the house seems to be a selfish woman, but it was the example of power and strength of struggle women. Nora wasn’t agreed to live life with Torvalds’s condition. She argue that, “I believe that before all else, I’m a human being, no less than you-or anyway, I ought to try to become one (Ibsen 840).” Here, Ibsen clearly expresses the independent nature of women. Nora believes that women had a right to develop their own individuality, but in reality her role has been often self-sacrificial. She always been treated as a narrow house wife by Torvalds. She shows her eagerness, “you thought it fun to be in love with me, that’s all (Ibsen 838).”Her biggest discovery was to save her husband’s life, but she disappointed when it became an unforgivable crime in the eyes of her husband and society. At the last, she left her husband and children was begets action in her life as a feminist. The whole play based on the beginning of feminism in 19th centuries. Nora who always thought that she was nothing else than the entertainment of her husband transcend her into a independent woman was the most dramatic change on the…
- 735 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays