Preview

Drones: Barack Obama and U.s. Senator Lindsey

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
582 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Drones: Barack Obama and U.s. Senator Lindsey
DRONES There is a fierce debate about drones being used on U.S. citizens. Drones are a unmanned aerial vehicle that can armed. It is very important to understand that drone use has horrific consequences abroad, and at home. With the main stream news coverage leaning to the left, by the lack of, or not reporting on the issue altogether. I want to give a conservative view on this issue which will eventually effect everyone in the U.S. Drones are widely used against targets in Muslim countries, as in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Yemen. These drones have killed nearly 5000 people in these countries. Washington claims that the drones target militants, but a large number of civilians have been killed. UN officials admitted on March 12, 2013 that strikes launched by unmanned US drone aircraft in Pakistan over the objections of the country’s government violate international law. U.S. senator Lindsey Graham recently said "Washington is at war and the drones take out some targets" Graham goes on to say "it's a weapon that needs to be used. It's a tactical weapon". It seems to me that drone use in warfare is like a game, clean, and with no risk. Without the fear, pain, and discomfort of combat on the ground you lose site of the cost of war, though blood and lives on all sides. who's to say that it is limited to just the U.S. to use drones, once others have drone technology. I think it could turn into a competition to see how many civilians can one take out. There is a struggle against the use of drones on U.S. citizens at home and overseas. Eric Holder's March 4 letter was disclose by Sen. Rand Paul, who had asked "whether the Justice Department believed President Barack Obama had the legal right to order a targeted strike against an American citizen located inside the United States". In the FAA reauthorization act, section 332 the Federal Aviation Administration was ordered to develop regulations for testing and licensing of commercial drones buy 2015. By February of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    On September 11, 2001, everything changed. Terrorism had never been seen on such a massive scale. As a result of the massive attacks on U.S. soil, changes had to be enacted. The fight against terror was now a global war effort. The War on Terror was not a popular choice, but it no one expected it to go on for this long. It is now being fought by technology, which led to the drones being used against U.S. citizens suspected of terrorism. The president can authorize these strikes with the claim that these citizens pose an imminent danger to the security of the United States. However, the Obama administration’s definition of imminent threat is vague and without oversight or any checks and balances. There are various military, governmental, and ethical concerns regarding the use of drone strikes ordered by the president. The use of drones is valid, but the administration has not presented any valid defense of their tactics, which paints a poor picture of Oval Office tactical policy.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    CIA drone strikes have the potential to decimate terrorist organizations in an inexpensive manner and reduces boots on the ground combat for American soldiers. Though, we need expansive and additional congressional oversight of drone strikes and CIA targeting. The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) is devoted to regulating and reviewing every aspect of the drone program, however, committee members are often met with denial and restriction of information. We need to make sure our drone program is met with regulation and preemptive strikes must be strictly reviewed in a legal manner prior to, in order to prevent the endangerment of innocent civilians, radicalization and mobilization of extremest retaliation, and to preserve the reputation…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It has been estimated that by 2020, the United States will have spent at bare minimum, $39.6 billion on drones. Most people have been plagued by the mindset that because it is only a fraction of air and ground weaponry, much less anyway, America is definitely making progress. “Drones are an excellent refinement……They’re a marked departure from the 20th century game of delivering destruction on a wide scale: whereas a bomber-wing nuclear-submarine or aircraft-carrier battle group costs billions, puts hundreds of…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just because we have the technological power to use drones to take people/things out, that does not necessarily mean that we should. The main concern being brought up, that while we as a nation may have always killed people with a certain form of ease in the name of war, it has come at a high cost. It is expensive, and not too easy. However, with this drone system it is easier, less expensive, and does not require so much blood shed. This is an area of concern because this may become us as a nation to become much more relaxed when it comes to moral…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Warfare, enacted by George Bush and expanded on by President Obama to provide a haven for Americans against the terrorist group, al-Qaeda. The use of weaponized unmanned surveillance drones allowed for far better independent targeting decisions, rather than retrieving intelligence from sources within the real country where the warfare would take place. These strategic implications created a question among Americans, is the use of drones to target individuals right? This question has arisen due to a high number of civilian casualties, making it seem inhumane to do. However, Kenneth Anderson provides readers a strong argument as to why drone warfare is strategically effective in his article, “The Case for Drones” with his organization pattern,…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When we're using drones, we're putting a meaningless drone's life at risk rather than a soldier's. Drones are just helpful technology that have no psychology connections to the world. Meanwhile, soldiers are humans with bonds to friends and family. A soldier dying and losing his connection to the world would have much more of an impact than a technological tool. If a drone were to get shot while entering a country to spy, we would just find a new drone. But if a soldier were to do the same, there would be a massive impact to the people the soldier had interacted with. Meaning drones are irrelevant to the…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On September 16, 2005, the FAA issued guidelines on the domestic use of drones. The FAA then released a policy document concerning the operation of drone aircraft on February 13, 2007. Between the two documents, the requirements to institute the use of drone aircraft in the United States are made clear. These requirements were further elaborated on in a fact sheet on December 1, 2010.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jones Dbq Analysis

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The American society in which we grew up is one that prides itself on the advancements we continuously make in the technological field. Though there is some value in the use of devices to aid our lazy American culture, the sacrifices of opening our skies to the new drone age greatly outweighs the benefits of making life easier than it already is. While many companies shift to now offer drone delivery right to our doorsteps, the administrators in charge are not paying attention to the laundry list of determinants that can result from our growing reliance and dependence on something which stands as a want as opposed to a necessity. Drones should not be regarded as the top technological success…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They soar overhead collect intel and are capable of destroying a whole city! Drones often fly in the sky and you don't even notice them because they seem like regular airplanes,but they are capable of much more than just flying around.These Unmanned Aerial Vehicles spy on you daily. Drones should be illegal because they kill innocent humans, promote terrorism, and are expensive to maintain.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drones In Warfare Essay

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should drones be used in warfare? It’s necessary to learn about drones—what they are, and how they are used—before determining the answer. The Air Force calls them Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, or simply UVAs. There are dozens of them flying over countries like Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq, providing intelligence and surveillance. Since September 11, 2001, the US has been fighting the “War on Terror”, in which drones are used to kill suspected terrorists. Drones have changed the pattern of warfare and military outcomes.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Home Analysis

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drones are capable of being used by terrorists and other criminals for their bad intentions. For example, in the article “Drone Home” on page 7, Lev Grossman points out the possible security concerns revolving the domestic use of drones.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Habeas Corpus

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Balko, R. (2012). U.s. drone policy: Standing near terrorists makes you a terrorist. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/29/drone-attacks-innocent-civilians_n_1554380.html…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drones are starting to appear everywhere in today’s society, whether it be for commercial use or governmental use. Having this new found technology leads to the matter of the limitations of the usage of a drone, as in air safety, privacy of the people, and security. The consensus says that drones are for the better because of their diverseness and mobility. Although the argument has been made that drones will lead to a less private lifestyle and that the government will be able to track citizens and watch their every move. Drones should be sold to the public but regulated by the government because they are extremely mobile and they are reliable.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 and various other terrorist threats, the United States has used unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), or drones, to eliminate terrorists or potential terrorists. The US should continue using and developing drones as combat weapons because they have less collateral damage than impractical alternatives, keep our own troops safe, and aide military generals with photography and mapping of foreign countries. Moreover, because UAV's cannot guarantee the safety of the innocent bystanders, drones obtain the reputation of creating more terrorists than they tend to eliminate and not only do drone strikes violate the sovereignty in other countries, they also violate the rights of basic human rights. Consequently, drones may be perceived differently in the eyes of Americans and Pakistanis.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Usage in America

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Drone use within the United Stated of America has been a very controversial topic of the recent times; therefore, this article is being written to say why drone usage has become so controversial in our country, and all over the world.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays