Tracy Brown
Kaplan University
Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients
When considering effective ways to cut government spending, each state should start requiring mandatory drug testing among all its welfare recipients. Cutting welfare benefits to known drug abusers will allow benefits to be doled out more effectively and efficiently to those Americans that are truly in need, diminish drug use in those poverty stricken communities that tend to rely on welfare assistance and take a chunk from the government’s out of control spending.
I think that this is an effective thesis statement because it clearly outlines my paper and it states what side of this discussion I have chosen to represent. It is stated clear, concise, and to the point.
Because mandatory drug testing for welfare recipients is an issue that is not in full effect, it may be difficult to find opinions from “reliable” sources concerning such legislation. It may also be difficult to determine long term effects of such a program like cuts in spending and reductions in drug abuse.
I will be researching government websites both nationally and locally. I would also like to contact local government representatives to perhaps get an opinion about the idea of said legislation. In addition, because this is such a new topic, there are many newspapers to research that will have the latest on states that want to begin developing the idea of mandatory drug testing.
It will be difficult to avoid logical fallicies on this topic. Because I am coming down on one side of this discussion and want to persuade my audience, I will want to use comments and information from those that view it as I do. Using statistics that are deemed factual will help in showing that these are not just biased opinions from politicians that are simply looking for another vote.
If I were to begin to persuade a city council meeting or write a letter to my local government representatives about the importance of mandatory drug testing for welfare recipients, I would begin by saying: Welfare is not an entitlement! It was never intended to be as such. When President Roosevelt enacted the Social Security Act in 1935, it was during the great depression, when 25% of Americans were unemployed. Since then welfare has generously extended its hand to millions of Americans (2012). When someone is benefitting from these programs, and is not deemed disabled, it should be viewed as a “hand up” not a “hand out”. It is an issue all over the country that welfare is being abused by its benefactors. Cards are being used for ATM withdrawals, to purchase liquor, buying cigarettes, and even gambling in casinos. Food stamps are being openly traded for drugs (Camden, 2011). Not to mention the deception that is occurring about how many dependents a recipient is responsible for. To be subjected to a simple urine test to receive money and benefits from the U.S, government is not too much to bear. It is no different than obliging to mandatory drug testing for a job. Florida state governor Rick Scott has stated that in his state alone they will save 9 million dollars a year because of benefits being cut due to mandatory drug testing. With these kinds of cuts in spending nationwide, it is sure to reduce government spending a great deal. Not to mention the effect it will have on drug abusers. Florida state governor Rick Scott has implemented drug counseling on a volunteer basis for those benefactors that test positive (Delaney, 2011). Cuts in spending, responsible distribution of benefits and reductions in drug abuse, this sounds like a win-win scenario for us all.
References
Author Unknown, (2012), The History of Welfare, Retrieved from: http://www.welfareinfo.org/history/
Delaney, A., (2011, November 27). Rick Scott Backs Drug Tests for Welfare Beneficiaries, Public Worker, and Himself, Retrieved from: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/27drug-testing-welfare-_n_983235-.html/
Camden, J., (2011, February 04). The Spokesman-Review, Abuse of Welfare Electronic Benefits Transfer Cards Targeted, Retrieved from: http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2011/feb/04/abuse-of-welfare-electronic-benefits-transfer/
References: Author Unknown, (2012), The History of Welfare, Retrieved from: http://www.welfareinfo.org/history/ Delaney, A., (2011, November 27). Rick Scott Backs Drug Tests for Welfare Beneficiaries, Public Worker, and Himself, Retrieved from: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/27drug-testing-welfare-_n_983235-.html/ Camden, J., (2011, February 04). The Spokesman-Review, Abuse of Welfare Electronic Benefits Transfer Cards Targeted, Retrieved from: http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2011/feb/04/abuse-of-welfare-electronic-benefits-transfer/
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Ok, let's all look at this as realistically as we can; if just 1 person failed a drug test for the welfare, that's a whole extra few hundred dollars per month that our government can save, and that's only for 1 person! A typical drug test cost around $10 for the cheaper ones. That's store price too, that's not considering what government contracter bulk…
- 501 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Florida Governor Rick Scott made plans to test all welfare recipients to see if they are using drugs before they can receive payments is hardly saving the state any money, according to recent reports. At $30 per test, the state paid $28,800 in drug test reimbursements (960 reimbursements at $30 each, since about 2 percent also didn’t finish the application process) for those who did pass, while saving themselves about $66,000 in payments that did not have to be made for the year to those applicants that didn’t make it through for one reason or another (applicants receive $138 a month, or $1,656 per year).…
- 493 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
As of today, it is mandatory for all states within the US to implement and sustain comparable regulations for any recipients and applicants that apply for welfare in efforts to reduce welfare assistance fraud. Welfare fraud correlates directly with the financial…
- 498 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
There is much debate regarding this issue. Supporters of requiring drug tests for welfare applicants believe that there will be many people deterred from applying due to knowing they will not pass. They also believe that some will fail the drug tests. These supporters believe this number of people will be so large that there will be a significant decrease in welfare spending. Other supporters have said “substance abuse is a prominent barrier preventing people from making the necessary transition from governmental dependence to self-reliance.”(Targeted News Service) Opponents have said this is a direct violation of our constitutional rights as American citizens. Some have even said it is not right to assume that just because people are poor, they drug users. Other opposers of welfare drug testing have argued that it will not save money at…
- 1822 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
We can also look at some of the views of people who are entirely opposed to the idea of drug testing welfare recipients. In 1999 Michigan ran a pilot program to drug test welfare recipients and was sued by the American Civil Liberties Union claiming that constitutional rights were violated because testing was done without “individualized suspicion.” Many other state such as Florida, Virginia, Ohio have all attempted to pass these bills but to no avail because already two months into this…
- 580 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
A Woman working at a convenience store in the US had a man walk in with an EBT card (Food Stamp Credit Card or something similar) and he wanted to buy cigarettes. The woman refused and the man left. The next day the man came in again with a member of his family and raised a commotion about it. The owner came in, sold the man cigarettes and fired the woman. Some people might say that it is unconstitutional to demand a mandatory drug test in order to receive welfare, and it will deny them their human rights. Receiving welfare is a privilege not a right. Recipients should be drug tested in order to collect welfare.…
- 553 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Coolican, J. P. "OPINION: If Goal is Recovery, Why Stop Drug Testing at Welfare Recipients?" McClatchy - Tribune Business News Feb 08 2013. Ox Research; ProQuest Central; ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source. Web. 11 Feb. 2013.…
- 1800 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
All over the United States Americans are using government assistance money to buy drugs. It has become a major issue in the past years. Americans have figured out how to abuse the system. They are taking the governments money and are fueling their drug addictions. In order to fix this states across the United States have already started drug testing their applicant's. Some states disagree because they believe it is stereotyping government assistance applicants. Even though many jobs also require drug test. Americans in the United States who need financial assistance from the government, should be subjected to a monthly drug test.…
- 969 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The world we live in today is in a widespread drug epidemic. Welfare is a big discussion being brought to the table in many states, a lot of testing is being done to find out the real pros and cons deterring welfare recipients. Reaching out to the public teen to young adult age, there are many positive and negative aspects to creating this law in every state. States that conduct welfare drug testing combine paper questionnaires with physical drug testing. Many of the news articles that have been written about welfare drug testing have cited extremely low rates of positive test results as evidence showing the ineffectiveness of drug testing programs. There are numerous ways applicants can game the system. The main premise behind drug testing…
- 636 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Firstly, drug testing would decrease the amount of people abusing the system. People who are drug users and refuse to stop or get help will not apply for welfare. Also, drug testing would send a message to society that abusing the system will no longer be tolerated and it would free up extra funds for families who actually need the help. Thus, drug testing welfare recipients would stop people who are abusing of the system.…
- 444 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Right now only 3 out of the 50 states require drug testing to qualify for benefits. There are 23 other states that are seeking to adopt this same requirement (Alcindor). Of the three states that currently require testing, Florida is the only state that has practiced this for every applicant. As a result of the legislation that took effect of July 1st, people seeking welfare benefits in the state of Florida will have to submit urine, blood, or hair samples to be tested for the use of illicit substances, and pay for the testing (Kondro E721). If the applicant tests negative, then they will be reimbursed for the cost of the drug test. If they test positive, then they are prohibited from receiving benefits for six months. The only way that they can reapply during that six month period is if they can document successful completion of a substance abuse treatment program that meets state criteria. If the legislation passes, then the 23 other states will follow through this policy as well.…
- 545 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In today’s America, government aid is highly depended on. The US government has spent $498 billion dollars this year on welfare alone. The state of Tennessee has an average of 250,000 residents on welfare and has $3 billion dollars this year alone. To help cut costs and help tax payers, 36 states, including Tennessee, have proposed a bill to drug test all welfare recipients. Since the beginning of the year, the welfare rate has jumped 7 percent while at the same time, the welfare funds are drying up. Tennessee funds have dropped 17.5 percent, which comes out to be about $215.3 million dollars this year. State lawmakers have proposed that if drug users on welfare are stopped, they can save a total of $77 million dollars a year, but to stop them they must start the testing now, which will cost the state more money. It would cost $2.3 million dollars a year to test a quarter of the adults receiving aid this year, then $3.8 million to test another 25 percent the following year, and $2.4 million to continue testing the entire population each year thereafter.…
- 1385 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
There are approximately 30 million Americans on some sort of welfare right now. In 2010, the United States Federal Government spent $0.8 trillion toward welfare. The amount spent on welfare in 2010 is one of the top expenses, money spent on defense and healthcare were the highest expenses, but welfare was third (Chantrill, Christopher). The main purpose of an economic welfare system is to assist citizens who are not able to support themselves or their families due to unemployment, underemployment, hardship, unskilled labor capacity, disability, or other similar reasons. So why are there some many Americans that solely rely on welfare benefits? Welfare recipients should be drug tested. Testing for drugs among welfare recipients would save the US Government millions of dollars, it would help many Americans overcome their illegal drug habits, and taxpayer’s money would not support somebody’s illegal drug use.…
- 879 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
As a result of mandatory drug testing for TANF and SNAP recipients it will not only resolve the cases who abuse the benefits it will help the families and the people who need it more then to just fill a drug problem. Of course saying a recipient is using the benefits to buy drugs is stereotypical, but that’s where mandatory/random drug testing is a good thing. Parents who work two jobs who have to choose to either pay the utility bill or buy food is who need these programs the most. Not the ones who get this “free ride” for having kids and not wanting to provide for them from the…
- 469 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
A. David Vitter of U.S. News Weekly states, by drug testing welfare recipients, it would ensure that all hardworking taxpayers’ money I 'd going to get used in the correct and intended way. The nation is already in enough debt of more than $14 trillion, does it make much sense to be wasting tax money on illegal drugs and dishonest welfare recipients? That makes no sense at all! (Vitter, 2011)…
- 898 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays