Drunker Theory

The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/0025-1747.htm MD
48,4

Drucker’s theory of the business and organisations: challenging business assumptions

500

Pat Daly
Shannon Development Co., Shannon, Ireland, and University College Cork,
Cork, Ireland, and

James S. Walsh
University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
Abstract
Purpose – This paper considers Drucker’s “theory of the business” as a management concept applicable to the challenging of firm performance. The paper seeks to do this by using the theoretical framework developed by Drucker as a tool to apply to organisation planning. In addition the paper aims to demonstrate the often “silent” but influential role assumptions have on organisations. Thus, the paper seeks to invite a reassessment of the role assumptions play in organisations and to present a new and topical perspective on Drucker’s original “theory of the business” argument.
Design/methodology/ approach – A close review of Drucker’s “theory of the business” article is outlined and a range of recently published (1994-2008) works on related subject matter is reviewed. It is argued that the “assumptive design framework” at the heart of the theory of the business has potential to act as a powerful planning and strategy tool for enterprises. In addition the review demonstrates the “silent” positive and negative influences business assumptions have on organisation and management practice.
Findings – As a general review the paper provides new knowledge about the practical potential of one of Peter Drucker’s seminal published articles in an area largely untouched by business or management research. It illustrates how research employing Drucker’s “theory of the business” concept in the context of assumptions in business can have major benefit for organisations, especially growth-oriented businesses.
Originality/value – This is the first paper to address the empirical potential

References: Abrahamson, E. (2004), Change without Pain: How Managers can Overcome Initiative Overload, Organisation Chaos and Employee Burnout, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. Argyris, C. (1999), On Organisation Learning, Blackwell Publishing, London. Argyris, C. and Schon, D.A. (1974), Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness, Jossey-Bass, Inc., New York, NY. Christensen, C.M. (1997), “Making strategy; learning by doing”, Harvard Business Review, November/December, pp De Geus, A.P. (1988), “Planning as learning”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 66 No. 2, pp. 70-4. Dewar, J.A. (2002), Assumption-Based Planning: A Tool for Reducing Avoidable Surprise, Rand/Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Drucker, P. (1994), “Theory of the business”, Harvard Business Review, September/October, pp Fahey, L. and Randall, R.M. (1997), Learning from the Future: Competitive Foresight Scenarios, Wiley, New York, NY. Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C.K. (1989), “Strategic intent”, Harvard Business Review, May/June, pp Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C.K. (1994), Competing for the Future, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. Hammer, M. and Champy, J. (1993), Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution, 1st ed., Harper Business, New York, NY. Hofstede, G. (1994), Uncommon Sense about Organisations – Cases, Studies, and Field Observations, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. Johnson, G. and Scholes, K. (1998), Exploring Corporate Strategy, Prentice-Hall, Harlow. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1993), “Putting the balanced scorecard to work”, Harvard Business Review, September/October, pp Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1996a), “Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system”, Harvard Business Review, January/February, pp Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1996b), The Balanced Scorecard – Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (2000), “Having trouble with your strategy? Then map it”, Harvard Business Review, September/October, pp Kegan, R. and Lahey, L. (2001), How the Way We Talk Can Change the Way We Work, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. McGrath, R.G. and Macmillan, I.C. (1999), “Discovery driven planning”, Harvard Business Review on Managing Uncertainty, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, pp Magretta, J. (2002), What Management Is, The Free Press, New York, NY. Mason, R.O. and Mitroff, I.I. (1981), Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions: Theory, Cases and Techniques, Wiley, New York, NY. Ohmae, K. (1982), The Mind of The Strategist, Penguin, Harmondsworth. Pettigrew, A. (1990), “Studying strategic choice and strategig change: a comment on Mintzberg and Waters: ‘does decision get in the way?’”, Organisation Studies, Vol Schein, E.H. (1984), “Coming to a new awareness of organizational culture”, Sloan Management Review, Vol Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R., Roth, G. and Smith, B. (1999), The Dance of Change: The Challenges to Sustaining Momentum in Learning Organisations, Doubleday, New van der Heijden, K. (1996), Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation, Wiley, New York, NY. Welch, J. (co-written with Byrne, J.A.) (2001), Jack – What I’ve Learned Leading a Great Company and Great People, Headline Book Publishing, London. Whittington, R. (1993), What Is Strategy and Does it Matter?, Routledge, London. Whittington, R. (2002), “Practice perspectives on strategy: unifying and developing a field”, Best Paper Proceedings, Academy of Management, Denver, CO.