Preview

Due Process of Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
999 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Due Process of Law
Due Process of Law

In our government today we have due process of law. Due process of law simply means that we have protection against a chance deprivation of life, liberty or property. Within the due process law, if you are to be accused of something it has to be under fair and reasonable circumstances. If we are ever to be arrested of something, under due process it commands that we are taken to court and showed a cause. It is very important that we have due process in the law for the people of the United States. Law enforcement always requires the balancing of two competing social concerns: on one hand, is the government's interest in protecting its citizens and prosecuting criminal conduct; on the other hand, is the right of innocent citizens to be free from unrestricted searches and seizures and compelled confessions. Under British rule before the Revolution that established a sovereign United States, citizens were subject to unwarranted searches of their property and seizure of their persons for suspicion of criminal conduct without the need for justification on the part of government agents. This experience under British rule was incorporated into the U.S. Constitution and its subsequent amendments, including the Bill of Rights, precisely to provide the protection of citizens against unrestricted governmental police powers. Unrestricted police powers might, in principle, allow for the highest level of crime prevention and prosecution, but at a very steep cost, because virtually any police action would be permissible, including searches and apprehension, detention, and imprisonment without any justification, based solely on the suspicions, or even the whims, of government agents. Excessive protections of individual rights would prohibit the investigatory, arrest, and prosecutorial functions necessary to enforce the laws of society. The goal of modern constitutional criminal procedure is to define principles of law enforcement that protect citizens from
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Terry V. Ohio Case Study
    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Terry V. Ohio Case Study

    The Due Process clause states that the United States Federal Government must uphold the legal rights and liberties of its citizens when they are arrested or taken into custody.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Models Of Crime Deterrence Herbert Packer
    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page

    Models Of Crime Deterrence Herbert Packer

    Herbert Packer has developed two important models of crime deterrence. The first, is referred to as the crime control model, a conservative approach whereby a suspect should be detained or arrested until he or she is proven guilty (Cooper, 2014). The second is referred to as the due process model. According to the basic stipulations of this model, a suspect should be presumed as being innocent until there is adequate evidence to prove that he or she is guilty. This implies that a suspect should not be detained or arrested until the due process of determining his or her involvement in crime is completed. In view of these stipulations, it is evident that the due process model is founded on a liberal approach while the crime control model is founded…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analysis Of The Article 'Due Process' By Werhane And Radin
    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analysis Of The Article 'Due Process' By Werhane And Radin

    In Werhane and Radin’s article “Employment at Will and Due Process”, they had shown the reasons why they believe the relationship of the employer and employee should not be bound by any contract or regulations. This means that they are argued in defense of Due Process and against EAW. They stated that the principle of Employment at Will (EAW) is a common-law doctrine that stated that employers will have the rights to whatever they want to their employees and able to fire, hire and promote anyone anytime with no valid reasons, laws and contracts necessary. This is not means that the employers did not give the employees any reasons to their actions, it is that the reasons that they give have no…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Constitutional Policing: Silverthorn Lumber Vs. United States
    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Constitutional Policing: Silverthorn Lumber Vs. United States

    The police have been empowered by the government with the power to investigate and make arrests in connections to violations of law. The police must abide by the law in their pursuit to uphold law. The courts in the United States examine police, procedure and behavior, and can overturn, overrule or modify violations of law and procedure that do not adhere to due process. Examples of the courts influence on policing procedures can be found in cases such as Weeks vs. United States (1914), Silverthorn Lumber vs. United States (1920), and Mapp vs. Ohio (1961). If the issues are examined one can see the precedents the courts used to…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Because It’s Probable: Reviewing Probable Cause, Warrants, Searches, Arrests, and How They Intertwine.
    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Because It’s Probable: Reviewing Probable Cause, Warrants, Searches, Arrests, and How They Intertwine.

    The following paper discusses the use of warrants, arrests, and the searching of private residences, when the law enforcement officers involved have concluded that there is probable cause. Although, probable cause is a necessary requirement in the obtaining of a warrant and in the following through of arrest procedures, ironically, according to the Legal Information Institute at the Cornell Law School, “Neither the Fourth Amendment nor the federal statutory provisions relevant to the area define “probable cause;” the definition is entirely a judicial construct” (Cornell, 2006).…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Cja 364 Search And Failure Research Paper
    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cja 364 Search And Failure Research Paper

    The Fourth Amendment was set in place to protect society from unlawful police work. When it comes to apprehending criminals and ensuring their conviction, evidence needs to be gathered before hand. To do so, there is a lengthy process to be followed; the search and seizure method, the arrest, reasonableness, and right of privacy methods. However, there are laws that can protect officers in the line of duty or make accommodations to police work while in the line of duty. One law that helps protect police officers during the line of duty is the “stop and frisk.” However, for an arrest to take place there must be probable cause in that it must be more than likely than not that a violation of the law has been committed and the individual arrested committed the…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Due Process Clause Of The 14th Amendment
    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Due Process Clause Of The 14th Amendment

    The Due Process clause of the 14th Amendment, at least when it first began, had a procedural understanding in the Court. The Court identified the clause to protect intrusions of liberty by the States without the proper process of law (fair trial, jury of peers, etc.) The Court, in the transitional era, developed a new understanding of the Due Process clause. The question asked was no longer about the presence of the process, but about the validity of the law at its core.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona
    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Miranda Vs Arizona

    The United States has come a long way since the Constitution was created, and it has learned from the mistakes done. There has been a lot of cases where people did not have a fair trial and people has been sentenced unfairly. After serious mistakes, many bills have developed so the incident does not happen again. Unfortunately, people have to go through the worse so other people can benefit. After the case of Miranda v. Arizona, many people have benefit from it. Society as a whole has become better, and police officers now tell everyone their rights. We have come with the conclusion that everyone has the right to know their legal rights either by self-interest or because it is morally right.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Constitutional Strict Rights
    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Constitutional Strict Rights

    Criminal due process grants all people to be treated fairly and equally, especially to a citizen accused of a crime. The 5th amendment states that the federal government that cannot deprive of life, liberty, or…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Due Process Supporters
    • 2569 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Due Process Supporters

    The concern about gun control causes an uproar to many supporters of the due process system. First, many supporters argue that gun control restricts rights given to the people of the United States, by the Second Amendment (the right to bear arms). They argue, that if strong gun control laws were to be placed there would be a likely possibility for those laws to be claimed unconstitutional and a reevaluation of the law would have to occur. Second, the tense topic “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” is raised. Believers of this often insist on evaluating how gun control laws have previously affected crime rates. When data is evaluated the reality of it is, crime rates don’t go down when gun control restrictions are increased. Most believe that bad people will find other ways to get a gun. Finally, due process supporters state that by creating strict gun control laws you are restricting law abiding citizens from engaging in many activities. For many, guns are a major part of their lifestyle, for example; hunting and sport shooting. These people are abiding by all the rules and regulations, therefore by restricting them from using guns it would be useless in the prevention of crime. Thus, supporters of the due process system continue to strive to keep gun restrictions to a safe and constitutional minimum. A Due Process Supporters View on Gun Control…

    • 2569 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Due Process Under the 5th Amendment
    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Due Process Under the 5th Amendment

    Maarv, H. (2011, July 6). Can I Serve a Subpoena to Anyone if I Need Him in Court? Retrieved February 26, 2012, from ehow: http://www.ehow.com/info_8698507_can-anyone-need-him-court.html…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Does The System Work After Being Incarcerated?
    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Does The System Work After Being Incarcerated?

    “ Those who have been swept within the criminal justice system works bears little resemblance to what happens on television or in movies.” (Alexander 59). She then spoke about the fourth amendment which is individuals having the rights of the people to be secured, their papers, houses etc. The passages states, “Most Americans do not know what the Fourth Amendment of the U.S Constitution actually states or what it requires of the police… The right of the people to be secured in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or things to be seized.”…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule
    • 624 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Exclusionary Rule

    The Fourth amendment guards against unreasonable searches and seizures, along with requiring any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause. The interpretation and execution of the Fourth amendment in the courtroom however, is decided by the Supreme Court in an attempt to find a fair balance between individual and community interests. The exclusionary rule for example, is a Supreme Court precedent that holds police departments responsible for seizing incriminating information according to constitutional specifications of due process, or the information will not be allowed as evidence in a criminal trial. The question that arises in turn, is whether the exclusionary rule has handcuffed the abilities to effectively protect the community by the police, or if it has actually resulted in a positive police reform which needs to be expanded upon.…

    • 624 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Police History Policing
    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Police History Policing

    The relationship between the government and police organizations affects police practices on a daily basis and at all levels, local and national. The Federal Government sets standard that need to be followed. An example of a Federal ruling regarding policing has much to do with the Miranda Rights. A criminal named Ernesto Miranda was let free based on Supreme Court Rule. In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court overturned his conviction and ruled that police officers had to advise suspects of their right to remain silent and their right to an attorney before being interrogated (Walker Katz, 2011). Since then, the Miranda Rights have been a national standard that affect policing on a day to day basis. Conclusion…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Examples Of Due Process Violations
    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Examples Of Due Process Violations

    Central American families encounter overwhelming obstacles to due process in detention; for example, the process of expedited removal places families who are eligible for asylum at risk of deportation. Although refugees in removal proceedings have the right to legal aid, nearly 40% of all detention facilities are located 60 miles or from a metro area (Human Rights First, 2011). Because its difficult to access legal services, roughly 84% of women and children face their removal proceedings without representation (Srikantiah, Hausman, & Weissman-Ward, 2015). Although the immigration judge and opposing counsel are obligated to educate detainees on the asylum process, this seldom occurs.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics