In his book, Durkheim defined religion as being a unified set of beliefs and practices that share relations with sacred things. He also identified how some things in religion are set apart from others and are forbidden for its followers. It also includes the beliefs and practices that are shared by millions of other people who follow the same religion and speaks about how these beliefs and practices unite each of the many different people who follow the religion. Despite the fact that Durkheim went to great lengths to identify and explain the purpose of religion, there is one fundamental aspect of religion that he did not touch upon which includes references to the supernatural or the existence of God. He explained this by arguing the fact that the concept of God and supernatural things was fairly new and since science at the time was not so advanced, there were certain things that could not be rationally proved or explained. He said that for the early societies, anything that could not be rationally proved became something supernatural. Durkheim wrote at length about religions which give little or no importance to the existence of God which include Buddhism. He identified that in this religion, ensuring that the follower remains firm over the Four Noble Truths is something that is more important than any form of sin that they may become a part of. Durkheim worked with three concepts which included the concept of the sacred, beliefs and practices and the moral community.
Emile Durkheim is ranked among a number of famous French philosophers who have studied the problems associated with losing faith in a religion. Important examples of this include times when the Jacobins annihilated Catholicism from France and tried to replace it with an artificial religion that revolved around the concept of reason. Durkheim made it a mission to identify how modern societies can maintain morality without the presence of religious sanctions. He has argued that religion is the glue that holds society together and it is something that guides every of its followers away from the lure of material things and instead have them focus on a common devotion to sacred things. It also provides cohesion by promoting a sense of belonging and collective consciousness. One of his goals was to identify the effects on society as to what would happen in the case where the fundamental core of religion was taken out. He identified that religion is something that does not only bind the individual but it is something that affects the community as a whole. Durkheim was interested in studying the communal activities and bonds that give rise to religious activities. He argued that a religious phenomenon occurs when something from the normal everyday life is separated from something that is sacred and supernatural to the believers. He also pointed out that it is men that choose to consider an object sacred or common to everyday life and wrote about the concept of wine at mass as it represents the blood of Christ and not just a mere beverage. It is something that the religious community as a whole has given meaning to and made it a part of their worship. He also wrote that religion is society divinized and is not just a mere social creation. He said that when the masses of followers come together to worship, they are celebrating the power of their society as opposed to other religions in the world. He also stated that if religion is pulled out of society, it will not mean the end of society as he claims that society is the father of us all as it acts within us to elevate us to places where we dream to be.
Max Weber is a famous German sociologist and philosopher, and he is considered to be one of the three fathers of sociology. Like Durkheim, Weber too spent quite a chunk of his life to study the concept of religion. He started off his study by writing a number of different essays that focused on different religions all around the world. Over the course of his life, he had studied religions in China and India which led him to study religions like Confucianism, Taoism, Hinduism, Buddhism and Ancient Judaism.
During his study of religion, Weber focused on three main elements. The first one included the effect of religion and its ideas on the economy of the society where the religion was being practiced. The second element included the relationship between social stratification and religion and the third element focused on the differing characteristics of the Western society. He identified religion as being part of the core forces of society. He wrote of the Calvinist and he explained how their religious ideas where fundamental in social innovation. He also held it responsible for the development of the Western economy. He also went on to study rationalism and compared it beliefs of religion. He identified that the main core of the sociology of religion was the fall of the belief in magic in the Western society.
Although Durkheim’s theory of religion was based on a limited number of examples, it was Max Weber who went on to study different religions around the world. It was truly a large scale study as opposed to the one conducted by Durkheim. Weber’s primary focus was to study religions that had a global impact and as such, had millions of believes stationed all over different parts of the world. In his first essay which was titled The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, he was noted to study the impact of the religion of Christianity on the Western civilization, more specifically, on their thinking as well as their cultural beliefs. Weber worked very hard to discover how religion effected social change in a society. He pointed out an example by referencing Protestantism belief and how it brought forward the work ethic followed by its believers. He identified this as the roots which bred Capitalism in the world. On the other hand, he spoke about Hinduism as well and explained how this religion teaches its followers to forget about the material things of everyday life and stressed upon making its believers attain higher levels of spirituality. This allows Hindus to escape the grasp of the requirements of today’s materialistic society and instead focus upon pleasing the requirements of the spiritual world. This concept, therefore, refrains followers of Hinduism from spending their lives making and spending money as their primary motive. Weber then moves forward and discusses the religion of Christianity and labels it as the salvation religion. By this, he talks about the claims set forward which explain how people who have been followers of other religions and have divulged in sin can be saved from all of their ignorant behaviors of the past. This can only be done when they convert to certain beliefs and start abiding by their moral and ethical codes of living. Christianity, for example, speaks about sin and about people who commit these sinful activities. The primary belief behind the concepts laid forward by Christianity include that followers that have committed sin can ask for God’s forgiveness and it is God who is all forgiving and merciful. This concept plays a fundamental role for Christianity and its followers as it brings in the concept of forgiveness in religion and also allows people of other faiths to switch to it from their own religions, bringing forward a more unified religion around the world. This is also the fundamental reason why religions like Christianity are deemed as Active religions as opposed to Eastern religions which are more passive in nature. Christianity is a religion, therefore, that makes its followers continuously strive towards struggles against sin as well as any other negative aspects present in the society. Followers are given more freedom and are ensured that there is a second chance for everyone if they chose to mend their ways by living piously in the future.
Although the works by both Durkheim and Weber are different in nature considering both of them set out to study the concept of religion, each of them studied it using different frameworks. Excerpts from both of these sociologists works hold truth. Durkheim said that religion is a glue which holds society together which is true as it provides people in the same religion with a sense of belonging and togetherness. It is also true that men give more importance to things that have been declared as sacred as opposed to things that are a material part of everyday life. Religion is also something that not only affects a certain individual, but any form of issue in the beliefs would affect societies as a whole. Although numerous things mentioned by Durkheim are true, certain things however cannot be justified. He argues over how societies can still manage to function in the case where the religion has seen a loss of faith. In a case like this, societies can come down upon themselves if there are not set rules and codes to guide them. This is something that religion provides to society. Religion is also a source of great justice for its followers as it provides them with a complete guide as to what they are allowed to do and what they should not do. Removing that element can be disastrous. He speaks about society as being the father of us but a society without religion guiding it would not bring fairness and justice to all living in it. Weber’s studies revolved around many different religions and he was able to distinguish one religion from the other. His studies are quite accurate in depicting the social and ethical requirements of different religions. He speaks at length about Hinduism and Christianity. He also distinguishes between the two of them by identifying how they provide a moral code of life for their followers. Durkheim, on the other hand, took a more conceptual approach in identifying the need for religion in society and some of his observations were very accurate indeed while Weber focused on specific religions and made deductions about how they vary from one another. His depictions are also accurate considering he explained the major points of significance that each religion holds. It is, however, some of Durkheim’s theories that I believe are more persuasive as they discuss the concept of religion by deducing what each different religion pertains and how it effects the society. Weber explains each different religion and his takings on religion are also very true.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The definition of religion is the belief in a superhuman controlling power, especially a God or gods. Religion is important to people because some people need that comfort that after they die, something filling and happy will happen to them, such as Heaven or Reincarnation. Religion is important to people because, some people like to have the feeling that someone is watching over them, and is guiding them through their life. While researching two different world religions (Christianity and Islam) , this essay will contribute ideas on the spread of religion, how people view religions and compare and contrast religions to each other to find similarities and differences.…
- 504 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
As previously mentioned, functionalists argue that social order and solidarity to run smoothly – Durkheim argued that there are four main ways in which religion maintains value consensus. One way is through the sacred and profane, he argued that sacred referred to things that are separate from society and create feelings of awe, wonder and fear whereas profane referred to things that were inferior with no real significance. Durkheim therefore argued that the only thing powerful enough to inspire people in the way religion does is society itself therefore meaning people are not worshipping their religion or god, but in fact society – this means that people unite under the same belief, spreading shared norms and values all over and therefore creating consensus within society.…
- 974 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
* Functionalist agree: Durkheim – religious institutions help maintain social stability – distinguish between sacred ( things that inspire feeling of awe/wonder ) and profane (things that are ordinary and mundane)…
- 527 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The definition of a religion can vary depending on who you ask. The simplest definition of a religion is that for a religion to become a religion, there must be a belief of the supernatural and must also be a belief in God. The functionalists hold a different perspective on religion. Functionalists see religion as being there to fulfil the needs of society for example, functionalists feel that religion sets certain norms and values for society and gives people morals. Durkheim see's religion as something that contributes to society, rather than to any specific belief in god or any supernatural life form. For functionalists, society is a system of interrelated parts with basic needs that must be met in order to survive. Religion plays a key function for society as it creates social solidarity and a value consensus. Durkheim says that the key feature of religion is not a belief in gods or the supernatural, but a fundamental distinction between the sacred and the profane; as long as you see what you worship as sacred then Durkheim says that it is fine to be a religion. Durkheim believes in the collective conscience - a set of shared norms, values, beliefs and knowledge. Like in Durkheim's study of Totemism, it was proven that shared rituals bind individuals together, reminding them they are part of a group and reinforcing the idea of 'togetherness' in society. Moreover, other functionalists such as Malinowski, Parsons and Bellah, all share the same set of ideas that Durkheim has. Malinowski agrees that religion promotes…
- 1507 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
* This is supported by Emile Durkheim (1915) as he defines religion as the contribution it makes to social integration, rather than any specific belief in God or the supernatural.…
- 270 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Every major school of thought has its authors, its influencers, and its divine chosen, if you will. These men and women influence everything from macro economics and political science to the physical sciences of the known universe. Without the contribution of these grand individuals, academics would be destined to their origins, they would cease to develop and many would not even exist. So it is on the existence of these great minds in which we invest our confidence for an ever-growing world. There is one topic in particular, though, whose existence and development is greatly attributed to these individuals: religion.…
- 1649 Words
- 7 Pages
Best Essays -
Emile Durkheim studied a clan society called the Arunta, he explains that the collective worship of the sacred totem unified society. He explained that their totem is sacred, it inspired feelings of wonder and awe due to the fact it is different to every other normal, profane item. Durkheim believes that the key feature of religion was not merely a belief in gods or higher powers, but the difference between the sacred and mundane. Durkheim continues to say that whatever religion sees to be sacred, must be seen to represent society itself, therefore when one worships a sacred symbol, one is worshiping society itself. This shows that religion is a means of uniting all people and tribes, through a consensus.…
- 591 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
This paper is intended to show how religion is perceived to have several common elements but in essence that is not a true statement based on the terminology used to describe “religious practices”. People believe that typically religions have overlapping themes such as: higher powers to worship, followers, codes of conduct or morals, and a place of worship, however not all do. Because the term religion arose in western society it mainly only focuses on western culture and may not fully encompass the beliefs of different cultures in other parts of…
- 1031 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Durkheim defines religion as “a unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things”. He says all societies divide the world into the sacred and the profane. Sacred are things set apart and forbidden, inspiring feelings of awe, fear and wonder. Profane are ordinary things that have no significance. His view on sacred symbols represents society's collective consciousness which is the shared norms, values beliefs and knowledge that make social life possible; without such consciousness it would crumble. Participating in shared rituals binds individuals together reminding them that they are a part of a community. Religion defines values as sacred giving the people great power compared to non-believers. Through collective worship society understands the moral bonds that unite them. Durkheim argues that religion functions to reinforce the collective unity or social solidarity of a group. The individual sees religion performing a significant function allowing them to feel a part of society and strengthens us to face life's trials and motivates us to overcome obstacles that would otherwise overpower us. Durkheim used the religion of Aborigines to develop his argument. He calls their religion 'totemism', as each clan of aborigines had a sacred symbol called a totem which was a symbol of their gods and of their society which reinforces their sense of…
- 927 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
From the word religion, it came from two Latin words “re” and “ligare” which to reconnect. Religion promotes high principles of human morality for the establishment of good relations among society’s members and eliminates all discrimination. As a result of this, it creates teamwork. It makes the society work as a team to help each other get by on “the passage of life” instead of making it more difficult. Also doing this will not only reduce conflicts and hatred with one another, plus it also keeps everyone organized and will work together to create a better world for the next generation of our world. Even though we know the purpose of this, why is this important to…
- 803 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
To achieve this goal, I have organized my paper into four main sections. One of them is about God’s existence, two of them is the points of view about God and religion. And I described atheists’ perspective and theists.’ And the lasting thing I wrote is about the negative effect of religion on our society.…
- 2687 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
The importance of religions related to their spiritual and ethical messages is held to a high degree of importance. The importance of religions related to their cultural contributions to the arts and the humanities is also held to a high degree of importance. The importance of religions related to their alliances with political and economic institutions is held to a high degree of importance because the authority and power of the ruler and of the priest reinforced one another and religion reinforced the powers of legislation as well as those of administration. The difference between studying a religion and studying about a religion is that when someone studies a religion, they believe in the beliefs and values of that religion and are studying…
- 588 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx and Max Weber all offer a wide array of thoughts and ideas regarding to religion. Firstly, Emile Durkheim's views of religion will be explained. Durkheim chose to adopt the idea that if religion gave birth to everything essential in society it is because society is the soul of religion (Cosman, 1973, p. 191). Thus, Durkheim chose to view religion as a function which can strengthen social bonds whilst also integrating individuals into society. Durkheim also believed that religion is divided up into two separate sections the sacred and the profane. The sacred consisted of rites, behavior or objects of reverence that religious belief deemed special, whilst the profane was deemed as everything and anything else in the world which did not have any religious meaning or function (Giddens 1972, p.243). Both of these categories depend on each other for survival; the sacred cannot survive without the profane to support it and vice versa. Karl Marx chose to adopt a…
- 1387 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
In order to truly assess the legitimacy of Durkheim 's functionalist definition of religion, his notion of Social facts, (upon which his theory is constructed) must be examined. Durkheim advocated that amongst the reputable fields of biology, psychology and history, Sociology also warranted a specific focus. It was, for him: a 'sui generis ' "something that had to be explained on its own terms". Sociology was not, for Durkheim, a field that should be susceptible to overlapping subject matter: he believed that there existed concrete social facts recognisable "by the power of eternal coercion" which they are "capable of exercising over individuals". This claim is an imperative one because it is the platform on which his functionalist definition of Religion is situated, without it his beliefs on Totemism cannot materialise. Here Comte 's belief that sociology was the 'queen science ' at the top of the scientific hierarchy seems influential. Durkheim admired Comte 's belief that sociology should be concerned with concrete social facts and his desire to find humanities fundamental tendency "which directly impels man to ameliorate his condition". But he felt Comte had merely shown why such facts were useful, not where they originated from. In Gabriel Tarde we find an objection to Durkheim 's scientific approach as he says "sociological concepts which are released from all psychological foundation (are) frivolous and fantastical". This seems a valid argument: to completely detach sociology from pyschology or any other study of the human condition seems outlandish, more then one factor is surely at play here. Is sociology not an umbrella term for a study of the intricate intertwining factors that make up social systems, not a discipline overriding everything. It almost seems that Durkheim 's desire to see sociology as a respected scientific discipline leads him to regard social facts as external, because through this he can make a case for his beloved disciplines…
- 1559 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Durkheim upheld and expanded on the views of Fustel in his last writing The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. Durkheim discussed his views of religions and how each has a sense of sacred and profane that impacts the morals and beliefs of societies, which also helps mold the collected social structure. These sacred and profane are ritualistic and bond people of society on a deeper sense of community. While profane can be considered any of the daily routines and boring tasks that people complete, sacred is more meaningful and draws beliefs and practices from religion to form rituals. An important key function of the belief of sacred and profane is the point of how this happens within social structures other than religion.…
- 790 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays