According to R. Dale Guthrie, author of The Nature of Paleolithic Art, “testosterone-fueled boys created most prehistoric cave art”. He also claims the handprints found in the caves are predominately made by young boys age nine to seventeen. The art of animals being speared and eviscerated is violent and can be compared to such things as sports, cars, and fighting that the teenage boys today like. Also, he notes that the sculpted figures such as the Venus of Willendorf, display women nude and with exaggerated sexual parts. Hence the theory of testosterone-fueled boys is a popular theory among other colleagues. Paul Martin, professor of quaternary biography at the University of Arizona, who credits Guthrie’s knowledge on human behavior as being extraordinary, states “If he finds that much cave art reflects teenage or preteen preoccupations, I am prepared to believe him”. Although this theory sounds plausible, the art in the cave seems to have more meaning than just adolescent boys letting out their aggressions by painting. The people back then were hunters and gatherers, consequently, the boys were probably learning to hunt and gather their food, which would seemingly release a lot of their aggression before the thought of going in a cave to paint. The theory of adolescent boys being the creators of the cave art is plausible, it is not as realistic as it seems
According to R. Dale Guthrie, author of The Nature of Paleolithic Art, “testosterone-fueled boys created most prehistoric cave art”. He also claims the handprints found in the caves are predominately made by young boys age nine to seventeen. The art of animals being speared and eviscerated is violent and can be compared to such things as sports, cars, and fighting that the teenage boys today like. Also, he notes that the sculpted figures such as the Venus of Willendorf, display women nude and with exaggerated sexual parts. Hence the theory of testosterone-fueled boys is a popular theory among other colleagues. Paul Martin, professor of quaternary biography at the University of Arizona, who credits Guthrie’s knowledge on human behavior as being extraordinary, states “If he finds that much cave art reflects teenage or preteen preoccupations, I am prepared to believe him”. Although this theory sounds plausible, the art in the cave seems to have more meaning than just adolescent boys letting out their aggressions by painting. The people back then were hunters and gatherers, consequently, the boys were probably learning to hunt and gather their food, which would seemingly release a lot of their aggression before the thought of going in a cave to paint. The theory of adolescent boys being the creators of the cave art is plausible, it is not as realistic as it seems