Early Christianity And Platonism

Do Platonism and Panthiesm have more in common than one might assume? Both Platonism and Panthiesm are two common aspects from ancient philosophy that many people believe in. People have adopted these belief systems. These two topics were introduced millions of years ago, both widely practiced, they have somewhat of a religious background. However, they both have certain things that make each practice unique. Platonists share the view or belief that abstract objects exist. Platonism is the philosophy from ancient Greece during the Socratic period. Their philosophy is inspired from Plato’s views. Plato was a student of Socrates, so in a way, Platonist views are also derived from Socrates. The views from this belief system were taken from The
Platonism is a philosophy which had huge influence upon early Christianity. There are some significant points of disagreement, but still the early church fathers found a lot of Truth in Plato. Platonism is a reasoning which had tremendous influence on early Christianity. There are some noteworthy contradictions, but at the same time the early church fathers discovered a considerable measure of truth in Plato. He was one of the first rationalists to scrutinize the unethical conduct of the pagan gods. He announced that God couldn't behave in any improper conduct, and along these lines the divine beings must be false divine
If Platonism is characterized as the otherworldly point of view that there are endlessly numerous essentially existing conceptual elements, then Plantinga's Does God Have A Nature? speaks to an exhaustive barrier of Christian Platonism. Plantinga recognizes that most Christians trust that God is the uncreated inventor for goodness' sake and all things rely on upon him, and he relies on nothing by any stretch of the imagination. The made universe displays no issue for this teaching. God's creation is reliant on him in an assortment of ways and God is not the slightest bit subordinate upon it. On the other hand, what presents an issue for this tenet is the whole domain of Platonic universals, properties, sorts, recommendations, numbers, sets, conditions of undertakings and conceivable universes. These things are everlasting, having no starting or end. Dynamic items are additionally said to exist fundamentally. Their non-presence is inconceivable. Be that as it may, how then are these dynamic articles identified with God? Plantinga outlines the issue:
According to Augustine, God made everything unmistakable from him; did he then make these things? Apparently not; they have no beginnings. Is it true that they are subject to him? Be that as it may, how could a thing whose non-presence is inconceivable . . . rely on anything for its presence? What's more, shouldn't something be said about the attributes and properties