Early Leadership Theory Relating to Tents-R-Us Case Study
LEADERSHIP IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT
EARLY LEADERSHIP THEORY PERTAINING TO CASE STUDY
TENTS-R-US
Contents Page
1. Introduction
2. Background- Early Leadership Theory & Tent-R-Us
3. Personality Era
1. The Great Man Theory & Tents-R-Us
2. Trait Theory & Tents-R-Us
4. Influence Era
1. Power Relations & Tents-R-Us
2. Persuasion Period & Tents-R-U
5. Strengths and Weakness of Tents-R-Us
6. Conclusion
7. References
1. Introduction
The following report was compiled to discuss early leadership theories relating to the case study Tents-R-Us, with citation to relevant literature throughout. The ones that are relevant include; the personality era which includes the great man and trait approach, also included is the influence era which includes power relations and the persuasive period. Within this report the background to early leadership theory will be outlined to give a basis of knowledge. The report is organised as follows; background to early leadership theories and the case study Tents-R-Us. The personality era discussing the concepts of the great man approach, which was based on that leaders were born to lead, Tents-R-Us will be linked to the literature. Trait approach which was a development on that of the great man, in which a group of traits were devised to determine what, is needed to be a leader. Once again Tents-R-Us will be linked to this area. The report will then delve into the influence era in which power relations and persuasion period will be discussed, Tents-R-Us will be correlated also to this literature. The report will then follow through to the strengths and weaknesses within the leadership style that has been connected to early leadership and determine whether or not there will be continued success and growth within Tents-R-Us.
2. Background
It has been generally noted that around the 1300’s leadership was first
EARLY LEADERSHIP THEORY PERTAINING TO CASE STUDY
TENTS-R-US
Contents Page
1. Introduction
2. Background- Early Leadership Theory & Tent-R-Us
3. Personality Era
1. The Great Man Theory & Tents-R-Us
2. Trait Theory & Tents-R-Us
4. Influence Era
1. Power Relations & Tents-R-Us
2. Persuasion Period & Tents-R-U
5. Strengths and Weakness of Tents-R-Us
6. Conclusion
7. References
1. Introduction
The following report was compiled to discuss early leadership theories relating to the case study Tents-R-Us, with citation to relevant literature throughout. The ones that are relevant include; the personality era which includes the great man and trait approach, also included is the influence era which includes power relations and the persuasive period. Within this report the background to early leadership theory will be outlined to give a basis of knowledge. The report is organised as follows; background to early leadership theories and the case study Tents-R-Us. The personality era discussing the concepts of the great man approach, which was based on that leaders were born to lead, Tents-R-Us will be linked to the literature. Trait approach which was a development on that of the great man, in which a group of traits were devised to determine what, is needed to be a leader. Once again Tents-R-Us will be linked to this area. The report will then delve into the influence era in which power relations and persuasion period will be discussed, Tents-R-Us will be correlated also to this literature. The report will then follow through to the strengths and weaknesses within the leadership style that has been connected to early leadership and determine whether or not there will be continued success and growth within Tents-R-Us.
2. Background
It has been generally noted that around the 1300’s leadership was first
References: Bass, BM (ed.) (1981). Stogdill 's handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. (revised and extended version) New York: Free Press. Bass, BM (1990). Bass Stogdill 's handbook of leadership. 3rd edition. New York: Free Press. Bass, BM, (2008), The Bass handbook of leadership: theory, research, and managerial applications, 4th edition, New York, Free Press Bolden, R (2003) Bowden, A.O. (1927). A study on the personality of student leadership in the United States. Journal of. Abnormal Social Psychology, Carlyle T, (1841), Hero’s and Hero Worship, James Fraser French, J.R.P., Jr., & Raven, B.H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research Galton Goleman D, 1998, Working with Emotional. Intelligence, London, Bloomsbury Publishing Mechanic D, (1962), ‘Sources of power of lower participants in complex organizations ', Administrative quarterly science, Vol.7 pp.349-64 Stogdill, Ralph M. .(1974). viii, 613 pp. Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. New York, NY, US: Free Press. Schenk C, (1928), “Leadership”, Infantry Journal, Vol.33. pp. 111-22 Van Seters, D.A Van Wart, Montgomery. (2003). Public-sector leadership theory: An assessment. Public Administration Review 23:214–28 www.Clanmcallister.org (accessed 30/10/2011 20:00)