Since man has walked on earth, he had always been in conflict with himself and other human beings. For thousands of years, there have been many furious battles fought among rival groups over different issues that seemed big at that time. The end results of each of the conflicts were always pretty much the same: the mass deaths and destruction of civilizations, and horrible physical and emotional impacts of the individuals left to live with the horrors they had faced.…
When one is shown to be capable of death and destruction, they are no longer seen as human, but alien.…
fight, to avoid a similar outcome. “Terror dominated everyone, as if all world were being…
You should see Apocalypse Now for a spectacular depiction of the insanity of war and mankind in general.…
Since the begging of time humans have resorted to war in times of conflict or disagreement. Nevertheless, humans have never had tremendous annihilation power up until WWII and the creation of the atomic bomb. Dropping such bomb would ensure thousands of people would lose their lives some of who were innocent and some not. Although, the decision to drop the bomb is controversial it was necessary due to the stakes of sovereignty, ethnic cleansing prevention, and the end to Hitler’s regime. One cannot merely justify killing alone however, one can rationalize and outweigh the outcome if Hitler’s regime would have won the war.…
One perspective is that the aliens have a deadly adaptable virus that would kill human kind if ever unleashed, in contrast the aliens feel that the humans are killing them for no reason. In reality the war is a misunderstanding that two characters race to remedy before the fleet arrives in Lusitania. Card masterfully uses different perspectives to give depth and suspense to the story.…
"Everyone is aware of the difficult and menacing situation in which human society - shrunk into one community with a common fate - finds itself, but only a few acts accordingly. Most people go on living their everyday life: half frightened, half indifferent, they behold the ghostly tragicomedy this is being performed on the international stage before the eyes and ears of the world. But on that stage, on which the actors under the floodlights play their ordained parts, our fate of tomorrow, life or death of the nations, is being decided. It would be different if the problem were not one of things made by man himself, such as the atomic bomb and other means of mass destruction equally menacing all peoples. It would be different, for instance, if an epidemic of bubonic plague were threatening the entire world. In such a case conscientious and expert persons would be brought together and they would work out an intelligent plan to combat the plague. After having reached agreement upon the right ways and means, they would submit their plan to the governments. Those would hardly raise serious objections but rather agree speedily on the measures to be taken. They certainly would never think of trying to handle the matter in such a way that their own nation would be spared whereas the next one would be decimated. But could not our situation be compared to one of a menacing epidemic? People are unable to view this situation in its true light, for their eyes are blinded by passion. General fear and anxiety create hatred and aggressiveness. The adaptation to warlike aims and activities has corrupted the mentality of man; as a result, intelligent, objective, and humane thinking has hardly any effect and is even suspected and persecuted as unpatriotic. There are, no doubt, in the opposite camps enough people of sound judgment and sense of justice who would be capable and eager to work out together a solution for the factual…
In this day and age, many may acknowledge the very controversial issue of technology for peace. This subject is so debated because nuclear weapons have the ability to destroy the world as we know it. However, they are essential if we are to protect ourselves. We need to have them, because almost anybody can gain control of them and become a threat. Mutually Assured Destruction insures that both sides need to have weapons of mass destruction to prevent a nuclear war. The use of human soldiers to make peace is too great a risk, and not worth it. With such treacherous weapons as these, it is crucial that we make all the right decisions, but we must also give the world some credit and acknowledge the fact that people have learnt from their mistakes, like what happened in Japan, and nobody wants that to happen again. It is imperative that we have these arms because the technology is already out there and almost anyone can obtain them, Mutually Assured Destruction insures that as long as both sides have them then nobody will strike, and the risk of human casualties is too great and not worth it.…
In Blade Runner the bleak vision portrayed illustrates a chaotic nuclear holocaust, ecological fragility through soil depletion and acid rain. Man has not only subdued the earth but also conquered and utterly defeated it. The sixties and seventies were a time of great social, cultural and historical changes that also led to questions about man’s decreasing humanity. Both texts are cautionary tales warning about the threat to humanity posed by science. Technological advances all contribute to humanity moving away from the natural rhythms of life and from what it means to be a human being.…
second, is the culmination of the human quest for bigger and better weaponry. On August 6th an earth-…
Only man starts wars. Humans are the only animal that is willing to knowingly kill its own kind even when he has not wronged him. South Korea has said that they will wreak havoc on the United States. What have we done for them to say that other than try to help? Humans join together in mass crowds just to watch a fight. In school, students gather around the two people in the altercation and “egg it on”. Humans have taken it step further by having animals to fight each other. Michael Vick, a…
A person’s best response to conflict is to stand up for what is right, without worrying if it is right or wrong. Some people stand back and watch terrible things happen because they put their own safety before others. There are also times where only one person can make a difference. The thing that most people need to understand about the best response to conflict is that there is always going to be danger and atrocious things going on in the world unless people do something about it.…
Ridley Scott’s “Blade Runner” illustrates the fact that Science Fiction films are frequently concerned with the dangers rather than the benefits of science and technology. Released in 1982, “Blade Runner” conveys to its audience a frightening and nightmarish vision of a dystopian technological future society. The film is set in post-apocalyptic Los Angeles in the year 2019. It is a world enveloped in a putrid atmosphere of darkness, gloom and corruption. Fallout from the recent nuclear holocaust, suggested by frequent explosive effects in the opening sequence, has blotted out the sun and acid rain perpetually descends. Through its delineation and portrayal of three scientists, “Blade Runner” explores the dehumanizing effects of technology, together with the potential exploitation of science for the purpose of achieving a God-like omnipotence and political dominance in society.…
Next, this movie also relates to the functional perspective. This perspective states that in order to understand society, we must look at it in terms of parts and whole systems. Once again, the human race failed to see that even though these were ‘aliens’ from another planet, they didn’t take into consideration that they were still living creatures with their own lifestyles and families that they have to take care of. They invaded their life and were only worried about themselves and would take down anything in their way in order to get the gold, which is the mineral that they are there for.…
Due to the entertainment value and trivial view towards science fiction films, science fiction films can often depict serious cultural and political issues through symbolic characters, creatures, and setting. During the Cold War, science fiction films began portraying technology and foreign invaders as potential threats on our national security, as a result of the growing international tensions and rapid technological growth between nations. The 1999 science fiction film The Iron Giant by Brad Bird is a film that want to revamp the Cold War view of technology by comparing the 1950s view with the modern age audience. The story takes place in the 1950s and is about an extraterrestrial robot that becomes a concern for many people,…