Preview

East Of Eden Research Paper

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
77 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
East Of Eden Research Paper
In East of Eden it is clearly shown that when given the chance humans will usually pick the evil road; however, when they do so they always justify their actions.
The United States dropped the atomic bomb to end World War II and the end of the war was a certainly a good thing; however, was the death of 150,000-200,000 people justified? Many people consider this one of the most malevolent actions of all world history, but

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    World War II was a global war from 1939 to 1945. Japan surrendered on 15 August 1945, which brought the total victory of the Allies. Right before Japan’s surrender, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima and another one on Nagasaki. The atomic bombs caused great damage to Japan and killed estimated 129000 to 246000 people. However, the bombings helped to bring the war to an end. Whether President Truman should make the decision to drop the bombs is still a topic to debate. Due to the fact that it was the best decision Truman could make, the bombs ended the war, and reduced the loss at that time, President Truman was justified in his decision to drop the bombs on japan.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I want to thank you for your response and clearly stating your perspective regarding the United States bombing Japan. However, I must respectfully disagree with your argument. I do believe the atomic bomb was necessary to end the war because without the bomb the United States was prepared to invade Japan. Statistically speaking the use of omb actually saved thousands of American and Japanese lives rather than invading Japan. I do concur with the questionable morality of using the bomb because killing many individuals was not an easy decision Truman had to make, consequently the decision ended the otherwise long and drawn out war. Japan was prepared to put a fight, no matter the circumstances. With the Japanese army and civilian militia expected…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Harry Truman is justified for sending atomic bombs from the United States to Japan civilian cities. Two parts of Japan in particular named Hiroshima and Nagasaki were targeted to kill off the civilians. The bombs were supposed to target a certain range of people, the hiroshima ranged from 90,000 to 146,000 and the Nagasaki ranged from 39,000 to 80,000 deaths. These bombs initiated the action of surrender from Japan and this happened on August 15, 1945. There are documents that prove Harry Truman should be justified for the participation in winning the war for the United States.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hiroshima PROS and CONS

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although the use of the bomb killed many innocent civilians it also saved many lives because if the bomb had not dropped the war would have gone on with more air raids and more attacks on cities and many soldiers on both sides would have died. If the US had not dropped the atomic bomb the nuclear arms race would have would have went on and the standards would have been different and it may not have been just two cities but an entire country.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was the atomic bomb truly as diabolical despite putting an end to WWII and saved much more millions in the process? After defeating two out of the three main Axis powers (Italy and Germany), Japan, the remaining main Axis power, still had no intentions of surrendering. The United States was forced to be in the position in which they drop the atomic bomb on Japan and sacrifice Japanese lives for their own or reconsider forming another plan to bring Japan to mercy. Ultimately, the U.S. was in favor with the atomic bomb so they dropped two in total, one each in two major cities: Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This had successfully brought Japan to their unconditional surrender and to the end of World War II.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was the use of the atomic bomb on Japan a good decision? In July 1945 the U.S. dropped the atom bomb on Japan saving hundreds of thousands of American lives. By dropping the atom bomb on Japan America was able to end WWII earlier saving lives on both sides. In WWII the US should have used the atomic bomb on Japan because it saved American lives and helped end the war earlier.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Europe, the war with Germany was over but Japan was still fighting. So the U.S could concreted on the war with Japan. The U.S had atomic bombs ready and a decision had to be made; should they sent ground forces to invade Japan or should they bomb Japan. So on August 1945 the U.S decided to drop atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and this created some controversy. Some people though it was a good idea to bomb Japan, while others say that 200,000 innocent people were killed. I believe that bombing the two cities was the right decision because it did save the lives of many U.S soldiers and it ended World War II.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some say that the use of the atomic bomb was inhumane because of the devastation upon human life. While others say that if the atomic bomb had not been used in the manner it was, that World War II may have continued costing more loss of human life than the bombing (The National Interest, n.d.). America was very strong in the act to defend the country and its citizens, dealing with the moral dilemmas behind the bombing, the mass destruction caused by the bombing, the horrible physical and emotional effects on the citizens of Japan, and strained relations between America and…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I feel that they were not morally justified because the atomic bombs were extremely horrific. The bombings killed so many lives of innocent people and the horrible effects on the people for years after the bombing. The after effects of the bombing have caused health problems such as cancer and birth defects for decades later to people that weren’t even born yet.…

    • 62 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rules Of Engagement Essay

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages

    President Truman authorized atomic bombs to be dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945. The two bombings killed at least 129,000 INNOCENT civilians. During the following months, more people died from the effect of burns, radiation sickness and other injuries. Six days after the Nagasaki bombing Japan surrendered and World War II ended.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The propaganda taught in grade schools was that the United States dropped the atomic bomb to save American lives and end the war. President Truman and some advisors stated after the war, that somewhere between five hundred thousand to one million American lives would be loss with an invasion of the Japanese homeland (37). So, in an attempt to bring the War in the Pacific to an end they used the atomic bomb. They also justified the use of the atomic bomb by claiming using the bomb would save an untold number of Japanese lives. The information which came from President Truman and his administrative sounded sensible and salved the conscious of America, but was it the truth? In his book, historian J. Samuel Walker provides a step by step analysis of events leading to Truman’s use of the atomic bomb to bring World War II to closure and extensive coverage of the relationship of the United States and the U.S.S.R.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bombings in Japan

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I think President Truman’s decision to drop the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was wrong. I understand that many people feel this was the right decision and there was no other way to end war but here are a few reasons why I think the bomb droppings was a mistake. One reason is because the United States didn’t even leave a warning for Japan to get ready or give them a chance to surrender from the world’s harshest war weapon (Primary source packet #2). In another document, Mr. Byrnes’ didn’t agree with the atomic bomb incident because Japan was already defeated and wouldn’t have made it another 6 months (document based questions #2). If the United States would’ve just waited a little longer or use a less harsh method that they knew more about, I bet Japan would’ve gave up and let us win. I also understand the bomb plan was a success in ending the war (Hiroshima: the first city destroyed) but I also know the United States did not predict how badly the effects would be or how destructive the bombs actually were (Primary Source Packet #2). Just because this plot was designed to save American lives and cost (fog of war lesson #5), I think the damages and side effects were much greater than anything that has ever happened in war. In Life: Hiroshima and Nagasaki excerpt, a man spoke about what he saw, “In the following waves [after the initial blast] people’s bodies were terribly squeezed, and then their internal organs ruptured. Then the blast blew the broken bodies at 500 to 1,000 miles per hour through the flaming, rubble-filled air. Practically everybody within a radius of 6,500 feet was killed or seriously injured and all buildings crushed or disemboweled.” This statement made me realize that innocent people died because of Truman’s say and I don’t think this was fair at all. At the least he should’ve warned Japan and the innocent people to get out, surrender, or there will be trouble. Another guy said he could see “miles of crushed,…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First I will give the perspective of those who believe the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was indeed justified. Operation Downfall was the planned invasion of Japan but it would not be like any normal invasion. The American forces knew that they planned to confront provoked and zealous Japanese, which would cause skyrocketing casualties. The majority of the forces believed in a concept referred to as bushido, which demands bravery and extreme self-sacrifice. Honor comes from death and disgrace from surrender, so those who willingly gave their lives were esteemed and respected. This belief stems from feudal Japanese samurai warriors but is still widely accepted as a motive for war. During World War II, when the Japanese air fleet was outdated, they developed a defense of kamikaze pilots which were basically suicide bombers. This showed the United States that when backed into a corner the Japanese were going to fight back with everything they had. It was estimated that invading Japan with a normal attack would cost 1.2 million casualties (Source #2, see annotation). This was one of the most prevalent factors in President Truman’s decision to authorize the use of the atomic bomb. The other leading influence on the atomic bomb’s justification was the Japanese…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some would argue that thousands of innocent Japanese people were killed in the nuclear bombings. On the Contrary, more lives would have been lost if America had not dropped the bombs. An estimated 1 million American lives would have been lost along with an estimated 2 million Japanese lives in the case of a full invasion of Japan by the Allies and the Soviets. The Japanese military was preparing to militarize the citizens by manufacturing guns that could only be fired about 3 times before breaking to be shot as Americans walked past (White).…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Having explored the evidence I believe that America was justified in dropping the first atomic bomb but not the second. The reasons as to why I believe this will be explored in this essay. Near the end of WW2, two atomic bombs were dropped on Japan. The first on the 6th of August 1945 on Hiroshima and the second on the 9th August on Nagasaki. This was carried out under the order of Harry S. Truman, the American president at the time. In Europe the war was mainly over, but in Asia Japan still prevailed. America was contemplating a full scale invasion of Japan following the attack on Pearl Harbour however this was not executed as the atomic bombs were dropped instead.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays