(English version)
By: Johan Kollén
My essay is about the EU's double jeopardy that allows a person charged with a crime that goes to trial may not go to trial on the case again , as well as several other institutional problems. I find this interesting because through this leads many people who owe and who you can trap but may not take the defendants to court. This happens consistently and is a result of parliament's decision to institute the ECHR in Swedish law. ECHR orders over the Swedish law and is controlling . Will address how the ECHR and EU law have involved themselves in Swedish legislation and judgments.
The purpose of this paper is more . Firstly Parliamentary engaging in the Swedish legal world and how the Swedish legal system is different from the outside world in the form of the ECHR.
question
1st What problems include the ECHR in Swedish law ?
2nd Why influenced Swedish justice system and how?
My approach to this work is to collect information from the web and hopefully interviewing prominent individuals in the subject. Then compile this information and analyze
ECHR is the European Convention on Human Rights. There is no international law but more of a called up by the EU . This konvetion includes several different laws that will give people a safer and better life in the protection of the state.
Some individual cases can be taken up in Europe court then they may be unique and that has broken the ECHR .
The laws are similar to many of the UN's human rights in addition to a few differences at points . Rules that shall sustain a good human life quality ss prohibition of slavery and the right to a fair trial are some of the rules .
However, when the ECHR merged into the Swedish law arises that several concerns.
A great tribulations with this is that Swedish national judiciary adopts the ECHR straight up and down without customizing it for Sweden . When I