Preview

Econ312 Week 3 Assignment - the Microsoft Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
918 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Econ312 Week 3 Assignment - the Microsoft Case
The Microsoft Case It is well known that the Microsoft Corporation is the largest computer operating system manufacturer in the United States. The in late 1990’s, more than ninety percent of all personal computers that were sold were equipped with Microsoft [ (Wright, 1998) ]. Software companies felt secure in writing their programs in the Windows platform, knowing that their software would be compatible for most people’s PCs. With most software now being written for Windows, computer manufacturers would then install Windows in their products, confident that consumers would buy it. This is how the Windows monopoly was created. Bill Gates built his company through aggression and determination, often buying up small companies whose ideas he liked. For those companies who he could not buy, he would create similar products to theirs, selling them for less and marketing them strategically. The tactics he used to create his Microsoft Empire were all legal, yet in 1998 Microsoft found themselves facing a lawsuit against the U.S. Justice Department in violation of the Antitrust Laws [ (Wright, 1998) ]. Antitrust Laws were created in the late 1800’s, early 1900’s as legislation to prevent unlawful monopolies, to promote competition, and to encourage the production of quality goods at reasonable prices, protecting the public from monopolized markets that take advantage of their consumers [ (Hartman, 1997) ]. The U.S Justice Department declared that Microsoft was in fact a monopoly, although Bill Gates always denied these allegations. Under Antitrust Laws, firms considered to be monopolies are held to a higher standard and often have stricter policies and laws that other corporations do not have to abide by. The characteristics of a monopoly are simple: a firm that is the sole producer of a product with no close substitutions. In this case, Microsoft held over 90% of the market share with their operating system and browser, with no competitors able to get their


Bibliography: Caroll, J. (2000, April 14). Microsoft Violated US Monopoly Law, Rules Judge. Irish Times , p. 16. Financial Times Information. (1999). Finance and Economics: Big Friendly Giant. The Economist . Hartman, S. D. (1997). Antitrust Law. Retrieved July 24, 2011, from West 's Encyclopedia of American Law : http://iris.nyit.edu/~shartman/mba0101/trust.htm Hawker, N., & Lande, R. (2011, May 17). Victorious in Defeat. The Baltimore Sun , p. 15A. McConnell, C. R., Brue, S. L., & Flynn, S. M. (2012). Economics - Priniciples, Problems and Policies. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin. Wright, D. (1998). Bill Gates Must Play Fair. The Atlanta Journal and Constitution , 16A.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Despite owning a foundation to help with international and domestic issues, Gates’ clash with Apple shows what lengths he is willing to go to in order to achieve his own wealth. When dealing with presenters whom he interviews, Gates would make remarks such as “That’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard!” as a way to test the individual of their ideas (Biography). He became known as a relentless competitor, leaving Microsoft with a monopoly for PC. Bill Gates’ unforgiving methods for success put him in the Robber Baron category. He had run-ins with Apple for stealing some of their programs. His methods for proving his employees’ commitment to projects is too harsh and…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Is Microsoft a monopoly? In what ways could it be considered a monopoly? What markets are involved? What anti-trust legislation would apply? Is anti-trust legislation "fair" to firms like Microsoft? Why or why not?…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Strategic Behavior Oligopolies . An interesting example of strategic behavior comes from a 1997 article about Microsoft’s investment in Apple (New Straits Times, 1997). The article is included in the Required Readings list. Facing tough anti-trust scrutiny from government agencies, Microsoft provided financial support to Apple in order to ensure Apple’s survival and, therefore, to ensure that competitiveness in the industry remains. Moreover, the partnership with Apple provided an additional market for Microsoft’s products – the MS Office and the IE products were to be bundled with the MAC OS as one of the conditions for this financing. Discuss this case in the context of market structure and strategic behavior. What market structure do these firms operate in? Why did Microsoft need to preserve competitiveness in the industry? What was Microsoft afraid of in the even...…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    see if Microsoft was trying to create a monopoly of the computer software market. They…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Shrink-Wrap Agreements

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    References: Miller, R. L. & Jentz, G. A. (2010). Fundamentals of Business Law: Summary Cases. 8th Edition 9781111973117: Cengage…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Monopoly Vs Monopoly

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Not everyone has a “get out of jail free” card in life; unless of course they are playing the classic family board game, Monopoly. Those who monopolize a specific market most definitely do not have a “get out of jail free” card, as they are committing felonies. Both of these different monopolies are a great pleasure to win, but a pain to lose. In this paper I will compare and contrast these two different forms of monopolization.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Usa vs Microsoft

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this case Microsoft Corporation is suited by the United State of America, this case concerns the Antitrust and trade regulation topic of the law, Microsoft is suited for illegal thwarting and violation of the Sherman act section 1 and 2. Some elements are required to be qualifying of a violation of the Sherman act, for the Section 1, three elements are necessary: first it should have an agreement, secondly this agreement should unreasonably restrains completion and finally it should affect interstate commerce. Regarding the Second section of The Sherman Act two main elements are required : the “possession of monopoly power in the relevant market” and “the willful acquisition or maintenance of that power as distinguished from growth or development as a consequence of a superior product, business acumen, or historic accident”. Microsoft is a worldwide company in the computing sector and has a dominant position in the computer operating system sector, this case began during the 90s, the plaintiff is the United States of America and the defendant is Microsoft. On May 18, 1998, the United States of America and a group of State plaintiffs filed separate (and soon thereafter consolidated) suited Microsoft for abusing its monopoly and for having an illegal antitrust behavior. The US government alleged that by shipping Internet explorer browser along with windows OS 1995, Microsoft was ensuring its own monopoly. Microsoft also according to the United State and some companies did not want to make compatible the internet explorer with the other operating system, by engaging a range of exclusion for the Mediaware program which is supposed to make software compatible with any operating system. The main issue in this case would be according to me: Does Microsoft Corporation has the right to take advantage of its dominant position on the…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Microsoft has spent 21 years fighting antitrust battles with the US government. These battles began with claims of Microsoft monopolizing the software market, specifically regarding internet browsers. Although the cases were settled in 2002, there is still discussion as to whether or not the claims against Microsoft were truly valid.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Microsoft Antitrust Case

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Where Microsoft has been successful in invention of windows, it was also claimed to get involve in anticompetitive practices that is the violation of Antitrust Law. It is claimed that Microsoft made it’s windows incompatible with Netscape Navigator. Microsoft was very worried about the popularity of Netscape navigator and to overcome with this situation Microsoft made an updated version of its windows with installed Internet Explorer, which was impossible to uninstall.…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jackson V. Microsoft

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    He stated Microsoft was controlling a monopoly. He also ruled against Microsoft for taking actions to eliminate a rival competition. In April of 2000, Judge Thomas ruled against Microsoft and forced Microsoft to break into two separate sanctioning bodies, one side to produce the operating system and the other to produce the web browser and other…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An evaluation of the case findings and Microsoft’s defense led me to agree with the Court. The first step in reaching this opinion was to determine if Microsoft is in fact a monopoly. Monopolization is proven by two elements. One is that the company “possesses…

    • 583 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Microsoft Court Case

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Judge Jackson issued his findings of fact on November 5, 1999, which stated that Microsoft's dominance in its computer operating systems market constituted a monopoly, and that Microsoft had taken actions to crush threats to that monopoly, including Apple, Java, Netscape, Lotus Notes, Real Networks and Linux. The decision was divided in two pieces and in April of 2000, the judge issued his decisions that Microsoft had committed monopolization, attempted monopolization, and was trying in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Discussion Paper

    • 9801 Words
    • 40 Pages

    Professor of Economics, Stanford University, and Gordon and Betty Moore Senior Fellow, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research. Email address: tbres@leland.stanford.edu. I am grateful to several people for comments, but especially to Jacques CrJmer. While I served in the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and continue, at this writing, to consult to the Division, this paper does not represent the opinion or policy position of the Division but only my own view.…

    • 9801 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Anti-Trust Law

    • 1184 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Americans have long loved free market system and the competition that it fosters. Competition among businesses has been regulated by anti-trust acts recently; however they help to maintain a fair and equitable system where the small business is able to compete with the big business. The anti-trust laws enable the consumer to purchase a quality product at an affordable price due to the competitive market that it sets in place between the businesses. Anti-trust laws are needed to continually handle the companies that would get out of control if not for regulations and rules. This paper will discuss the impact of the anti-trust laws that govern competitive business and how they protect the consumer and business from monopolies,…

    • 1184 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Supply is defined as the quantity of a product that a producer is willing and able to supply onto the market at a given price in a given time period. The Law of Supply states that all things being equal, as the price…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays