Corporations continue to use a variety of measures to gauge their financial performance for many years. Economic value added (EVA) has been introduced as a very effective performance measurement and strategic assessment tool. One of the reasons why EVA is such a powerful instrument is that it is linked to market value added (MVA), which is the definite indicator of a company’s wealth creation. Another reason for using EVA is that it is the only dependable and precise continuous improvement method available.
Economic value added is the term that Stern Stewart & Co. coined for its particular variety of economic profit and gain that remains after levying a charge against “After Tax
Operating Profits” for the opportunity cost of all capital used to produce those profits.
Many corporate managers have mistakenly been focusing on conventional accounting profits, which include a deduction for interest payments on debt but have no provision at all for the cost of equity capital.
Market value added measures the level of wealth creation. It beats out all other measures because it is the difference between “Cash In and Cash Out”, i.e., between how much capital investors put into a company and what they could get out by selling at today’s market price. As such, MVA is the cumulative amount by which a company has enhanced or diminished shareholder wealth. It is the best external measure of company performance because it captures the market’s assessment of the effectiveness in how company’s managers have used their resources.
Within the scope of this study, the role of economic value added in financial theory, and the relationship between market value added, market value and economic value added have been investigated. Empirical study around the market value added, market value, economic value added, traditional measures such as net income, earnings per share, return on assets and return on equity have been employed with the data taken from 89