Solutions
Chapter 7 #2
a) The production function in the Solow growth model is Y = f(K,L), or expressed in terms of output per worker, y = f(k). If a war reduces the labor force through casualties, the L falls but
Capital-labor ratio k = K/L rises. The production function tells us that total output falls because there are fewer workers. Output per worker increases, however, since each worker has more capital.
b) The reduction in the labor force means that the capital stock per worker is higher after the war. Therefore, if the economy were in a steady state prior to the war, then after the war the economy has a capital stock that is higher than the steady-state level. This is shown in the figure below as an increase in capital per worker from k1 to k2. As the economy returns to the steady state, the capital stock per worker falls from k2 back to k1, so output per worker also falls. (n+d)k
y = Y/L
y = f(k)
y2 y1 sy
k1
k2
k = K/L
Chapter 7 #4
Suppose the economy begins with an initial steady-state capital stock below the Golden Rule level. The immediate effect of devoting a larger share of national output to investment is that the economy devotes a smaller share to consumption; that is, “living standards” as measured by consumption fall. The higher investment rate means that the capital stock increases more quickly, so the growth rates of output and output per worker rise. The productivity of workers is the average amount produced by each worker – that is, output per worker. So productivity growth rises. Hence, the immediate effect is that living standards fall but productivity growth rises.
In the new steady state, output grows at rate n+g, while output per worker grows at rate g. This means that in the steady state, productivity growth is independent of the rate of investment. Since we begin with an initial steady-state capital stock below the Golden rule level, the higher investment rate means that the new steady state has a higher level of consumption, so living standards are higher
Thus, an increase in the investment rate increases the productivity growth rate in the short run but has no effect in the long run. Living standards, on the other hand, fall immediately and only rise over time. That is, the quotation emphasizes growth, but not the sacrifice required to achieve it.
Chapter 7 #5
As in the text, let k = K/L stand for capital per unit of labor. The equation for the evolution of k is: Δk = Savings – (δ + n)k
The book tells us that this economy consumes all wage income and saves all capital income. That is, in this economy, savings only come from the capital income earned by the owners of capital. If capital earns its marginal product (see problem description), then savings equals MPK x k, which is equivalent to saying that each piece of capital per worker k earns a rent r equal to the MPK.
We can substitute the above into the original equation to find:
Δk = (MPK x k) – (δ + n)k
In the steady state, capital per efficiency unit of capital does not change, so Δk = 0. From the above equation, this tells us that
(MPK x k) = (δ + n)k or MPK = (δ + n)
In this economy’s steady state, the net marginal product of capital, MPK – δ, equals the rate of growth of output, n. But this condition describes the Golden Rule steady state. Hence, we conclude that this economy reaches the Golden Rule level of capital accumulation.
Chapter 8, #2
To solve this problem, it is useful to establish what we know about the U.S. economy:
• A Cobb-Douglas production function has the form y = kα , where α is capital’s share of income. The question tells us that α = 0.3, so we k now that the production function is y = k.3
• In the steady state, we know that the growth rate of output equals 3%, so we know that (n+g) = .03
• The depreciation rate δ = .04
• The capital-output ratio K/Y = 2.5. Because k/y = [K/(LxE)]/[Y/(LxE)] = K/Y, we also know that k/y = 2.5. (That is, the capital-output ratio is the same in terms of effective workers as it is in levels.)
a) Begin with the steady-state condition, sy = (δ + n + g)k. Rewriting this equation leads to a formula for saving in the steady state: s = (δ + n + g)(k/y)
Plugging in the values from above:
The initial saving rate is 17.5%.
s = (0.04 + 0.03)(2.5) = .175
b) We know from Chapter 3 that with a Cobb-Douglas production function, capital’s share of income α = MPK(K/Y). Rewriting, we have:
MPK = α/(K/Y)
Plugging in the values from above: MPK = 0.3/2.5 = .12
c) We know that at the Golden Rule steady state:
MPK = (n + g + d)
Plugging in the values from above: MPK = (.03 + .04) = .07
At the Golden Rule steady state, the marginal product of capital is 7%, whereas it is 12% in the initial steady state. Hence, from the initial steady state we need to increase k to achieve the Golden Rule steady state.
d) We know from Chapter 3 that for a Cobb-Douglas production function,
MPK = α(Y/K). Solving this for the capital-output ratio, we find:
K/Y = α/MPK
We can solve for the Golden Rule capital-output ratio using this equation. If we plug in the value 0.07 for the Golden Rule steady-state MPK, and the value 0.3 for a, we find:
K/Y = 0.3/0.07 = 4.29
In the Golden Rule steady state, the capital-output ratio equals 4.29, compared to the current capital-output ratio of 2.5.
e) We know from part (a) that in the steady state s = (n + g + δ)(k/y) where k/y is the steady-state capital-output ratio. In the introduction to this answer, we showed that k/y = K/Y, and in part (d) we found that the Golden Rule K/Y = 4.29.
Plugging in this value and those established above: s = (0.04 + 0.03)(4.29) = 0.30
To reach the Golden Rule steady-state, the saving rate must rise from 17.5% to 30%.
Chapter 8, #5
How do differences in education across countries affect the Solow Growth Model?
Education is one factor affecting the Efficiency of labor, which we denoted by E. (Other factors affecting the efficiency of labor include levels of health, skill and knowledge.) Since country 1 has a more highly educated labor force than country 2, , each worker in country 1 is more efficient. That is E1>E2. We will assume that both countries are in steady state.
a. In the Solow Growth model, the rate of growth of total income is equal to n+g, which is independent of the work force’s level of education. The two countries will, thus, have the same rate of growth of total income because they have the same rate of population growth and the same rate of technological progress.
b. Because both countries have the same saving rate, the same population growth rate, and the same rate of technological progress, we know that the two countries will converge to the same steady-state level of capital per efficiency unit of labor k*. This is shown in the figure below.
Investment
(δ + n + g)k
sy
k2*
Capital per efficiency unit
Hence, output per efficiency unit of labor in the steady state, which is y* = f(k*) is the same in both countries. But y* = Y/(L*E) or Y/L = y*E. We know that y* will be the same in both countires, but that E1>E2. Therefore y*E1>y*E2. This implies that
(Y/L)1>(Y/L)2. Thus, the level of income per worker will be higher in the country with the more educated labor force.
c. We know that the real rental price of capital r equals the marginal product of capital
(MPK). But the MPK depends on the capital stock per efficiency unit of labor. In the steady state, both countries have k*1 = k*2 = k* because both countries have the same saving rate, the same population growth rate, and the same rate of technological progress.
Therefore, it must be true that r1 = r2 = MPK. Thus, the real rental price of capital is identical in both countries.
d. Output is divided between capital income and labor income. Therefore, the wage per efficiency unit of labor can be expressed as: w = f(k) – MPK * k
As discussed in parts (b) and (c), both countries have the same steady-state capital stock k and the same MPK. Therefore, the wage per efficiency unit in the two countries is equal.
Workers, however, care about the wage per unit of labor, not the wage per efficiency unit. Also, we can observe the wage per unit of labor but not the wage per efficiency unit. The wage per unit of labor is related to the wage per efficiency unit of labor by the equation:
Wage per Unit of L = wE
Thus, the wage per unit of labor is higher in the country with the more educated labor force.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The second stage of production is marked by a slowing in the increase of output. The average and marginal product are declining. This begins at 11 units of labor.…
- 309 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The demand curve of a competitive producer falls because of decreases in MP with increases in the number of workers. TRUE…
- 3910 Words
- 10 Pages
Good Essays -
Proposition 3 There exists a unique steady state of the capital accumulation defined by equation (?) characterized by a level of output \[\begin{align}…
- 533 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Refer to Scenario 14-1. In the short run, which of the following describes the changes that take place in the economy?…
- 982 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
12) Refer to Figure 22-1. Technological change is illustrated in the per-worker production function in the figure above by a movement from…
- 1248 Words
- 5 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Basic Concepts 1. The relationship between the quantity of output (such as wheat, steel, or automobiles) and the quantities of inputs (of labor, land, and capital) is called the production function. Total product is the total output produced. Average product equals total output divided by the total quantity of inputs. We can calculate the marginal product of a factor as the extra output added for each additional unit of input while holding all other inputs constant. 2. According to the law of diminishing returns, the marginal product of each input will generally decline as the amount of that input increases, when all other inputs are held constant. 3. The returns to scale reflect the impact on output of a balanced increase in all inputs. A technology in which doubling all inputs leads to an exact doubling of outputs displays constant returns to scale. When doubling inputs leads to less than double (more than double) the quantity of output, the situation is one of decreasing (increasing) returns to scale. 4. Because decisions take time to implement, and because capital and other factors are often very long lived, the reaction of production may change over different time periods. The short run is a period in which variable factors, such as labor or material inputs, can be easily changed but fixed factors cannot. In the long run, the capital stock (a firm's machinery and factories) can depreciate and be replaced. In the long run, all inputs, fixed and variable, can be adjusted. 5. Technological change refers to a change in the underlying techniques of production, as occurs when a new product or process of production is invented or an old product or process is improved. In such situations, the same output is produced with fewer inputs or more output is produced with the same inputs. Technological change shifts the production function…
- 4703 Words
- 19 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Explore the Robert Solow’s capital deepening model (appendix A, page 186, to chapter 8). Explain what each of the lines represents and why capital deepening must eventually come to an end.…
- 558 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
a. If output is rising and the number of workers is declining, then output per worker must be rising.…
- 485 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
-discuss the role of physical capital in economic growth, the “catch-up” effect and diminishing returns…
- 544 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
| With respect to factors of production, which of the following statements is not true?…
- 1997 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Solow (1956) introduced his version of the neoclassical theory of growth using the production function Y=F(K,AL), where Y is output, K is capital, L is labour, and A is a measure of the level of technology. AL can be seen as the labor force measured in efficiency units, which incorporates both the amount of labor and the productivity of labor as determined by the available technology. Assuming the production function has constant returns to scale, we can write the production function as y=f(k) where y=Y/AL, k=K/AL and f(k)=F(k,1). This production function relates output per effective worker to the amount of capital per effective worker. Ultimately, the neoclassical model emphasizes how growth arises from the accumulation of capital. The capital stock per effective worker, k, evolves according to: dk/dt=sf(k)-(n+g+δ)k, where s is the rate of saving, n is the rate of population growth, g is the rate of growth in technology, δ is the rate at which capital depreciates and dk/dt resembles the change in capital over time t.…
- 1064 Words
- 3 Pages
Better Essays -
Recently, our class was asked to read a economical powerful book called “plunder and Blunder” by Dean Baker, which focuses on the finances of the U.S. economy after World War Two. He evaluates the concept that the economies productivity increased rapidly from 1947-1973. Baker quotes, “To appreciate the magnitude of this growth, consider the following: if we maintained the same rate of productivity growth in the United States experienced in the early postwar era, we would be able to take an additional 24 weeks of vacation each year, or reduce our average workweek to 21 hours, and still have the same income in 2030 as we do today”. Baker states such opinion because in the post war era, the average workers salaries were increasing, thus putting more money in people’s pockets. This also resulted in more purchasing, and productivity of business and the economy all around. I for one can definitely agree that with an increase in wages, comes an increase in economical growth.…
- 2170 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays -
(a) Do the two production functions in Problem 1 obey the law of diminishing returns?…
- 306 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
It should be noted that areas of the economy have rising productivity. In this regard, such sectors produce more with less. It leads to rising living standards and increasing wages. On the other hand, other areas such as education find it harder to increase productivity. The institutions of higher learning have to spend more money trying to increase productivity.…
- 1397 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Assume a production function with constant returns to scale, labor's share of income at 0.7, and capital's share at 0.3. If labor grows at 4% and capital grows at 3%, how many years would it take to double the current level of output if no technological advances are made?…
- 1461 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays