Preview

Educational and Social Reforms of Peter the Great.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1162 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Educational and Social Reforms of Peter the Great.
Educational and Social reforms of Peter the Great.
From January 1, 1700, Peter the Great introduced a new chronology, making the Russian calendar conform to European usage with regard to the year, which in Russia had hitherto been numbered “from the Creation of the World” and had begun on September 1 (he adhered however to the Julian Old Style as opposed to the Gregorian New Style for the days of the month). In 1710 the Old Church Slavonic alphabet was modernized into a secular script. Peter was the first ruler of Russia to sponsor education on secular lines and to bring an element of state control into that field. Various secular schools were opened; and since too few pupils came from the nobility, the children of soldiers, officials, and churchmen were admitted to them. In many cases, compulsory service to the state was preceded by compulsory education for it. Russians were also permitted to go abroad for their education and indeed were often compelled to do so (at the state's expense). The translation of books from western European languages was actively promoted. The first Russian newspaper, Vedomosti (“Records”), appeared in 1703. The Russian Academy of Sciences was instituted in 1724. Beside his useful measures, Peter often enforced superficial Europeanization rather brutally; for example, when he decreed that beards should be shorn off and Western dress worn. He personally cut the beards of his boyars and the skirts of their long coats (kaftany). The Raskolniki (Old Believers) and merchants who insisted on keeping their beards had to pay a special tax, but peasants and the Orthodox clergy were allowed to remain bearded.
Unlike all earlier Russian tsars, whose Byzantine splendors he repudiated, he was very simple in his manners; for example, he enjoyed conversation over a mug of beer with shipwrights and sailors from the foreign ships visiting St. Petersburg. Restless, energetic, and impulsive, he did not like splendid clothes that hindered his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Peter the Great-built up czar contol; son of alexis;6 feet 8 inches; went to the west incognito to seek western allies for crusade against Turkish power in Europe; autocrat; attacked the ottoman empire but won no great victories; warred with Sweden and gained territory; Western organizational principles; well-defined military hierarchy; new training institutes for aspiring bureaucrats and officers; eliminated the old noble councils; made all nobility cut off their beards. Westernization was meant to encourage autocratic state.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolute Monarchs were eithere kings or queens who controlled the complete way of life in the country they ruled. Absolutism is the rule of one person over any given thing. The two rulers that showed absolutism in the documents are Louis 14th and Peter the Great. They were both absolute monarchs and both ruled over large territories.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Peter I was tsar of Russia from 1682 until 1725. He introduced significant changes in…

    • 3006 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As well as this, Universities came under Government control. This meant that University students could not spread anti-Tsarist ideas as they were brainwashed that Tsarism was the best. In 1881, Pobedonestev enforced orthodoxy, this together with the censorship of many newspapers prevented the spread of anti-Tsarist ideas and ideals of democracy failed to reach people in Russia. An example of this is that Herzen’s book ‘The Bell’ was banned in Russia due to its anti-Tsarist ideas but was still smuggled in.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Finally, Peter also made Russia more culturally respectable in Western eyes. He slightly promoted the status of women in society and encouraged women to wear Western-style clothing to social functions. These small reforms, however, were mainly aimed at upper-class women and he made no move to change gender relations.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    nation. In order to become a true absolute ruler Louis xiv needed to make sure…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1629, a young and determined prince named Peter Alexeyevich Romanov took the crown of Russia. However, Peter inherited a state where the real power was held by a large group of traditional landowning elite, known as the boyard nobility. After a weak rule by Michael Romanov and his son, who was backed up by the nobility, the traditional Russian service system was breaking down, as the nobility attempted to avoid duty in the army. As a result, the whole country was in decay and the army in tatters. Peter the Great, however, decided to reverse the trend and decided to consolidate what little power was given to him by his weak predecessors. In an attempt to make Russia a great Baltic power, Peter the Great would permanently change the Russian military and the social structure of his country…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia, under the reign of the young Tsar Peter, was westernized and modernized almost in the wink of an eye. Peter the Great visited Europe, and worked hard to learn and bring back every bit of technology and wisdom possessed by the western part of the world. Throughout his reign he brought Russia up from the proverbial dumps, and placed it among the world powers throughout the known world. Not only did he use his intelligence and determination to put Russia in this position, but also his natural ability to command and lead armies into battle.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter The Great Influence

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The reign of Peter the Great had a great impact on the Russian Orthodox Church. Peter did not particularly like the Russian Orthodox Church, he saw the church as backwards and still using their traditions which Peter did not like. He also saw the Church as rival to his power. The patriarch’s constant ceremonial presence, pretensions to co-sovereignty, and network of subordinate bishoprics and monasteries evoked an aura of theocracy. For many years the church operated autonomously, but this changed under Peter. When the senior bishop of the Russian Orthodox Church died in 1700 Peter did not appoint a new one. In 1721 Peter replaced the patriarch with a college of the monarch’s clerical appointees dubbed the Holy Synod and assisted by Senate…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II’s lack of military experience and inability to rule the throne all together, additionally contributed to the devastating outcome of WW1 on Russia. “A quick intelligence, a cultivated mind, method and industry in his work, an extraordinary charm that attracted all who came near him- the Emperor Nicholas had not inherited his father’s commanding personality nor the strong character and prompt decision which are so essential to an autocratic ruler...” stated Sir G. Buchanan, British ambassador to Russia in 1910, emphasizes how the urban lower classes were not the only ones unsatisfied with the Tsar Nicholas…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Firstly,they were both autocrats,in that all decisions of state had to be approved by them.Secondly,they both wanted to curb the power of an ambitious nobility.However,they achieved this aim differently; Louis made his court at Versailles the centre of power,so the nobility had to spend all their time there if they wanted to have any influence.This kept them away from their own provincial power bases,making it hard for them to plot against the king.Peter on the other hand tortured and murdered any nobles he suspected of disloyalty.The main difference between the two was that Louis was ruling a cultural advanced,modern state - Russia under Peter was still very backward compared to major European states,so Peter worked hard to modernize Russia.Finally,both built up strong armies and used them for territorial expansion, thus increasing the prestige of their countries. Firstly,they were both autocrats,in that all decisions of state had to be approved by them.Secondly,they both wanted to curb the power of an ambitious nobility.However,they achieved this aim differently; Louis made his court at Versailles the centre of power,so the nobility had to spend all their time there if they wanted to have any influence.This kept them away from their own provincial power bases,making it hard for them to plot against the king.Peter on the other hand tortured and murdered any nobles he suspected of disloyalty.The main difference between the two was that Louis was ruling a cultural advanced,modern state - Russia under Peter was still very backward compared to major European states,so Peter worked hard to modernize Russia.Finally,both built up strong armies and used them for territorial expansion, thus increasing the prestige of their…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chadwick, N.K. 1946. "The Beginning of Russian History, An Enquiry into Sources." London, Great Britian: Cambridge University Press Ltd.…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    From 1638-1786, there were three absolute monarchs. Louis XIV, the sun king, built a splendid court at Versailles where he looked over the nobles. Peter the Great, the westernizer, changed Russia from a backward country into a great power. Finally, Frederick the Great, the enlightened despot, was full of tolerance and restraint and had good views on government. He improved Prussia many ways.…

    • 797 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nicholas II Research

    • 3161 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Source 13: “Nicholas’ problem was that he could understand many points of view and wavered between them … his personality meant that he was not very good at exercising it.” From Nicholas II, Emperor of All the Russians, by Dominic Lieven, 1994.…

    • 3161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Vygotsky's Theory

    • 5640 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Vygotsky began teaching in his home city almost immediately after the 1917 Communist Revolution. However, he was disappointed if he anticipated that this upheaval would result in greater overall freedom. The ascension of Joseph Stalin to power in 1922 meant that all of Vygotsky 's scholarly work was to be accomplished in an ever more repressive police state.…

    • 5640 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays