Preview

Edward Kopin Biography

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1158 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Edward Kopin Biography
WHere history meets legend: Medieval English Royal Families
Edward II
The Linchpin of England

Zain Mobeen

Edward II: The Linchpin of England Between the strong reigns of his father Edward I and son Edward III, the reign of Edward II was considered by some to be disastrous for England. With military defeats and incompetence, his reign is known as being unsuccessful. His choices were problematic amongst his peers and colleagues. This was due to his playing of bias and favoritism towards Gascon knight Piers Gaveston and later English lord Hugh Despenser. The ongoing war with Scotland, which was inherited from his father, continued to be the cause of many problems and seemed to hit him at the worst moments. The Great Famine of 1315 also
…show more content…
In the spring of 1315, unusually heavy rain began in much of Europe. Throughout the spring and summer, it continued to rain and the temperature remained cool. These conditions caused widespread crop failures. The straw and hay for the animals could not be cured and there was no feed for the livestock. The price of food began to rise and food prices in England doubled between spring and midsummer. While many will say it was a natural disaster that could have happened to anyone, many people at the time believed it was an act of God punishing Edward II for the wrong choices he made for the country. England back then was very religious so this idea was the norm to believe.
In the end of the day, Edward II’s can be debated both ways. While my opinion is clear, it can be seen both ways. Whether or not the pressure from Scotland and the Great Famine of 1315 influenced his terrible decisions, or whether his choices were subjective due to his close relationship with Gaveston, his reign resulted in the downfall of England nonetheless. He may have had good intentions but playing favorites which resulted in his government to go against him, wars, and natural tragedies proved his reign to be tragic.
Works Cited
"EDWARD I." EDWARD I. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 Feb. 2013.
"Edward II." : The Great Famine, 1315 to 1317. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 Feb. 2013.
"Edward II." Edward II. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 Feb.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Edward IV died suddenly and very unexpectedly. Nobody was prepared for his death and so when he died, nobody knew what to do. Edward V was a minor at the time, and so this meant he could not rule alone. He was only 12 and so would need either a council to govern for him, or a protector. Whoever adopted these roles would essentially be in control of England. Edward IV was well liked during his second reign as King, and so his death threw the country into chaos. Edward V was not in England and so he was not very well located and it took several days for him to receive the news. There was a lot of uncertainty as to what should happen following his death, and the fact that he left two different sets of insturctions only confused things further.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    7. nnocent Annulling the Magna Carta from The Letters of Pope Innocent III (1198-1216), Concerning England and Wales edited and translated by Christopher R. Cheney and Mary G. Cheney, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967), pp. 212-16…

    • 2243 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The actions of the Scottish kingdom towards Edward I and England within the time period of 1286 – 1292 has provided a basis of great scrutiny and speculation over the years. With the death of Alexander III, Scotland was plunged into a Succession Crisis, from which a guardianship was formed to provide governance over the kingdom of Scotland. During the time following Alexander III's death, Edward I became an influential and involved constituent towards this guardianship. However, can the Scottish kingdom's decision to involve the King of England in the country's affairs be perceived as an act of naivety or was it a piece of sensible pragmatism? Furthermore, in events such as the Treaties of both Birgham and Salisbury, along with those of the Great Cause and election of John Balliol as King of Scots, all including Edward I's presence, it is possible that the kingdom of Scotland blindingly accepted the aid of their most powerful neighbour without truly considering the English king's own intentions.…

    • 2792 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1470 Edward IV’s rule was challenged by the former monarch that he had usurped, Henry VI, and one of the key reasons as to why he was able to overcome this challenge was due to his popularity as king. Edward had proved to be an able king who was also young, strong and handsome, which is severely juxtaposed to the monarch he had usurped, as Henry VI was old, a less than capable ruler and thought to be insane. This meant that not only his original usurpation of Henry in 1461 was considered more acceptable to England’s population as it was most likely going to better the country; it also meant that Henry’s usurpation of Edward in 1470 was especially unfavourable with the population. Another reason why Edward was able to overcome his challenge of usurpation was at that time France was very unpopular with England, which is unsurprising as it is said that ‘England’s national hobby was going to war with France’, and Henry VI’s wife, Margaret of Anjou was the French kings niece. This marriage alone would be enough to make Edward appear more favourable with the general population; however it seemed likely that if Edward had not usurped, an alliance between the two countries would proceed, which only served to support Edward’s campaign to get back on the throne. Nonetheless, the most damaging factor to the position of the opposition is most likely the circumstances that the Lancastrian house found themselves in as with the deaths of both their key supporter, the Earl of Warwick, at the Battle of Barnet and of the Lancastrian heir, Edward, Prince of Wales at Tewkesbury, the Lancastrian position was no longer considered viable. The popularity of Edward IV was not repeated with Richard III however, and this combined with the fact he usurped a king that was showing great…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with this view that Henry VIII was responsible for the English foreign policy failures in the years 1509-1529, and this is because he was too keen to establish his presence in international affairs and believed that he had to demonstrate his strengths to his subjects. This way of thought was due to his peaceful rise to the throne and because of his confident personality; Henry wanted to win victories on the battlefield and wanted to establish his image of a Renaissance warrior.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 3 ]. 1 Barbara Rosenwein, A Short History of the Middle Ages, (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009), 263-267…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trade Vs Manorialism

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The lack of trade wasn't really a worry for people then though, considering that the manors were self sufficient and produced any goods necessary to live, this economic system was called manorialism. All the new established routes carved by the crusaders made a great base to begin trade once again and for the first time since the fall of the Roman Empire, trade was resurrected. Due to the crusades, and the cultural diffusion that came with it, trade kick started back up. Crusaders brought luxury goods from Asia and the Arabian peninsula back to Europe. Eventually, merchants needed a more formal place to trade and took their goods to large cities and villages, because of this, both villages and towns grew simultaneously. Manorialism and feudalism were practically wiped out, not right away but slowly. Trade boomed in places like Italy, because they were by the sea. The revival of trade and growth of towns directly benefited the monarchs. Growing trade was great for kings because it meant they would tax the incoming and outgoing goods and make more MONEY. Aside from money, the middle class favored the king because he protected trade. This was good for the king because he ultimately had more support and power over his people if they liked him. For nobles though, it wasn't as great. Since the middle class favored the king, the middle class was no…

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wolsey had always caused resentment from the nobility, and this only grew as he became more dominant in Henry VIII’s government. Not only did nobles dislike him due to his low birth contrasted with his high positions, such as becoming Lord Chancellor in 1515, but resentment was also caused by his lavish lifestyle. Although opposition against him had got stronger throughout his career, this in itself was not significant enough to cause his fall. It was a factor that undoubtedly would’ve swayed Henry, however the ultimate reason for Wolsey’s fall was the failure to annul Henry’s marriage to Catherine of Aragon.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the War of the Roses, England was constantly in a state of war between the House of Lancaster and the House of York, who were massive rivals that competed for the throne of England (History 320 Lecture, 10/30/2015). In Polydore Vergil’s account of Henry VII, Richard III’s personal ambition can be seen. The author first tells of a nightmare Richard has the night before Bosworth Field, which Vergil believes was “no dream but a conscience guilty of heinous offences, a conscience, I say” (Polydore Vergil, Account of Henry VII, 479). Though the source makes no explicit mentions of it, it is widely believed that Richard III murdered his nephews to take the throne. When his brother, Edward IV died, his legitimate son was crowned Edward V, but was shortly taken captive by his uncle and placed into the Tower of London (History 320 Lecture, 10/30/2015). Instead of allowing for a legitimate heir to take the throne as it should have gone, Richard went to immeasurable lengths to ensure he would be king, further escalating the conflict and disrupting English society as a whole. This caused not only great scandal, but Richard III was a terrible king, guilty of many offenses as Vergil states. He created great disruption not only in his court by taking the throne away from his nephew, but also to the lives of his subjects. Vergil makes note of this as well, specifically mentioning the strife of the English people, who had consistently been “torn by rival factions” (Polydore Vergil, Account of Henry VII,…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When people lose their dignity, they also lose a part of the very thing that makes them human. Despair, hopelessness, fear and apathy are all ways a human can lose their humanity. The eyes provide a window onto the soul, and thus a view on the person's mental state. The eyes also function in reverse, as a symbolic gesture of control over someone. All of this is present in Night, by Elie Wiesel, an account of human tragedy, human cruelty, human dignity, and the loss thereof.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    (16) P. Boissonnade, Life and Work in Medieval Europe (Fifth to Fifteenth Centuries), London: Routledge & Kegan, 1937. pp.249, 250…

    • 2490 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Describe a topic you have explored in depth in this History 1302 course and include little-known information you have discovered to support your interest in the subject.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without the chaos in Europe during the fourteenth century, Europe would not have become a newly unified power. Famine, cold, wet, and deadly conditions set place in Europe during the middle ages. Poor leadership and unlucky sequences caused the massive economic/political meltdown in Europe and the consequences were immensely costly to the general population for more than a 100 years. Northern Europe endured a large economic turnaround during the Little Ice Age because they heavily relied on agriculture. Agriculture became a growing concern due to the cold weather and the lack of production caused shortages which resulted in The Great Famine. The lack of food caused the prices to rise and since the general population already suffered from the appalling economy, they could not afford the prices which made them resort to violence and disturbing food selections. Disease from Asia mainly known as the Black Plague riddled Northern Europe causing a large population decrease and a change in balance of power.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first disaster to hit Europe was famine. Some of the agricultural success of the High Middle Ages had been due to improved weather conditions, what's called the Medieval Warm Period (800-1300). Around 1300, Europe begins to cool off, and there is the beginning of what is called the Little Ice Age (1300-1870). Bad weather conditions meant bad harvests, particularly in 1315, 1316, and 1317. Harvests were so bad farmers ended up eating their seed corn, and, with no seed to plant, future harvests weren't going to be much good either. Food shortages led to widespread malnutrition, increased vulnerability to disease, and shorter life expectancy.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bubonic Plague Analysis

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages

    During 1339 in Europe, the population was beginning to exceed the month of food available. The winters ere extremely…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays