One does not necessarily have to read the book that Bever is critiquing in order to get the jist of it; however, I would have to say that this might have been a confusing read for an individual who did not have any previous knowledge about possession or exorcisms (specifically if one does not know what an exorcism is). Another weakness to this piece I would have have to say is the Bever seems as if he is almost attacking Levack’s claims directly, but is sometimes unclear as to why he
One does not necessarily have to read the book that Bever is critiquing in order to get the jist of it; however, I would have to say that this might have been a confusing read for an individual who did not have any previous knowledge about possession or exorcisms (specifically if one does not know what an exorcism is). Another weakness to this piece I would have have to say is the Bever seems as if he is almost attacking Levack’s claims directly, but is sometimes unclear as to why he