Preview

EEOC Presentation Paper

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1368 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
EEOC Presentation Paper
EEOC Sues AutoZone for Race Discrimination
Nicole Fredrickson
Soc 315
August 11, 2014
Nancy Cupp
EEOC Sues AutoZone for Race Discrimination

Throughout the United States history, there has been a large amount of discrimination in the workplace and no laws to protect employees. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin. If an employee feels they have been a victim of employment discrimination they can file a charge or claim with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) (Contributors, 2014). EEOC strives to protect employees that are not treated fairly by other employees or companies. After a complaint has been filed with EEOC, they will handle all the claims by following common procedures and follow all rules and regulations to ensure all cases are handled the same.
A Chicago automotive parts retail chain AutoZone, Inc, violated federal laws when it forced a black sales manager to transfer out of a store on the southwest side of Chicago because of his race, then fired him for resisting (EEOC, 2014). The black manager was forced to transfer to a different store because in 2012 AutoZone managers decided to limit the number on non-Hispanic employees working in that particular store. EEOC District Director John Rowe revealed that the employer appeared to believe Hispanic customers that came to the store would prefer to be served by Hispanic employees (EEOC, 2014). It is also illegal for employers to base employment decisions on customer's discriminatory preferences.
AutoZone or any company cannot transfer an employee because of their race and then fire them for not accepting the transfer. AutoZone wanted to transfer the manager to a store that was across town. Customer preference is not an excuse for discrimination, and if the customer is not happy working with certain employees because of their race then, the customers can shop at another location. It is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is an agency of the Federal Government created to handle all types of employment discrimination and to ensure that equal opportunity is given to employees. In the case of EEOC vs Waffle House, I was glad to see that the EEOC’s stepped in and file a suit against Waffle House for violating the ADA. I feel that it was very unfair that Baker was terminated due to he had a seizure at work, but I was happy to see that the EEOC trumped the arbitration at the end.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts of the Case: In early 2000, an African-American name James Daniel, Jr applied for an Executive Team Leader position with Target. He was given tests, which he passed placing him in a very high percentile of those who have been previously tested. Unfortunately he was not hired, and was given the explanation of not meeting the requirements of the position. Daniels did not receive any feedback as to what requirement he was meeting in the interviewing process. Later three other African-American applicants, Kalisa White, Ralpheal Edgeston and Cherise Brown inquired about the same position involving contact with the Store Team Leader Matthew Armiger. White sent her resume and called to schedule an…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Michael Harrison Jr. the plaintiff filed a complaint with the EEOC against the defendant Killeen Fast- Food Restaurant (Wendy’s) for refusal to hire him based on his hearing impairment despite his qualifications. The EEOC filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas Waco Division, the general manager of the restaurant refused to hire…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Secondly, I think that the Tennessee Valley Authority should have really sat down and analyze each candidate that was applying for the ten positions. With this company only have a select ten positions available the hiring managers should have been very specific with the candidates that should be chosen. They should have compared and contrasts the advantages and disadvantages of each candidate upon calling them to set up an interview. They should have taken some time to look at each application to cross out the ones that did not meet the characteristic that were initially brought about. Race should not have ever been a factor and seeking candidates to fill all ten open positions. Regardless of anyone’s race the job still has to be completed. Everyone should have been given a fair chance for any position available. They could have also given everyone a trial period to let their performance speak for itself. I think that each candidate should have been given a fair opportunity to be rewarded with a job with Tennessee Valley Authority. So many companies try to use and abuse you as long as you will let them; Dunlap felt that he had an equal chance to get hired on with this company in which he had been…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    "It shall be an unlawful employment practice for any employer, labor organization, or joint labor¬-management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining, including on ¬the ¬job training programs to discriminate against any individual because of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in admission to, or employment in, any program established to provide apprenticeship or other training (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 1964)."…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The legal issue in this case is about David Dunlap the plaintiff who has been faced with discrimination on the basis of race in the interview at Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) during the employment process of this company. Mr. Dunlap is an African American man whom has worked for many years as foreman through contract for the union. He has worked as a contractor with the union at Tennessee Authority as a boiler man for over twenty years including fifteen years as a foreman. He has applied for employment at TVA numerous times since 1970 and was not once offered an interview. Mr. Dunlap has established that regardless of experience and during the hiring development, the company has allowed racial favoritism. The court has to recognize if the business is legally responsible under title VII of the civil rights act of 1964 for racial bias with intent. Mr. Dunlap has claimed the case under disparate impact and disparate treatment investigation. (Walsh, 2010)…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The EEOC carries out its work at headquarters and in 50 field offices throughout the United States. Individuals who believe they have been discriminated against in employment begin the processes by filing administrative charges. Individual Commissioners may also initiate charges that the law has been violated. Through the investigation of charges, if the EEOC determines there is "reasonable cause" to believe that discrimination has occurred, it must then seek to conciliate the charge to reach a voluntary resolution between the charging party and the respondent. If conciliation is not successful, the EEOC may bring suit in federal court. Whenever the EEOC concludes its processing of a case, or earlier upon the request of a charging party, it issues a "notice of right to sue" which enables the charging party to bring an individual action in court.…

    • 4069 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    | |discrimination based on race, |of people” put of a particular job was| |origin. The EEOC could file civil |…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On September 2011, the EEOC filed a federal lawsuit against the Missouri-based shop in Houston federal court claiming that Bass Pro Shops knowingly and systematically discriminated against Hispanics and Black applicants in hiring and that some of the mangers used racial slurs (Forsyth, 2011). Bass Pro Shops told Reuters “that the complaints stem from the stereotype that people who like outdoor sports are racist redneck” (Forsyth, 2011 pg. 1). Not only is this lawsuit claiming that Bass Pro Shop has been discriminating in their hiring since 2005, it also states that Bass Pro unlawfully destroyed or failed to keep records and documents related to employment applications and internal discrimination complaints (Bass Pro Failed, 2011).…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based on Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 employers are not allowed to discriminate against a potential employee based on race, color, sex, religion, or national origin. In the Dunlap v. Tennessee Valley Authority case this title of the civil rights act was violated. An African American man named David Dunlap who gave almost the exact same answers as white candidates who got the job and who had 20 years of experience in boiler making was not chosen for any of the 10 positions available with the TVA. The issue is not only that he wasn’t hired but based on the score sheet he was highly discriminated against. When asked how many days he missed Dunlap told the employers that he never missed days unless sick or having a family emergency, two other candidates who just so happened to be white gave almost the exact same answer. On the score sheet for this question Dunlap was given a score of 3.7 while the other two potential employees were given scores of 4.2 and 5.5. Also when he was asked about how many accidents he had in the field he replied none and was given a low score but another candidate whom had at least two accidents was given a higher score than Dunlap. The issue at hand was that, his score sheet was heavily manipulated putting him in number 14 out of the 21 candidates that had applied. The top ten got hired.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A comparison of the EEOC press release to the chosen news item. What accounts for the differences?…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or EEOC enforces federal laws in regards to discrimination against employees and job applicants alike for businesses of 20 or more employees. Employers are not allowed to discriminate based on race, color, sex, religion, disabilities, age or genetic information (Editorial Board, 2011). They also investigate complaints of sexual harassment. The EEOC was established through the Civil Rights Act of 1964. There are many laws that have to followed by the human resource departments and are overlooked by the EEOC, for instance, using words in a job advertisement that could in any way discourage some people from applying, recruiting in ways that could be seen as discriminating, how a hiring manager decides on who to hire for a job if there could be a conflict, for instance at the City of Charlotte we take bids for…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Employers must understand that the persons who evaluate and decide the outcome of employment discrimination cases (the EEOC investigator, federal or state judge, and/or jury) have keen senses of fairness and expect that employees will be treated in a fair manner. As a result, employers are exposed to substantial liability for any acts, including perceived acts, of discrimination in the workplace. Employers should take any charge of discrimination seriously and the employer must keep in mind that, at a minimum, it needs to have a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for taking the action in question. In addition, an employer's response will be evaluated by persons who have a different perspective than the employer. What…

    • 964 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) may take action when an investigation shows that there has been a violation in a person’s civil rights just because of his or her attributes.…

    • 2010 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Several associated New York Pizzerias are required to pay 50,000 dollars to Hispanic Employees, resulting from a national origin discrimination lawsuit. Antonella's Restaurant & Pizzeria, Inc. Displayed acts discriminated against their Hispanic employees. Demanding they speak in English without out having just cause for the request. They also subjected the employees to racial slurs, and hostilities because of their nationality. These acts were in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In our present work place, all employees are entitled to function in a stress free, nonhazardous environment. Antonella's Restaurant & Pizzeria, Inc. has a responsibility to provide such environment to their employees regardless of nationality.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays