Preview

Effect of Matherial Weaknesses on Stock Exchange Market

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
11617 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Effect of Matherial Weaknesses on Stock Exchange Market
EFFECTS OF MATERIAL WEAKNESS ON STOCK EXCHANGE MARKET
The impact of Sarbanes Oxley Act in companies’ share price

Ronnie Damonte

Month Year

School of Business Administration

TABLE OF CONTENTS:

1. INTRODUCTION 3
1.1 Background Information. 3
1.2 Objectives of the Research. 3
1.2 Research Questions. 4
1.3 Methods. 4 2. SARBANES OXLEY ACT 5
2.1 What is the “Sarbanes Oxley Act”? 5
2.2 SOX genesis. 5 2.2.1 Toward the SOX. 5 2.2.2 The development of SOX bill. 6
2.3 Structure and contents of Sarbanes Oxley Act. 8 2.3.1 - 100s Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. 8 2.3.2 - 200s Auditor Independence. 8 2.3.3 – 300s Behavior and Compensation of CEO, CFO and professional advisors. 9 2.3.4 – 400s Disclosure Rules. 11 2.3.5 – 500s Conflicts of Analyst Interest. 12 2.3.6 – 600s Funding; 800, 900, 1100s Disciplining Transgressors. 13
2.4 SOX Section 404. 13 2.4.1 Overview of Section 404. 13 2.4.2 Internal Auditor Role in Section 404. 14 2.4.3 Definition of deficiencies in internal control system. 15
2.5 Market reactions after SOX. 16 3. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RESEARCH 18
3.1 Selection of the study sample. 18
3.2 Research methodology. 21 3.2.1 Average variation analysis. 21 3.2.2 Gaussian distribution analysis. 22 4. EMPIRICAL TEST AND RESULTS 27
4.1 Introduction. 27
4.2 Results of the average variation analysis. 28 4.2.1 Calculation of the company stock trend. 28 4.2.3 Calculation of the average variation. 29
4.3 Results of the Gaussian distribution analysis for the entire sample. 32
4.4 Results of the Gaussian distribution analysis applied to the type of industry. 35 4.4.1 Automotive and transport. 35 4.4.2 Construction. 36 4.4.3 Consumer product manufacturers. 37 4.4.4 Consumer services. 38 4.4.5 Electronics. 39 4.4.6 Energy and utilities. 40 4.4.7 Financial services. 41 4.4.8 Industrial manufacturing. 42 4.4.9 Media. 43 4.4.10 Pharmaceutical. 44
4.5 Results of the Gaussian



References: Anne M. Marchetti, 2005, Beyond Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance: Effective Enterprise Risk Management, Wiley. Alan D. Morrison, 2004, Sarbanes Oxley, Corporate Governance and Operational Risk, Sarbanes-Oxford Seminar, University of Oxford. Barbara Pacini & Meri Raggi, 2005, Statistica per l’analisi operativa dei dati, Feltrinelli. Cohen, Daniel A., Aiyesha Dey, and Thomas Z. Lys, 2005, Trends in earnings management and informativeness of earnings announcements in the pre- and post-Sarbanes Oxley periods, Working paper, New York University. Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies ("FAS No. 5"), Deloitte FAQ, 2005. Financial Executive International (FEI), 2004. Section 404 costs survey. Financial Reporting Council, 2004, The Turnbull guidance as an evaluation framework for the purposes of Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Guy P. Lander, 2004, What is Sarbanes-Oxley? Mc Graw Hill. KPMG LLP, 2004. Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404: An overview of the PCAOB’s requirements. Holmstrom, B. and S. Kaplan, 2003. The state of U.S. Corporate governance: What’s right and what’s wrong? Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 15, 8-20. Leftwich, R., 1981. Evidence of the impact of mandatory changes in accounting principles on corporate loan agreements. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3, 3-36. Li, H., M. Pincus, and S. Rego, 2004. Market reaction to events surrounding the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Working paper, University of Iowa. Michael F. Holt, 2006, The Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Overview and Implementation Procedures Manual, CIMA Publishing. Protiviti Inc., 2003, Guide to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Internal Control Reporting Requirements, www.protivity.com. Robert A Prentice, 2004, Guide to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act: What Business Needs to Know Now That it is Implemented, South-Western College/West. Robert Charles Clark, 2005, Corporate governance changes in the wake if the Sarbanes Oxley Act, Discussion Paper, University of Harvard. Scott Green, 2004, Sarbanes-Oxley and the Board of Directors: Techniques and Best Practices for Corporate Governance, Wiley. State University of New York, http://www.oswego.edu/ Zhang, Economic Consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 2005, Working Paper, University of Rochester. Bryan-Low, 2003. Securities Threat: Bush Crackdown on Business Fraud Signals New Era. Wall Street Journal, October 08, 2003. Day, K. and A.B. Crenshaw, 2002. SEC, Accounting Firms Redrafting Audit Rules; Agency Chairman Draws Fire for Role in Effort. The Washington Post, January 16, 2002. Day, K. and K. Williams, 2002. CEO Deadline Brings Some Restatements; Accounting Certifications Overload SEC Staff. The Washington Post, August 15, 2002. Hamburger, T., 2002. House Committee Postpones Vote on Oversight of Auditors. Wall Street Journal, April 12, 2002. Hilzenrath, D.S., 2002. Hill Begins Search for Compromise on Accounting Rules. The Washington Post, July 20, 2002. Hilzenrath, D.S. and H. Dewar, 2002. Senate Votes 97-0 TO Rein In Firms; Bill Targets Auditors and Executives. The Washington Post, July 16, 2002. Hilzenrath, D.S., J. Weisman, and J. Vandehei, 2002. How Congress Rode a ‘Storm’ to Corporate Reform. The Washington Post, July 28, 2002. Hitt, Gregg, 2002. Democrats in Senate Unite on Accounting-Overhaul Bill. Wall Street Journal, June 11, 2002. Norris, F., 2004. Too Much Regulation? Corporate Bosses Sing the Sarbanes-Oxley Blues. New York Times, January 23, 2004. Schroeder, M., 2002. Lawmakers Plan More Financial Oversight – Accounting Industry Faces Stepped-up Regulation and Limits on Services. Wall Street Journal, February 12, 2002. Schroeder, M., 2002. Senate Panel Seeks Sweeping Change for Auditors. Wall Street Journal, March 7, 2002. Schroeder, M., 2002. The Economy: Congress Seeks Harsher Penalties For Violations of Accounting Laws. Wall Street Journal, April 23, 2002. Schroeder, M., 2003. SEC proposes Rules to Strengthen Boards. Wall Street Journal, January 9, 2003. Solomon, D., 2003. Fraud Detector: SEC Sets a New Rule Aimed at Companies’ Internal Controls. Wall Street Journal, May 28, 2003. Solomon, D., 2006. Why does material weaknesses do not crash the market? Wall Street Journal, June 25, 2006. VandeHei, J., 2002. House GOP’s Leaders Fight Audit Plan; Lawmakers Seek to Dilute Some Senate-Passed Reforms. The Washington Post, July 17, 2002. VandeHei, J. and D.S., Hilzenrath, 2002. Hill Leaders Agree on Corporate Curbs; Attack on Fraud Includes Auditing Control and Jail Terms. The Washington Post, July 25, 2002. Wallison, P., 2003. Blame Sarbanes-Oxley. Wall Street Journal, September 3, 2003.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Sarbanes-Oxley now clearly places responsibility on corporate executives for the content of a company's financial reports issued to investors. Executives must certify that they have reviewed the reports and that the reports contain no materially false statements or omissions. Financial reports must not be misleading; they must impart a clear and accurate portrayal of the company's financial condition. Although executives don’t need to draft the reports, they must implement and monitor internal controls that affect their preparation.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Acc291Individual Paper

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) was created in response to the series of misleading and fraudulent activities of publicly traded big business’s in the 1990s. During this time, multiple large publicly-traded businesses increased their stock prices by “publishing false or deceptive financial statements” (Lasher, 2008, p. 187). The most publicly charged company was Enron, which was then followed by Xerox, WorldCom and Global Crossing. This resulted in millions of dollars of stock market value disappearing in what seemed to be overnight. It is in response to these events that Congress drafted and passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sarbanes Oxley Memo

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hein, M. (2002). The Sarbanes Oxley act of 2002 effects sweeping changes to the U.S. federal securities laws. Retrieved on August 21, 2005, from www. www.gtlaw.com.…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Sarbanes Oxley Act

    • 3132 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Financial reporting has been dissected over and over again by legislation. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) hold the key to providing protection and integrity when companies are submitting their financial statements. Although their mission is to provide order and efficiency for financial markets, insidious plans are still developed by companies which ultimately result in turmoil to the economy. To provide a safeguard to investors, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was passed by congress in 2002, which was constructed because of fraudulent acts of well-known companies such as Enron. Before the SOX was inaugurated, two sets of accounting rules were used as guides for CPA firms.…

    • 3132 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nogler, G., & Inwon, J. (2011, May/June). Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Was the ’one-size-fits-all’ approach justified? Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance (Wiley), 22(4), 65-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.20691…

    • 502 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sox Act

    • 2419 Words
    • 10 Pages

    United States., & LexisNexis (Firm). (2002). The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: With analysis. Newark, NJ: LexisNexis/Matthew Bender.…

    • 2419 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I have written this report in order to fulfill my graduation requirements at Southwestern College. Also to become more knowledgeable on the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) and the impact it has had on the business world.…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Congress responded by enacting the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”), which became effective on July 30, 2002. Sarbanes-Oxley makes many changes in the securities regulation process to improve corporate governance and reporting. It imposes harsh penalties on violators, creates an elaborate system for governing and regulating auditors for public companies, and requires the securities industry’s self-regulatory organizations to adopt rules to prevent conflicts of interest and enhance the independence of securities analysts. Even casual observers of the political reaction to the stunning disclosures about Enron, WorldCom and Tyco’s deceitful financial practices might have predicted some such legislative response (Jennings, 2010, p. 212).…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), passed in July 2002, requires publicly traded companies to submit accurate and reliable financial information. Securing private information is not included in its requirements; however, establishing security controls for confidentiality, availability, and integrity of the reporting are (Kim & Solomon, 2012).…

    • 2582 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Sarbanes-Oxley Act

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was established in 2002 and has initiated extensive transformation to the parameter of economic practice and shared bureaucracy. Nevertheless, it was named after Legislator Paul Sarbanes and Representative Michael Oxley, who were the founders, given it the title Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. On July 30, 2002, President George Bush signed off on SOX, revising the security laws that, moderately, reevaluate the responsibility of accountants. Although the focal point of this statute is on shared organizations, it is projected that banks and investors, who necessitate reviewed reports of the…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    LAW 421 Week 3

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This article is about Congress a suggested revoke of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOA) of 2002. According to this article, the proposal came across as an excuse for some government officials to avoid topics that were is demand of resolution by the public. According to this article, “the SOA of 2002 is unnecessary, harmful, and inadequate” (Niskanen, 2005). Penalties under SOA involved jail time and loss of personal property (Niskanen, 2005).…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Article Review - Sox Act

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The article exposes how the SOX Act imposes a never-ending strain of compliance obligations that have not been helpful to businesses, but has drained the companies of revenue and time (Hunter, 2007). Hunter explains that instituting the PCAOB allows the board to inflict massive penalties on higher-ups within a business, i.e. CEOs and CFOs, through the SOX Act. According to Hunter (2007), “the Board is permitted to make any changes it wishes, which places companies in the position of forever trying to hit a moving target”, (Punishing the Innocent: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, p. 24, para. 2). Because of this, the author believes the Sarbanes-Oxley Act persuades companies to act unethically by conducting some business verbally in-person or over the telephone, thus negating the need to report this information to the PCAOB or SEC and all but ignoring the SOX Act (Hunter, 2007).…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Sarbane-Oxley Act of 2002

    • 3019 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The Institute of Internal Auditors. “The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: Effect on Audit Committees at Publicly Traded Companies.” January 2004. Assessed April 1, 2009 from: http://www.theiia.org/.…

    • 3019 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Sarbanes-Oxley Act

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The 1980s was a time where many corporate misbehaviors and takeovers cost many people their jobs. The Treadway Commission, named after the organizer James C. Treadway, Jr., took the lead in examining the factors why companies misbehave and made recommendations to reduce fraudulent financial reporting. A group of private sectors in the accounting profession volunteered to carry out the goals of the Treadway Commission. This led to the formation of the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, also known as COSO (Arens, Elders, & Beasley, 2010). COSO was the venue in driving the swift passage of SOX. SOX established the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) under the oversight of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The board is charged with the responsibility of overseeing and disciplining independent accounting firms in their role as auditors for public companies. The board has oversight on the implementation of stricter corporate governance, more disciplined exercise of auditor’s independence, enhanced audit reporting, more frequent review of control risk assessments and more informative report disclosures. Under the Sox, the SEC required firms to register with PCAOB to monitor strict compliance of SOX standards in the manner by which public accounting…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 5 Article Review

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages

    RE: Nogler, G., & Inwon, J. (2011, May/June). Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Was the ’one-size-fits-all’ approach justified? Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance (Wiley), 22(4), 65-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.20691…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays