Since July 2007, leading economist believe that this has been the worst financial crisis since the great depression. This essay outlines various viewpoints and influences in respect to the paradigm. Firstly it defines, Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and the impact it has had on International Accounting Standards in regards to implementation and use of their accounting regulations. It also examines The Fair Value Measurement in accordance to the effect it has on the GFC and how the interpretation of fair value is the problem not the method itself. The Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) is also discussed and analysed in terms of it being the dominant theory to justify accounting regulations and standards (Anonymous. 2008a).
Introduction
Due to the impact that the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) has had on the economy around the world, there has been doubt concerning the use and implementation of the International Accounting Standards. A number of people have blamed and criticised the International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) and their regulations. Retrospectively there are some that defend the IASB and believe it has no negative effect on the crisis. An area that has been deeply criticised is the Fair Value Measurement and blames it for the negative effects felt during the financial crisis. Particular individuals believe there is no alternative but to use the Fair Value Measurement. This view is opposed by others who believe it should be changed all together and then the view that there should be modifications made to the fair value regulations to help solve the problems.
The Global Financial Crisis
The Global financial crisis (GFC) is described as an “economic scarcity where there exists a continuous drawback against strategic stable economic growth in the world” (Anonymous. 2009b). Smith (2009) depicts that the financial crisis was created by the real estate bubble burst in the U.S.A, in which caused banks to lower their lending standards and which